USGS ScienceSearch

USGS · ofr20201054

Behavior and movement of adult winter steelhead ( Oncorhynchus mykiss ) in the upper Cowlitz River Basin, Washington, 2017–18

Abstract

Executive Summary A 2-year radiotelemetry study was completed to monitor the movements of adult winter steelhead ( Oncorhynchus mykiss ) in the upper Cowlitz River Basin. A reintroduction program was established to restore healthy and harvestable populations of steelhead because volitional access to the area was blocked in the 1960s after construction of dams in the lower river. A trap-and-haul program is used to move adult steelhead and salmon ( Oncorhynchus spp.) upstream, around the dams and large reservoirs, and release them in the upper basin to spawn naturally. Fish are released into Lake Scanewa, the uppermost reservoir in the system, and into the Cowlitz and Cispus Rivers. The goal of this study was to describe the behavior, movement, and tributary use of adult steelhead in the upper Cowlitz River Basin to assist in evaluating the trap-and-haul program and reintroduction program. We were specifically interested in learning more about the locations where steelhead spawn. Individual fish were assigned one of four fates, based on their location during the spawning period: Cowlitz River, Cispus River, Lake Scanewa, or fallback below the dam that impounds the reservoir. A total of 215 steelhead were tagged for the 2017–18 study. Of these, 5 fish regurgitated their transmitters before or shortly after release, so 210 tagged fish were used for analyses, including 121 fish (57.6 percent) released into the Cispus River and 89 fish (42.4 percent) released into Lake Scanewa. The Cowlitz River release site was not evaluated. Hatchery-origin (HOR) and natural-origin (NOR) steelhead were included in the study. Within the first 10 days after release, most steelhead had moved at least 2 river kilometers away from their release site. Fish released into Lake Scanewa, however, moved from their release site significantly sooner than fish released into the Cispus River, regardless of origin or sex. Most radio-tagged steelhead (93–100 percent) made no more than one trip between the reservoir and one of the rivers prior to spawning. Steelhead were predominantly assigned fates in the river closest to where they were released, but origin also played a role. Steelhead released into the Cispus River were assigned Cispus River fates more than 80 percent of the time, including both origins and both years. About 13 percent of NOR fish had fates in the Cowlitz River, but the proportion was lower for HOR fish (0–2 percent). Fallback was the least common fate for Cispus-released steelhead (three HOR fish in 2017), followed by the reservoir fate, ranging from 5 to 9 percent in 2017, and zero in 2018. The steelhead released into Lake Scanewa were almost exclusively NOR fish, which had primarily Cowlitz River fates (55–57 percent). We released only six HOR steelhead into Lake Scanewa, and they all had Cowlitz River fates. The reservoir fate was uncommon for both release sites, and it was consistently lower in 2018 compared to 2017. Flow conditions were higher in 2017, which may have affected steelhead movement patterns or timing. The three HOR steelhead released in the Cispus River in 2017 were the only fish that fell back over Cowlitz Falls Dam, which represented 1.4 percent of the total study fish, 5.7 percent of the Cispus-released fish in 2017, and 9.4 percent of the Cispus-released HOR fish in 2017. About 62 percent of the steelhead released in Lake Scanewa spawned in the Cowlitz River, with the remaining 38 percent in the Cispus River. Within the Cowlitz River, close to one-half (about 47 percent) of the fish spawned in the upper reach, and about 16 percent spawned in the lower reach. Steelhead released into Lake Scanewa that spawned in the Cispus River were minimal in reach 5 (4 percent) and distributed in approximately equal proportions in the middle (reach 6; 16 percent) and upper (reach 7; 18 percent) reaches. Steelhead released into the Cispus River spawned almost exclusively in the Cispus River (94 percent). The upper Cispus River reach (reach 7) was used by more fish (72 percent) than the middle Cispus reach (reach 6; 16 percent). Taken together, the upper Cowlitz River reach (reach 4) and upper Cispus River reach (reach 7) accounted for more than 71 percent of the spawning locations for radio-tagged steelhead. When the middle Cispus River reach (reach 6) is included with the upper reaches, they account for 87 percent of our described spawning sites. We described 12 tributaries in the Cowlitz River and 8 tributaries in the Cispus River where steelhead spawned. After spawning, about 53–63 percent of steelhead moved downstream as kelts, either being collected at Cowlitz Falls Dam or being detected downstream from the dam. More fish were collected from both release sites in 2018 compared to 2017. Across release sites and years, more NOR fish and females moved downstream as kelts. This study added to the understanding of the behavior and movement of adult steelhead in the upper Cowlitz River Basin, supporting the findings of previous studies in the basin and describing spawning sites in the system’s two main rivers and their tributaries. Future research efforts in this system may use additional telemetry studies, genetic analyses, and spawning ground surveys to provide further insights into the progress of the reintroduction effort.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 45.767522962149876° to 46.98025235521881° latitude; -123.22265625000001° to -120.498046875° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Theresa L. Liedtke, Tobias J. Kock, Amy C. Hansen, Brian K. Ekstrom, Ryan G. Tomka. 2020-05-26. Behavior and movement of adult winter steelhead ( Oncorhynchus mykiss ) in the upper Cowlitz River Basin, Washington, 2017–18. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20201054

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Estimating aftershock risk for entry into earthquake-damaged buildings

We present a simple method to estimate the risk of experiencing strong shaking from aftershocks during entry into earthquake-damaged buildings. We compute wait times until the probability of strong ground shaking from aftershocks reaches a predefined risk threshold; for example, a 0.4 percent probability of experiencing Modified Mercalli Intensity 7 or greater shaking during the planned building entry. We also develop a relation between aftershock probability and the probability of strong shaking, so that users can reference the U.S. Geological Survey aftershock forecast during an ongoing aftershock sequence to determine if the risk threshold has been met. We apply our method to active continental regions (for example, the Western United States), stable continental regions (for example, the Central and Eastern United States), and subduction zones (for example, Cascadia or Alaska).

Open-File Report

End-user needs for remote sensing wetlands of the Prairie Pothole Region of North America

The Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) of North America comprises globally important grassland and wetland ecosystems critical for numerous populations of migratory birds. Due to the importance of this region for migratory birds, and particularly waterfowl, and the threats of habitat loss due to intensifying agriculture, there is a mature and diverse system of conservation organizations, agencies, and partnerships that spends hundreds of millions of dollars annually on habitat conservation to support migratory bird populations. Remote sensing can be a powerful tool for observing and evaluating global change at large scales as well as expanding inferences from field studies to the broader landscape with statistical models. However, development and utilization of these tools has lagged behind their demand for several reasons, including concerns over spatial and temporal resolution and accuracy of products; perception of a misalignment with decision-maker needs; technological barriers such as skill sets of conservation professionals, computing resources, data access, and usability. In this report, we summarize the needs of conservation professionals and scientists who use or want to use remote sensing data products to inform science about wetland change and conservation of wetlands in the PPR. We assembled this information through several methods leading up to, during, and following a January 2026 PPR Wetland Remote Sensing Workshop. The workshop included United States and Canadian scientists, conservation professionals, and policy experts. Our goal was to bring together end-users and remote sensing product developers jointly to explore reducing the lag between product development and utilization of products to inform science and conservation. Specifically, we aimed to identify gaps in wetland remote sensing that limit effective monitoring, management, and conservation in the PPR, and to develop a framework that outlines pathways to address these gaps by fostering collaboration, improving communication networks, encouraging discussion, and building on existing and ongoing efforts. This report summarizes our participants’ descriptions of end-user needs and the outcomes of the workshop.

Prairie Pothole region

Bathymetric survey and storage capacity of Upper Lake Mary near Flagstaff, Arizona in 2024

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the city of Flagstaff, collected bathymetric, light detection and ranging (lidar), and land-survey data of Upper Lake Mary in Arizona during the months of April and October 2024. The city of Flagstaff uses a combination of groundwater from well fields throughout the Flagstaff area and surface water, mainly from Upper Lake Mary, for its potable water supply. The purpose of the survey is to update previous surveys using new technology and compare the results to previous surveys to determine if there was a decrease in storage capacity that could affect the city’s water supply. The lakebed was mapped in April 2024 using a vessel equipped with a multibeam echosounder (MBES) and mobile lidar scanner with positioning captured using a real-time kinematic global navigation satellite system (RTK GNSS) base and receivers. In October 2024, areas of the reservoir that were too shallow for the boat and shoreline that were not captured by the vessel-based lidar were surveyed on foot using hand-held RTK GNSS receivers. At full pool (spillway elevation of 6,831.82 feet above NAVD 88 [2,082.34 meters (m)], Upper Lake Mary has a storage capacity of 16,449.80 acre-feet (20,290,611.73 cubic meters) and a surface area of 953.57 acres (3,860,926.075 square meters). The reservoir is 5.7 miles (9.7 kilometers) long and varies in width from 326 feet (99.36 m) near the central, narrow portion of the reservoir to 2,613 feet (796.44 m) in the upper portion. Comparisons between this survey and the previous two surveys from the 1950s and 2006 indicate no apparent decrease in reservoir area or storage capacity. Results of the 2024 survey indicate that Upper Lake Mary’s storage capacity increased by 0.9 percent from the 2006 survey and a 1.6 percent increase in surface area from the 2006 survey.

Arizona