USGS Science⌕ Search

USGS · 70187738

Interrelationships of Denali's large mammal community

Abstract

Along with its sweeping mountain landscapes, Denali National Park and Preserve (Denali) is probably best known for opportunities to observe the large mammals common to Interior Alaska. Locally known as the “Big Five,” gray wolves ( Canis lupus ), grizzly bears ( Ursus arctos ),moose ( Alces alces ), caribou ( Rangifer tarandus ) and Dall sheep ( Ovis dalli ) have coexisted in the region for millennia. While many other animals occur in Denali, none are as readily associated with the park environment as these species. In addition to the opportunities for viewing or photographing Interior Alaska’s large mammals, Denali is a great natural laboratory to study the species and their interrelationships. Unlike the rest of Interior Alaska, the Denali carnivore/ungulate community has been little affected by human harvests for several decades, and interactions of these species are driven largely by natural phenomena. It is a common perception that large mammals are “abundant” within the protected confines of the park boundaries, but that is not the case. Throughout much of Interior Alaska, large mammals occur at low densities naturally, and Denali is no exception. Although Denali encompasses over 6,600 square miles (17,100 km2 ) of suitable habitat, currently about 100 wolves, 350 grizzly bears, 2,000 caribou, 1,900 moose, and 1,800 Dall sheep occur there. In comparison, areas of the Tanana Flats and northern Alaska Range adjacent to Denali on the east have long been managed for human harvests, and moose occur there at about six times the density of Denali.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Layne G. Adams, Thomas J. Meier, Patricia Owen, Gretchen H. Roffler. 2006. Interrelationships of Denali's large mammal community. https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/70187738

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Connecting the dots: Using multiple datasets to monitor the brown bear population in Katmai National Park and Preserve

Monitoring wide-ranging wildlife populations is challenging. Surveys are time consuming, expensive, and observation conditions need to be just right. But confidently assessing the number of animals, and if their numbers are increasing or decreasing is important for park management and ecological understanding. This article describes survey methods and how they can be combined for the most accurate estimates.

Alaska↗

Monitoring for the future of Central Alaska streams

Streams are good indicators of change and the health of watersheds. By monitoring stream chemical composition and the kinds of life they support, we can learn about how they are being stressed (by activities such as mining or climate change) or recovering from a stress (after restoration efforts). But Central Alaska watersheds and the natural stream conditions they produce are diverse. From long-term monitoring, and repeat measurements, we can start to understand the related baselines and fine-tune our understanding of changes.

Alaska↗

Using monitoring data to understand lake water quality trends in southwest Alaskan National Parks

Lakes are vital ecosystems in southwest Alaska, supporting Pacific salmon, wildlife, and people. In Katmai and Lake Clark National Parks and Preserves, lakes span diverse landscapes containing volcanic uplands, glacier-fed valleys, and tundra all of which combine to influence their temperature, water quality, and ability to support critical uses. As the regional climate shifts, our understanding of lake responses requires more than just measurements of the lake surface water. Through long-term sampling of lakes from the surface to deep waters, we track how the environment —shaped by weather, geology, and land cover—governs lake water quality, including temperature, dissolved oxygen, specific conductance, pH, and turbidity. These data help us understand and predict how lake water quality will change across seasons and landscapes, and what this will mean for lake ecology and the habitats fish and wildlife depend on. This work builds a foundation for predicting how Alaska’s lakes are changing and what that means for the ecosystems and communities they support.

Alaska↗