USGS Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70156830

Dynamic response to strike-slip tectonic control on the deposition and evolution of the Baranof Fan, Gulf of Alaska

Maureen A. L. Walton·Sean P. S. Gulick·Robert S. Reece·Ginger A. Barth·Gail L. Christeson·Harm J. VanAvendonk
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Baranof Fan is one of three large deep-sea fans in the Gulf of Alaska, and is a key component in understanding large-scale erosion and sedimentation patterns for southeast Alaska and western Canada. We integrate new and existing seismic reflection profiles to provide new constraints on the Baranof Fan area, geometry, volume, and channel development. We estimate the fan’s area and total sediment volume to be ∼323,000 km 2 and ∼301,000 km 3 , respectively, making it among the largest deep-sea fans in the world. We show that the Baranof Fan consists of channel-levee deposits from at least three distinct aggradational channel systems: the currently active Horizon and Mukluk channels, and the waning system we call the Baranof channel. The oldest sedimentary deposits are in the northern fan, and the youngest deposits at the fan’s southern extent; in addition, the channels seem to avulse southward consistently through time. We suggest that Baranof Fan sediment is sourced from the Coast Mountains in southeastern Alaska, transported offshore most recently via fjord to glacial sea valley conduits. Because of the translation of the Pacific plate northwest past sediment sources on the North American plate along the Queen Charlotte strike-slip fault, we suggest that new channel formation, channel beheadings, and southward-migrating channel avulsions have been influenced by regional tectonics. Using a simplified tectonic reconstruction assuming a constant Pacific plate motion of 4.4 cm/yr, we estimate that Baranof Fan deposition initiated ca. 7 Ma.

Explore related subjects

GeosphereArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Maureen A. L. Walton, Sean P. S. Gulick, Robert S. Reece, Ginger A. Barth, Gail L. Christeson, Harm J. VanAvendonk. 2014. Dynamic response to strike-slip tectonic control on the deposition and evolution of the Baranof Fan, Gulf of Alaska. https://doi.org/10.1130/ges01034.1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Ignimbrites of the Sour Creek dome, Yellowstone volcano, USA: Implications for the Lava Creek Tuff eruption and Yellowstone Caldera

Field observations plus sanidine compositional and 40 Ar/ 39 Ar age data collected on rocks from the Sour Creek dome (SCD) area of Yellowstone volcano (United States) serve to identify five new ignimbrite packages with ages (average 631.5 ± 0.9 ka) that are analytically indistinguishable from those of the Lava Creek Tuff (LCT), challenging the current framework of two LCT eruptive members. Newly recognized package 1 occurs as LCT-aged recycled clasts within a proximal lag breccia, reflecting a major time break in the LCT eruption sequence. Conformably above, the scoria-bearing ignimbrite of package 2 is extensively found in the dome, having been previously mis-mapped as Huck-leberry Ridge Tuff and LCT member A. To the south, package 3 is a crystal-rich, densely welded ignimbrite (inferred to be younger than package 2) that is conformably overlain by package 4, a fine-grained ignimbrite that contains abundant clasts of recycled tuff. Lastly, the topographically highest parts of the dome are made up of package 5, a multicomponent ignimbrite containing scoria, recycled clasts, and pumices, potentially correlative with package 2 and/or package 4. Cathodoluminescence imaging and zoning assessment was integrated with sanidine geochemistry from all five packages, including their recycled clasts. Four of the five packages were sourced from separate magmatic bodies within a larger plumbing system, each defined by their sanidine Ba distributions and componentry. Although the SCD was originally mapped as a resurgent dome and is actively deforming today, faults cutting the region show comparable offsets for NW-SE “resurgent faulting” as for orthogonal NE-SW faulting, the latter of which also cuts the 162 ka Elephant Back lava flow. We infer that faulting in the SCD well postdates eruption and that the SCD instead represents a domical accumulation of ignimbrite, not a resurgent structure. The abundance of recycled materials (and absence of Absaroka country rocks) in the SCD ignimbrites implies that vent locations were well inboard of the mapped caldera boundary, with some potentially along the line of the Yellowstone River, requiring a revision of the currently accepted LCT caldera outline. The LCT eruptive events were thus far more complex than currently recognized, with multiple deposits fed from multiple magma bodies over a time scale that cannot be resolved by radiometric dating.

Wyoming↗
USGS2026

Syn-magmatic subsidence during the early stages of continental rifting in the Mesoproterozoic—A reanalysis of legacy data for the Midcontinent Rift, western Lake Superior

The Midcontinent Rift system (ca. 1.1 Ga) is a 2000-km-long series of elongated volcanic and sedimentary troughs and associated intrusive centers exposed chiefly in the Lake Superior region of North America. The rift system represents a long history of intense magmatism and subsequent sedimentation that was arrested by far-field tectonic events before sea-floor spreading was established. The premature cessation preserved a record of processes related to the beginning of continental rifting. The rift system under Lake Superior has been long studied using seismic-reflection data collected as part of the Great Lakes International Multidisciplinary Program on Crustal Evolution (GLIMPCE). We reexamine GLIMPCE Line C by developing a detailed velocity model for time to depth conversion constrained by other legacy data. We corroborate the model and develop a geologic interpretation using gravity and magnetic modeling and ties to geology mapped onshore. We recognize superposed subsiding sedimentary and volcanic basins for the southern half of the Line C depth section. This interpretation differs from previous paradigms that show major crustal faults that bound half-grabens or full grabens. We conclude that high-velocity (6.9 km/s) intrusive zones rather than major crustal faults border the sides of the basins. We speculate that the volcanic basin represents the initiation of seaward dipping reflectors. The syn-magmatic subsidence can be explained by dike injection and volcanic loading. Discrete lava basins throughout the region likely subsided at different times in a disorganized manner along the rift trend, raising questions about the long-term role of lithospheric thinning and melt generation.

Michigan, Minnesota, Ontario, Wisconsin↗
USGS2026

Characterizing changes in postfire debris-flow hazard as burned areas recover

Emergency assessments of postfire debris-flow hazards that are performed by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) provide estimates of debris-flow likelihood and rainfall triggering conditions that are used for evaluating and managing runoff-generated debris-flow hazards in recently burned areas throughout the western United States. Although the immediate postfire period, within roughly one year after fire, is typically the most susceptible to runoff-generated debris flows, the hazard evolves in time and space as the burned area recovers. The recovery trajectory a given burned area will take depends on local climate and weather and can be difficult to predict. Some burned areas recover quickly, whereas others experience debris flows for multiple years after fire. As a result, extending our ability to update debris-flow likelihood estimates and rainfall thresholds based on observed recovery of the burned area would be beneficial. We present a method for multi-year runoff-generated debris-flow hazard assessment that leverages the USGS “M1” debris-flow likelihood model and integrates updated, satellite-derived, normalized burn ratio data to estimate vegetation recovery. We predict recovery-aware rainfall thresholds and validate them against a multi-year debris-flow hazard prediction and could be adapted for use with other debris-flow models that incorporate burn severity data.

Arizona, California, Colorado, New Mexico, Washing↗