USGS Science⌕ Search

USGS · 70156724

Dramatic increase in sea otter mortality from white sharks in California

Abstract

Although southern sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis) are not considered prey for white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias), sharks do nonetheless bite sea otters. We analyzed spatial and temporal trends in shark bites on sea otters in California, assessing the frequency of shark bite wounds in 1,870 carcasses collected since 1985. The proportion of stranded sea otters having shark bites has increased sharply since 2003, and white shark bites now account for >50% of recovered carcasses. The trend was most pronounced in the southern part of the range, from Estero Bay to Point Conception, where shark bite frequency has increased eightfold. Seasonal trends were also evident: most shark-bitten carcasses are recovered in late summer and fall; however, the period of elevated shark bite frequency has lengthened. The causes of these trends are unclear, but possible contributing factors include increased white shark abundance and/or changes in white shark behavior and distribution. In particular, the spatiotemporal patterns of shark-bitten sea otters match increases in pinniped populations, and the increased availability of marine mammal prey for white sharks may have led to more sharks spending more time in nearshore waters utilized by both sea otters and pinnipeds.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 32.534156° to 42.009247° latitude; -124.409591° to -114.134768° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M. Tim Tinker, Brian B. Hatfield, Michael D. Harris, Jack A. Ames. 2015-08-14. Dramatic increase in sea otter mortality from white sharks in California. https://doi.org/10.1111/mms.12261

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Detecting polar bears on land using satellite imagery and deep learning

Summer land use is increasing for polar bears in the Beaufort Sea, which may lead to increases in human-bear interactions. Remote methods may enable noninvasive approaches to monitor polar bear abundance and distribution on land. We examined the potential of using very high-resolution optical satellite imagery to detect polar bears on land from images collected at three sites on the Beaufort Sea coast of Alaska. Additionally, we evaluated the use of deep learning models to automate detection of polar bears in these images and the degree to which detection of polar bears differed among three very high-resolution optical satellite missions. Pléiades Neo images exhibited 90% average precision in validation analyses using a faster region-based convolutional neural network model, which was 55% and 11% greater than the average precision using WorldView-2 or -3 images, respectively. Applying the Pléiades Neo training set to new imagery exhibited lower precision (35%), but high recall (100%), which indicates that deep learning could be used to expedite the visual detection of polar bears in imagery. Very high-resolution optical satellite imagery provides a remote method for monitoring polar bears on land where they occur in high densities, but satellite mission, off-nadir angle, pansharpening methods, and image resolution are important considerations.

Alaska↗

Quantifying southern sea otter (Enhydra lutris nereis) reactions to a quadcopter drone in central California

Drones are useful for wildlife research and management, but they can cause disturbance and harassment to wildlife. Sea otters ( Enhydra lutris ) are candidates for drone-based observation and monitoring but are vulnerable to disturbance. No studies have evaluated drone effects on sea otter behavior, but based on prior disturbance studies, we hypothesized: (1) sea otters would exhibit behaviors indicating higher reactivity in the presence of drones than when drones were absent and (2) drone disturbance to sea otters would be greater when drones were closer. At two sites in Monterey Bay, CA, we conducted 37 observational sessions, recording behavior codes for focal sea otters during a baseline (no drone) period and three consecutive drone flights. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and ordinal logistic regression models. At both locations, focal sea otters had higher behavior codes during drone trials compared to baseline, and behavior codes increased with descending drone altitude. Pup presence, group size, flight trial number, and gull presence were significant covariables. We calculated multipliers to predict drone-mediated behavioral responses at a range of drone altitudes. Our findings can inform best practices for a variety of uses of drones around sea otters, including population monitoring, oil spill response, and drone photography/videography.

California↗