Technical note assessing the accuracy of Landsat Thematic Mapper classification using double sampling

M. A. Kalkhan; R.M. Reich; T.J. Stohlgren

doi:10.1080/014311698214857

Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70020814

Technical note assessing the accuracy of Landsat Thematic Mapper classification using double sampling

M. A. Kalkhan·R.M. Reich·T.J. Stohlgren

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Double sampling was used to provide a cost efficient estimate of the accuracy of a Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) classification map of a scene located in the Rocky Mountain National Park, Colorado. In the first phase, 200 sample points were randomly selected to assess the accuracy between Landsat TM data and aerial photography. The overall accuracy and Kappa statistic were 49.5 per cent and 32.5 per cent, respectively. In the second phase, 25 sample points identified in the first phase were selected using stratified random sampling and located in the field. This information was used to correct for misclassification errors associated with the first phase samples. The overall accuracy and Kappa statistic increased to 59.6 per cent and 45.6 per cent, respectively.

Explore related subjects

International Journal of Remote Sensing Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

M. A. Kalkhan, R.M. Reich, T.J. Stohlgren. 2010-11-25. Technical note assessing the accuracy of Landsat Thematic Mapper classification using double sampling. https://doi.org/10.1080/014311698214857

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Bridging remote sensing advances and management needs for small Prairie Pothole waterbodies using a multiscale accuracy assessment

Remote sensing of surface water provides a powerful tool to inform the management of waterfowl habitat, but there is little information available to directly assess the relative accuracy of different remote sensing datasets. Our objective was to understand how the characteristics of remotely sensed inundation datasets inform dataset accuracy, the reliable detection of small waterbodies, the distribution of surface water, observation frequency and completeness of data: all attributes relevant to the management of waterfowl habitat. We compared surface water composites from 10 remotely sensed surface water datasets from 2016 to 2021 to in-situ surface water data for three complexes of small waterbodies in the U.S. Prairie Pothole Region and evaluated their accuracy at the pixel, waterbody and local landscape scales. While all products had high per-pixel balanced accuracies (>0.75), we found distinct differences in waterbody area and landscape distribution estimates among datasets. Sentinel-1-based datasets provided a more complete set of observations over time and were more sensitive in detecting water presence in smaller waterbodies but were less accurate at identifying waterbody area than other datasets evaluated. Landsat datasets, alternatively, produced simpler landscape distributions that largely omitted the smallest waterbodies. While the datasets that either fused Sentinel-1 and −2 data collections or utilized local training data had the highest performances (e.g. balanced accuracy = 0.92), all datasets had use-case scenarios for which they may be informative. Our comparisons revealed differences that were not evident in traditional pixel-scale accuracy assessment, such as an 18-fold difference in the number of inundated waterbodies identified across remote sensing datasets. These findings provide novel insights for waterfowl conservation management on howremote sensing datasets may differ in their ability to monitor annual spring surface water presence within landscapes dominated by small waterbodies, such as the Prairie Pothole Region.

Minnesota, North Dakota↗

USGS2026

Sentinel-2 for chlorophyll-a water quality monitoring: A review of validation evidence and application potential

Water quality monitoring is integral to preserving the health of freshwater ecosystems, and satellite remote sensing has emerged as one monitoring method. Sentinel-2, in particular, has been valuable for water quality monitoring due to its 5-day global temporal revisit time and spatial resolution that ranges from 10 to 60 metres. Sentinel-2 can be used to measure and monitor chlorophyll-a, which historically has been used as an indicator of water quality, eutrophication and harmful algal blooms. Our goal was to review aquatic chlorophyll-a Sentinel-2 research to assess the types of validation evidence reported. Validation evidence is defined here as the set of information key to assessing algorithm performance, and include the spatial and temporal scales of satellite validation, reported in situ sampling method context information, demonstration of validation results through plots, and appropriate algorithm performance metrics. We highlight how the body of literature collectively contributes to advancing a national scale chlorophyll-a product that could support future resource management applications. Our review of 122 published studies indicated that much of the validation evidence corresponded to early stages, as defined by the NASA data maturity framework, due to a limited focus on individual lakes and limited detail on methodology for reproducibility. Prioritizing data accessibility for both in situ data and satellite workflows used in published studies; reporting methods with transparency and consistency; and using standard algorithm performance metrics could provide a consistent framework to support and enhance the utility of satellite inland water quality research. These three quality assurance mechanisms can promote effective evaluation of approaches for remote sensing of chlorophyll-a. Adopting these quality criteria could enable the integration of validation evidence from multiple studies, supporting more spatially and temporally representative products that would advance these approaches towards maturation for broader application.

International Journal of Remote Sensing↗

USGS2025

Assessing gap-filled Landsat land surface temperature time-series data using different observational datasets

Landsat Analysis Ready Data (ARD)-based time-series present challenges in monitoring surface urban heat islands (SUHI) due to rapid changes in land surface temperature (LST) compared to cloud-free satellite observations. This research investigates the use of a spatiotemporal gap-filling model as a feasible and cost-effective solution to produce Landsat time-series LST products with both high spatial resolution and temporal frequency. The study identified and filled Landsat ARD thermal times-series data gaps due to missing data, cloud and shadow effects, and data quality. The accuracy of Landsat gap-filled products was assessed using randomly selected clear observations of Landsat and uncertainty products from the gap-filling model and was evaluated using various existing temperature datasets, including climate data from NOAA Global Historical Climate Network station observations, Daily Surface Weather and Climatological Summaries (DAYMET), and LST including MODIS, VIIRS and ECOSTRESS. The result suggests that the gap-filled Landsat LST has significant correlations with existing datasets including field observation and remote sensing data derived from other sensors that have similar monthly and seasonal variation patterns. The uncertainty maps show spatial distributions of uncertainty for gap-filled pixels that have high or low uncertainties. The Landsat gap-filled time-series datasets can be used to measure annual, seasonal, or even monthly landscape thermal conditions, which are useful for SUHI and relevant research, and to perform multi-decade time-series LST change analysis under climate change conditions.

International Journal of Remote Sensing↗