Determination of selected elements in whole coal and in coal ash from the eight argonne premium coal samples by atomic absorption spectrometry, atomic emission spectrometry, and ion-selective electrode

M. W. Doughten; J.R. Gillison

doi:10.1021/ef00023a002

Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70016108

Determination of selected elements in whole coal and in coal ash from the eight argonne premium coal samples by atomic absorption spectrometry, atomic emission spectrometry, and ion-selective electrode

M. W. Doughten·J.R. Gillison

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Methods for the determination of 24 elements in whole coal and coal ash by inductively coupled argon plasma-atomic emission spectrometry, flame, graphite furnace, and cold vapor atomic absorption spectrometry, and by ion-selective electrode are described. Coal ashes were analyzed in triplicate to determine the precision of the methods. Results of the analyses of NBS Standard Reference Materials 1633, 1633a, 1632a, and 1635 are reported. Accuracy of the methods is determined by comparison of the analysis of standard reference materials to their certified values as well as other values in the literature.

Explore related subjects

Energy & Fuels Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

M. W. Doughten, J.R. Gillison. 2002-05-01. Determination of selected elements in whole coal and in coal ash from the eight argonne premium coal samples by atomic absorption spectrometry, atomic emission spectrometry, and ion-selective electrode. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef00023a002

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Permeability and compressibility of “seal” sediment overlying the B1 sand gas hydrate reservoir: Hydrate 02 Geo Data Well, Prudhoe Bay unit, Alaska North Slope

An important element in evaluating the viability of extracting methane from a gas hydrate-bearing reservoir is establishing the effectiveness of the overlying bounding sediment as a seal to prevent gas loss, to enable effective depressurization, and to prevent fluid from entering the reservoir during production. This laboratory study presents results for index properties (e.g., grain density, grain size, and liquid limit), compressibility and swelling indices, and permeability measurements on sediment overlying the gas hydrate-bearing reservoir that was the target of the recent JOGMEC-DOE-USGS collaborative gas hydrate production testing project on the Alaska North Slope (ANS). Sediment analyzed in this study was collected during pressure coring operations in the HYDRATE 02 Geo Data Well (GDW). The ∼6.1 m sediment interval recovered in Cores 13P and 14P (878.74–884.88 m measured depth, MD) exhibited heterogeneous sedimentologic characteristics at the centimeter scale, with sediments ranging from clay to thin silty-sand lithologies. Permeability measurements and index-property correlations indicate the interval’s overall in situ vertical permeability ranges from 0.2 to 3.6 microdarcy (μD). Results for compressibility ( C C = 0.255 ± 0.02) and swelling index ( C S = 0.04 ± 0.01) are consistent with estimates based on mineralogy and liquid limit correlations. Based on the measured compressibility, the ∼3 MPa increase in effective stress during the stable phase of depressurization-induced production is anticipated to have imposed 2.43 cm of compaction per meter in the reservoir overburden, reducing permeability by ∼36%. The overburden sediment’s low in situ permeability (3 to 4 orders of magnitude below permeabilities measured in the gas hydrate-bearing part of the B1 sand (unit B)) suggests the B1 sand′s overburden provides an effective seal. Such a seal promotes efficient production by limiting fluid flow into the reservoir during depressurization-induced gas hydrate dissociation.

Alaska↗

USGS2026

Strength, stiffness, and Poisson’s ratio measurements for cements used in the well completions for the extended-duration gas production test on the Alaskan North Slope

As part of an extended-duration production test from a natural gas hydrate reservoir on the Alaska North Slope, a suite of optical-fiber sensors was encased in the completion cement to provide stable downhole monitoring around each of the four project wells. How the sensors respond to changes in the reservoir over time depends in part on properties of the LiteCRETE, ArcticCem, or Tuned Light cement in which each sensor is encased, and on how well the cement bonded to the well casing, sensors, and sediment formation. Here, we report on physical properties of the cements (compressive and tensile strength, stiffness, and Poisson’s ratio), on the downhole distribution of the cements used in each well, and on the cement bond quality. Physical property measurements are presented for cements sampled during the completion activities for the three wells completed in 2022–2023. Samples were cured while being submerged in water at 2–4 °C, then tested at intervals from ∼30 days to more than one year. After an initial period of rapid increase, cement strengths largely stabilized around 120 days in all cases, meaning that cements in all wells reached their nominal strength plateau four months or more before the production test began. Calculations based on recorded volumes of pumped cement show the subpermafrost, main hole portion of each well is encased only in the higher-density “tail” cement used in that well. Downhole cement evaluation logs from two wells demonstrate how the presence of sensors and other hardware outside the casing interferes with the cement evaluation assessment. Nonetheless, the cement evaluations indicate a generally good bond with the formation and sensors over the gas hydrate reservoir intervals.

Alaska↗

USGS2026

Oil in the Alaska North Slope gas hydrate reservoir: Micro-CT and flow simulation insights into permeability

Gas hydrate-bearing sands on the Alaska North Slope (ANS) host minor volumes of crude oil whose impact on formation permeability has never been quantified relative to a gas hydrate reservoir system. Here, we combine in situ pressure-core microcomputed-tomography (μ-CT), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), gas-chromatography–mass-spectrometry (GC–MS), scanning-electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), and Stokes-flow simulation to (i) quantify oil saturation, (ii) infer its source, and (iii) evaluate its influence on permeability after gas-hydrate dissociation. μ-CT and SEM-EDS imaging identify the host sediment as silty, with some grain-coating clay present. Eight representative 300 3 -voxel subvolumes extracted from a preserved pressure core (Core 15P-3c, from the B1 sand (unit B), HYDRATE 02 Geo Data Well (GDW), 886.96–887.29 m measured depth, MD) exhibit porosities of 0.34–0.37 and an average oil saturation of 0.09 ± 0.03, in comparison to an independent TGA-based estimate of 0.16. GC-MS fingerprints obtained from an adjacent depressurized core (Core 17P-1, 891.37–891.44 m MD), together with oil pore habit revealed by μ-CT, suggest that the oil is partly native but also includes contributions from mineral oil-based drilling fluid contamination. Further analysis of oil–porewater interactions and flushing tests confirms that native oil saturation in the analyzed samples ranges from 0.04 to 0.08 with an average of approximately 0.06, and the oil is highly immobile. Flow simulations demonstrate that the native oil saturation of ≈0.06 reduces permeability by approximately 50% due to both pore blockage and increased flow-path tortuosity. These findings reveal the potential presence of native oil within the ANS gas hydrate reservoir and suggest that future simulation models may need to account for its impact on permeability to improve long-term performance predictions of gas and water production.

Alaska↗