USGS Science⌕ Search

USGS · 5223761

Generic names of northern and southern fur seals (Mammalia: Otariidae)

Abstract

We have resolved a nomenclatural problem discovered during research on the northern fur seal that concerns the correct generic name for this taxon and for fur seals of the Southern Hemisphere. The unfortunate practice by some 19th-century authors to use names in their Latinized form but to date them from their first appearance as French common names led to the use of Arctocepbalus for southern fur seals when the name correctly applies to the northern fur seal, known today as Callorbinus ursinus . However, Arctocepbalus and Callorbinus are antedated by Otoes G. Fischer, 1817, which is the earliest available generic name for the fur seal of the northern Pacific. The earliest available generic name for southern fur seals is Halarctus Gill, 1866. To avoid the confusion that would result from replacing the currently used generic names with those required by strict adherence to the Principle of Priority, we have petitioned the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature to preserve Arctocepbalus and Callorbinus for the southern and northern fur seals, respectively.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alfred L. Gardner, C. Brian Robbins. 2006-08-26. Generic names of northern and southern fur seals (Mammalia: Otariidae). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.1998.tb00741.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Detecting polar bears on land using satellite imagery and deep learning

Summer land use is increasing for polar bears in the Beaufort Sea, which may lead to increases in human-bear interactions. Remote methods may enable noninvasive approaches to monitor polar bear abundance and distribution on land. We examined the potential of using very high-resolution optical satellite imagery to detect polar bears on land from images collected at three sites on the Beaufort Sea coast of Alaska. Additionally, we evaluated the use of deep learning models to automate detection of polar bears in these images and the degree to which detection of polar bears differed among three very high-resolution optical satellite missions. Pléiades Neo images exhibited 90% average precision in validation analyses using a faster region-based convolutional neural network model, which was 55% and 11% greater than the average precision using WorldView-2 or -3 images, respectively. Applying the Pléiades Neo training set to new imagery exhibited lower precision (35%), but high recall (100%), which indicates that deep learning could be used to expedite the visual detection of polar bears in imagery. Very high-resolution optical satellite imagery provides a remote method for monitoring polar bears on land where they occur in high densities, but satellite mission, off-nadir angle, pansharpening methods, and image resolution are important considerations.

Alaska↗

Quantifying southern sea otter (Enhydra lutris nereis) reactions to a quadcopter drone in central California

Drones are useful for wildlife research and management, but they can cause disturbance and harassment to wildlife. Sea otters ( Enhydra lutris ) are candidates for drone-based observation and monitoring but are vulnerable to disturbance. No studies have evaluated drone effects on sea otter behavior, but based on prior disturbance studies, we hypothesized: (1) sea otters would exhibit behaviors indicating higher reactivity in the presence of drones than when drones were absent and (2) drone disturbance to sea otters would be greater when drones were closer. At two sites in Monterey Bay, CA, we conducted 37 observational sessions, recording behavior codes for focal sea otters during a baseline (no drone) period and three consecutive drone flights. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and ordinal logistic regression models. At both locations, focal sea otters had higher behavior codes during drone trials compared to baseline, and behavior codes increased with descending drone altitude. Pup presence, group size, flight trial number, and gull presence were significant covariables. We calculated multipliers to predict drone-mediated behavioral responses at a range of drone altitudes. Our findings can inform best practices for a variety of uses of drones around sea otters, including population monitoring, oil spill response, and drone photography/videography.

California↗