USGS Science⌕ Search

USGS · 1008268

Life history plasticity and population regulation in sea otters

Abstract

We contrasted body condition, and age-specific reproduction and mortality between a growing population of sea otters ( Enhydra lutris ) at Kodiak Island and a high-density near-equilibrium population at Amchitka Island, Alaska. We obtained data from marked individuals, population surveys, and collections of beach-cast carcasses. Mass:length ratios indicated that females (but not males) captured in 1992 at Amchitka were in poorer condition than those captured at Kodiak in 1986–1987. In 1993, the condition of females at Amchitka improved in apparent response to two factors: (1) an episodic influx of Pacific smooth lumpsuckers, Aptocyclus ventricocus , from the epi-pelagic zone, which otters consumed; and (2) an increase in the otters’ benthic invertebrate prey resulting from declining otter numbers. Reproductive rates varied with age (0.37 [CI=0.21 to 0.53] births female −1 yr −1 for 2–3-yr-olds, and 0.83 [CI=0.69 to 0.90] for females ≥4 yr old), and were similar at both areas. Weaning success (pups surviving to ≥120 d), in contrast, was almost 50% lower at Amchitka than at Kodiak and for females ≥4 yr of age was 0.52 (CI=0.38 to 0.66) vs 0.94 (CI=0.75 to 0.99), respectively. Sixty-two percent of the preweaning pup losses at Amchitka occurred within a month of parturition and 79% within two months. Postweaning survival was also low at Amchitka as only 18% of instrumented pups were known to be alive one year after mother-pup separation. Adult survival rates appeared similar at Amchitka and Kodiak. Factors affecting survival early in life thus are a primary demographic mechanism of population regulation in sea otters. By maintaining uniformly high reproductive rates over time and limiting investment in any particular reproductive event, sea otters can take advantage of unpredictable environmental changes favorable to pup survival. This strategy is consistent with predictions of “bet-hedging” life history models.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Daniel H. Monson, James A. Estes, James L. Bodkin, Donald B. Siniff. 2003-04-16. Life history plasticity and population regulation in sea otters. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900304.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

A framework for investigating fish population density responses to habitat fragmentation

Globally, fish populations that rely on rivers are being fragmented by in-stream barriers, but it is unclear how pervasive any negative population responses to fragmentation are. We developed a modeling framework for estimating density responses of fishes upstream and downstream of in-stream barriers and applied it to learn how low-head dams have influenced fish assemblages in 24 Great Lakes tributaries. Of the 29 species modeled, we found strong evidence for increased (n = 6 species) and decreased population densities (n = 6 species) in habitat upstream of low-head dams, while we only found strong evidence for population increases downstream of dams (n = 16 species). The time required for 50% of the dam-induced change to fish population density to occur, t 50 , was on the order of decades; mean t 50 was 41 years in habitat downstream of low-head dams and 21 years in upstream habitat. Estimates of t 50 suggest that negative effects occurred faster than positive effects. However, the power of this comparison remains limited because evidence for the logistic population growth model used to derive t 50 was strong for only 1 of 29 fish species. We propose that different mechanisms account for the responses observed, with positive responses driven by changes in assemblage structure and negative responses driven by decreased immigration. Our research demonstrates how frameworks considering metapopulation dynamics and the potential for time lags between barrier construction and fish population responses can advance understanding of how in-stream barriers structure the distribution and abundance of fish populations in rivers.

Great Lakes↗

Hosts, pathogens and hot ponds: Thermal mean and variability contribute to spatial patterns of chytrid infection

Temperature is a primary driver of heterogeneity in host–pathogen dynamics and understanding how patch-scale temperature affects landscape-scale patterns of pathogen infection is key to effective monitoring and management. In field studies, both temperature variability and mean temperature are often related to infection of ectothermic animals by fungal pathogens, and although these factors vary spatiotemporally, their contributions to infection outcomes are rarely decomposed into spatial and temporal components. We studied how patch-scale thermal conditions (mean and variability) affect infection of eastern newts Notophthalmus viridescens by Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis ( Bd ), with a special focus on disentangling spatial versus temporal contributions of thermal conditions to infection outcomes. We measured in situtemperature and Bd infection across 20 ponds in two years in southeastern Wisconsin, USA to 1) understand thermal mediation of infection and 2) quantify whether seasonal and/or among-site variation in thermal conditions drive heterogeneity in host–pathogen interactions. In our system, thermal mean and variability covaried tightly, necessitating the creation of a single index to capture both components. We found that 1) this index of thermal mean and variability was strongly and nonlinearly related to Bd infection and 2) differences among patches in thermal conditions drove this relationship, highlighting that variation in patch-level conditions can drive heterogenous host–pathogen outcomes across landscapes. Our research collectively reveals insights about the importance of local, patch-level conditions for mediating disease risk at broader scales.

Wisconsin↗

Bioclimatic, demographic, and anthropogenic correlates of grizzly bear activity patterns in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem

Plasticity of diel activity rhythms may be a key element for adaptations of wildlife populations to changing environmental conditions. In the last decades, grizzly bears Ursus arctos in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE) have experienced notable environmental fluctuations, including changes in availability of food sources and severe droughts. Although substantial research has been conducted on grizzly bear diets, space use, and demographic parameters, studies on factors that may influence their diel activity patterns are lacking. We investigated diel activity of grizzly bears in the GYE as a function of anthropogenic landscape modification, maximum daily ambient temperature, drought severity, and bear density. Specifically, we used accelerometry readings of 169 bears (39 females, 130 males) from 2009 to 2022 to compute three complementary activity measures, hourly intensity of activity, daily active minutes, and active bout length, each used as a response variable within a Bayesian modeling framework. Grizzly bears generally exhibited bimodal diel activity, with crepuscular peaks and slight variations across seasons. Females with young (i.e. cubs or yearlings) were an exception, with more pronounced diurnal activity patterns, possibly as a strategy to avoid infanticide by dominant males. Landscape modification and maximum ambient temperature were the factors most strongly associated with activity patterns of grizzly bears, with greater nocturnality observed in lone females and males as these factors increased. Females with young were comparatively less affected. The GYE is changing because of increasing land development, human recreation pressures, and effects of climate change. Given their greater diurnal activity compared with other cohorts, female grizzly bears with dependent offspring may be more constrained in their ability to modify activity patterns. Our findings add to a growing body of research emphasizing the importance of the temporal dimension of wildlife behavior as a critical factor in assessing species adaptability and vulnerability in a changing world.

Idaho, Montana, Wyoming↗