USGS Science⌕ Search

Geology topics

J. F. Gibbs

Publications and source records attributed to J. F. Gibbs.

13 recordsLinked to original sources
USGS2003

Estimated ground motion from the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake at the site of interstate 10 and La Cienega Boulevard bridge collapse, West Los Angeles, California

We have estimated ground motions at the site of a bridge collapse during the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake. The estimated motions are based on correcting motions recorded during the mainshock 2.3 km from the collapse site for the relative site response of the two sites. Shear-wave slownesses and damping based on analysis of borehole measurements at the two sites were used in the site response analysis. We estimate that the motions at the collapse site were probably larger, by factors ranging from 1.2 to 1.6, than at the site at which the ground motion was recorded, for periods less than about 1 sec.

California↗
USGS2001

Integrated surface and borehole strong-motion, soil-response arrays in San Francisco, California

An integrated set of four borehole arrays and ten surface installations is installed in the city of San Francisco, California to measure the response of soft-soil deposits to strong earthquake ground motions. The borehole arrays extend through thick layers of softwater-saturated soils of Holocene age and older more consolidated soils of Pleistocene age into bedrock at depths up to 100 m. The surface installations are configured in pairs to provide simultaneous comparative surface measurements of soft soils and nearby rock. The rock locations also permit comparative measurements of rock as observed at the surface and in nearby boreholes. Complementary structural response arrays alsoare installed near each array. The arrays are designed to address a wide variety of scientific and engineering issues, and especially the issue of anelastic and nonlinear soil response at high strain levels. Exact anelastic models have been developed to account for contrasts in anelastic properties at boundaries and the resultant inhomogeneity of propagating wave fields. These models predict that significant amounts of energy may be trapped in soil basins with resultant larger amplifications than can be predicted using conventional homogeneous wave-field models with damping. Results of these models are discussed.

California↗
USGS1964

Seismic-refraction measurements of crustal structure between Nevada Test Site and Ludlow, California

Seismic-refraction measurements from nuclear and chemical explosions were made along a line from the Nevada Test Site (NTS) to Ludlow, California, and additional recordings from nuclear explosions were made southward toward Calexico, California. The time of first arrivals from the Ludlow shotpoint is expressed as T 0 = 0.00 + Δ/2.50 (assumed), T 1 = 1.00 + Δ6.10, T 2 = 2.81 + Δ/6.80, and T 3 = 5.48 + ~7.76, where T is in seconds and distance Δ is in km. First arrival times from NTS fit the lines T 1 = 0.74 + Δ/6.10, T 2 = 2.81 + Δ/6.80 (assumed), T 3 = 6.70 + Δ/8.04 to a distance of 265 km, beyond 265 km T 3 = 5.83 + Δ/7.75. The difference in the apparent velocities of the P n (T 3 ) arrival is caused by variations in the dip of the Mohorovicic discontinuity. The thickness of the successive layers at NTS are H 0 s 1.0 km (V 0 ~ 2.5 km/sec), H 1 = 13 km (v 1 = 6.1 km/sec), and H 2 = 20 km (v 2 = 6.8 km/ sec); the total crustal thickness is 34 km. The successive crustal layers at Ludlow have a thickness of H 0 = 1.4 km, H 1 = 13 km, and H 2 = 13 km; the total crustal thickness is 27 km.

Arizona, California, Nevada↗