USGS Science⌕ Search

SEARCH · USGS Science

Results for “Earth, Planets and Space”

Search indexed USGS publications on groundwater, aquifers, geologic maps, mineral resources and earthquakes. Explore source records by subject and place.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

1,659 records · Page 93Linked to original sources
USGS2024

Evaluating the impact of uncertainty in ground motion forecasts for post-earthquake impact modeling applications

The US Geological Survey’s (USGS) ShakeMap system provides a rapid characterization of strong ground shaking in areas directly affected by an earthquake. This study focuses on studying the aggregate effects of macroseismic shaking estimates from ShakeMap, expressed in terms of modified Mercalli intensity (MMI), when accounting for the uncertainty in forecasted ground motions. We use a Monte Carlo approach to generate numerous spatially correlated realizations of ground motions by utilizing a combination of circulant embedding and kriging techniques for efficiently handling the correlations. We then assessed the aggregate effects of shaking by looking at bin counts across these realizations. We demonstrate that the aggregate shaking regarding the mean macroseismic intensity estimates (from the ShakeMap output) is a biased representation of the aggregate shaking when shaking uncertainty is included. Incorporating shaking uncertainty can help to improve various downstream earthquake impact applications, such as the USGS Prompt Assessment of Global Earthquakes for Response (PAGER) overall earthquake fatality distribution or estimates of shaking-induced ground failure impacts from consequential earthquakes.

Earthquake Spectra Journal↗
USGS1976

Digital telemetry system network installation for the National Earthquake Information Service

A Digital Telemetry System Network, developed by the Albuquerque Seismological Laboratory, was installed for the USGS National Earthquake Information Service (NEIS) during January 1975. NEIS is located in Golden, Colorado. The initial Digital Telemetry System Network consists of four independent digital telemetry systems that provide wide area coverage over most of the United States. The four systems were installed between: Albuquerque, New Mexico to NEIS; St. Louis, Missouri to NEIS; Salt Lake City, Utah to NEIS; and Menlo Park, California to NEIS. Each digital telemetry system will transmit fourteen channels of high accuracy seismic data in a digital format over a standard C-1 grade telephone line. Digitized data words will have a resolution of eleven digital bits plus one sign bit. Each digital telemetry receiver, located at NEIS, will have the capacity to provide fourteen channels of seismic data in a digital format suitable for either on-line digital computer analysis or magnetic tape recording. In addition the data can be presented in an analog format suitable for recording on helicorders or develocorders. This network is the first large scale digital telemetry system used by the U.S. Geological Survey for the transmission of real time seismic data.

Open-File Report↗
USGS2026

Orientation dependence of probabilistic seismic hazard estimates from CyberShake physics-based simulations

Earthquake ground‐motion intensities, such as pseudospectral accelerations (SAs), can vary significantly with horizontal orientation. However, conducting probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA) for each horizontal orientation is challenging because current ground‐motion models used in PSHA consider only a single horizontal intensity value, usually the median across all orientations, known as RotD50. To address this limitation, we employ physics‐based simulations for PSHA, which contain full waveforms from which ground‐motion intensities can be computed for all horizontal orientations to study directional seismic hazard. We apply our approach to the latest CyberShake study of the Greater Los Angeles metropolitan area, developed by the Statewide California Earthquake Center, finding that seismic hazard at a 2475‐yr return period, a common value used for earthquake‐resistant design, varies significantly with horizontal orientation. For instance, for SAs at 3 s, the maximum seismic hazard across all horizontal orientations is, on average, 15% higher than the median RotD50 hazard, with these differences becoming more pronounced at longer periods. These observed variations can generally be attributed to physical mechanisms that polarize seismic waves, such as the radiation pattern of the earthquake source and the influence of the subsurface structure. These results may have important implications for earthquake engineering applications, particularly for long‐period structures in areas with substantial horizontal variations in seismic hazard.

California↗