USGS ScienceSearch

USGS · tm2A7

Protocol for Monitoring Fish Assemblages in Pacific Northwest National Parks

Abstract

Rivers and streams that drain from Olympic, Mount Rainier, and North Cascades National Parks are among the most protected corridors in the lower 48 States, and represent some of the largest tracts of contiguous, undisturbed habitat throughout the range of several key fish species of the Pacific Northwest. These watersheds are of high regional importance as freshwater habitat sanctuaries for native fish, where habitat conditions are characterized as having little to no disturbance from development, channelization, impervious surfaces, roads, diversions, or hydroelectric projects. Fishery resources are of high ecological and cultural importance in Pacific Northwest National Parks, and significantly contribute to economically important recreational, commercial, and tribal fisheries. This protocol describes procedures to monitor trends in fish assemblages, fish abundance, and water temperature in eight rivers and five wadeable streams in Olympic National Park during summer months, and is based on 4 years of field testing. Fish assemblages link freshwater, marine, and terrestrial ecosystems. They also serve as focal resources of national parks and are excellent indicators of ecological conditions of rivers and streams. Despite the vital importance of native anadromous and resident fish populations, there is no existing monitoring program for fish assemblages in the North Coast and Cascades Network. Specific monitoring objectives of this protocol are to determine seasonal and annual trends in: (1) fish species composition, (2) timing of migration of adult fish, (3) relative abundance, (4) age and size structure, (5) extent of non-native and hatchery fish, and (6) water temperature. To detect seasonal and annual trends in fish assemblages in reference sites, we rely on repeated and consistent annual sampling at each monitoring site. The general rationale for the repeated sampling of reference sites is to ensure that we account for the high interannual variability in fish movements and abundances in rivers. One underlying assumption is that the monitoring program is designed in perpetuity, and consequently our capability to detect trends substantially increases with time. The protocol describes sampling designs, methods, training procedures, safety considerations, data management, data analysis, and reporting. The allocation of sampling effort represents a balance between ecological considerations, a sound monitoring approach, and practical limitations caused by logistical constraints and a limited annual budget of $55,000. The widespread declines of native fish species in western North America highlights the importance and urgency of understanding trends in fish assemblages from undisturbed habitats. Seasonal and annual trends in fish assemblages will provide insights at the individual, population, and assemblage level. This protocol will allow managers to detect increases and decreases in abundance of priority management species, and occurrence of non-native, hatchery, and federally listed fish. The detection of trends in fish assemblages will allow for specific management actions that may include: implementation of more appropriate fishing regulations, evaluation of existing hatchery releases, control of non-native fish species, and prioritization of habitat restoration projects. Dissemination and communication of scientific findings on North Coast and Cascades Network fish assemblages will be a core product of this protocol, which will have much relevance to decision makers, park visitors, researchers, and educators.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 47.25° to 48.5° latitude; -125° to -122° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Samuel J. Brenkman, Patrick J. Connolly. 2008. Protocol for Monitoring Fish Assemblages in Pacific Northwest National Parks. https://doi.org/10.3133/tm2a7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

dMODELS, a MATLAB software package for modeling crustal deformation near volcanic centers and active faults using Global Navigation Satellite System data—User guide

dMODELS is a MATLAB software package that implements the most common analytical models used to interpret deformation measurements near faults and active volcanic centers. This manual focuses on inversion of deformation data from the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS). The included case studies emphasize the GNSS inversion component of the software. Source models include pressurized spherical, spheroidal, and horizontal sill (penny-crack) magma reservoirs in a homogeneous, elastic, isotropic, flat half-space. A topography correction is available for the spherical source. Dikes and faults are described following the mathematical notation for the rectangular dislocations in a homogeneous, elastic, flat half-space. Equations have been reviewed for typographical errors present in the original literature and verified against finite-element method numerical models. GNSS data from the 2006 eruption at Augustine Volcano, Alaska; the 1998–2000 unrest at Taal Volcano, Philippines; and the 2009 earthquake in L’Aquila, Italy, are used to demonstrate the application of the software package.

Techniques and Methods

Aspergillosis (Avian) case definition for wildlife

Diagnostic laboratories receive carcasses and samples for diagnostic evaluation and pathogen/toxin detection. Case definitions bring clarity and consistency to the evaluation process. Their use within and between organizations allows more uniform reporting of diseases and etiologic agents. The intent of a case definition is to provide scientifically based criteria for determining: (a) if an individual carcass has a specific disease and degree of confidence in that diagnosis and (b) if there is evidence of a pathogen or toxin in a carcass or sample (for example, swab, tissue sample, skin scraping, blood/serum sample, environmental sample, or other). This case definition is specific to aspergillosis and applies to all avian species.

Techniques and Methods

Field sampling guidelines for developing and verifying satellite remote sensing chlorophyll a concentration and fluorescence models in inland waters

Harmful algal blooms are increasing in frequency in inland waters across the United States, resulting in a need to monitor phytoplankton bloom events to track ecosystem health and productivity. Remote sensing of chlorophyll a values offers a cost-effective and powerful method for early detection and characterization of bloom events and serves as an overall indicator of water quality and trophic state, with regular, repeated sampling of landscape-wide, high spatial resolution measurements. Field measurements are necessary for developing and verifying chlorophyll a retrieval models. For model verification, chlorophyll a concentration or fluorescence and light attenuation measurements are needed; for model development, turbidity and colored dissolved organic matter concentration measurements are additionally needed; and for model development and verification, radiometric measurements, taxonomic identification of phytoplankton, inherent optical properties, and cyanotoxin concentration are further measurements that can provide context. This report outlines detailed methods and priority considerations for collecting high-quality field data in inland waters (defined as rivers, lakes, reservoirs, estuaries, streams, and wetlands). The described methods include best practices for collecting and preparing discretely collected water samples and for calibration, maintenance, and quality assurance and quality control of field sensors. Whereas the priorities will vary between applications, some general guidelines are to collect field samples (1) as close in time to a satellite overpass as possible, (2) from representative areas of the waterbody to capture the range of spatial variability, and (3) near the surface to match remote sensing reflectance data.

Techniques and Methods