Yucaipa valley integrated hydrological model

Ayman H. Alzraiee; John A. Engott; Geoffrey Cromwell; Linda R. Woolfenden

doi:10.3133/sir20215118b

Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · sir20215118B

Yucaipa valley integrated hydrological model

Ayman H. Alzraiee·John A. Engott·Geoffrey Cromwell·Linda R. Woolfenden

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Introduction The hydrologic system in the Yucaipa Valley watershed (YVW) was simulated using the coupled Groundwater and Surface-water FLOW model (GSFLOW; Markstrom and others, 2008). This study uses version 2.0 of GSFLOW, which is a combination of the Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System (PRMS; Markstrom and others, 2015), and the Newton-Raphson formulation of the Modular Groundwater-Flow Model (MODFLOW-NWT; hereafter referred to as MODFLOW; Harbaugh, 2005; Niswonger and others, 2011). GSFLOW partitions the hydrologic system into three regions (fig. B1) that are linked by the exchange of unsaturated and saturated groundwater and surface water. The properties and processes within each region influence the flow of both groundwater and surface water into, out of, and within each region. The PRMS component of GSFLOW simulates Region 1, and the MODFLOW component simulates Regions 2 and 3. In the YVW, GSFLOW was applied as the simulation code and is referred to herein as the Yucaipa Integrated Hydrologic Model (YIHM; Alzraiee and others, 2022). In the YIHM, Region 1 includes the plant canopy, snowpack, and the soil zone; Region 2 includes the stream network; and Region 3 includes the subsurface beneath Regions 1 and 2 and consists of both the saturated and unsaturated zones. Soil-moisture conditions and head relations control the flow of both groundwater and surface water between regions. The maximum lateral extents of Regions 1 and 3 were defined using the surface-water drainage divides described in the “Description of Study Area” section of chapter A of this report. The boundaries for Region 2 are the lowest elevation of the streambeds, the stream channel widths, and the horizontal extent of the stream channels in the YVW. Flow across the unsaturated part of Region 3 is assumed to be vertical and does not cross the lateral boundary. To simulate hydrologic processes occurring within the YVW using GSFLOW, a model domain was defined to match the surface watershed such that the domain includes each surficial hydrologic unit coinciding (at least partially) with the Yucaipa groundwater subbasin (hereafter referred to as “Yucaipa subbasin”) as defined in California Bulletin 118 (California Department of Water Resources, 2016). The resulting simulated domain (fig. B2) includes the Yucaipa subbasin and intersects partially with parts of the San Bernardino and San Timoteo groundwater subbasins (fig. B2). The area of the active model domain in YIHM is about 121 square miles (mi2). The developed YIHM can be used to improve understanding of the hydrologic processes in YVW and to simulate future management scenarios with different climatic and anthropogenic changes.

Explore related subjects

Scientific Investigations Report Report

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Ayman H. Alzraiee, John A. Engott, Geoffrey Cromwell, Linda R. Woolfenden. 2022-02-10. Yucaipa valley integrated hydrological model. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215118b

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Monitoring recreation on federally managed lands and waters—Aspects of visitor use

Federally managed public lands and waters receive around 1 billion recreational visits each year. Data on these visitors can aid in guiding policy decisions, managing resources effectively, and communicating the economic contributions of lands and waters. This report explores the methods used by agencies to collect data on aspects of recreational visitor use to Federal lands and waters (apart from visitation numbers, which are the focus of a companion publication). Aspects of recreational visitor use include visitor demographics, recreational activity participation, visitor satisfaction, visitor attitudes and experiences, trip characteristics, and economic contributions. We review practices used to understand aspects of visitor use across seven Federal agencies, revealing similarities such as the use of visitor intercept surveys and coverage of similar topic areas, and differences in how survey programs are operationalized and how specific questions on visitor surveys are worded. We also evaluate emerging technologies, such as geolocated social media and mobile device location data, for their potential to aid in understanding aspects of visitor use. This report concludes with potential opportunities to enhance data collection and coordination, ensuring cost-effective data collection and informed decision making.

Scientific Investigations Report↗

USGS2026

Evaluation of best management practices at an edge-of-field site in the Eagle Creek watershed, Ohio, 2012–20

In 2010, the U.S. Geological Survey worked in partnership with the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative and the Natural Resources Conservation Service to identify farm fields in priority watersheds—watersheds critically important to Great Lake health. Intensive best management practices were implemented in five States to test the efficacy of best management practices, also referred to as agricultural conservation practices, to reduce sediment and nutrient runoff on agricultural fields. These fields were chosen as representatives of the priority watersheds because their farming practices and geographical conditions were common among farms in those watersheds. A farm site located near Findlay, Ohio, in the Eagle Creek watershed used two conservation practices, cover crop (Natural Resources Conservation Service practice standard 340) and variable rate technology (VRT; Natural Resources Conservation Service practice standard 590), which represent common practices in the Maumee priority watershed. This study monitored surface runoff and subsurface tile runoff at the Eagle Creek watershed site. The effects of cover crop and VRT nutrient application on sediment and nutrient runoff were assessed from October 2012 to September 2020. Cover crops were applied in fall of 2016, 2017, and 2018, coinciding with VRT applications. The following parameters were analyzed as part of the study: runoff discharge; peak discharge; and concentrations and loads of total phosphorus, particulate phosphorus, dissolved reactive phosphorus, and suspended sediment. High peak runoff events disproportionally affected nutrient concentrations and loads in runoff. A threshold of the 85th percentile of the peak discharge was chosen to assess the effect of cover crop and VRT nutrient application on nutrient mitigation at each gage. Runoff events below the 85th percentile were considered small, and runoff events over the 85th percentile were considered large. Concentrations from collected water-quality samples were used for the analysis; estimated concentrations were excluded from the statistical evaluation. All surface runoff parameters during small runoff events, except surface runoff volume, were significantly lower in the period with cover crops and VRT implementation. Contrarily, subsurface runoff parameters during small events were not statistically different between the periods with and without cover crops and VRT implementation. Surface and subsurface parameters during large events were also not statistically different between the periods with and without cover crops and VRT implementation. These results indicate cover crops and VRT may improve water quality during small runoff events, but additional best management practices that mitigate large runoff events may lead to greater water-quality improvement given the contribution of large events to overall losses.

Ohio↗

USGS2026

Continuous monitoring and temporal variability of fluorescence of dissolved organic matter in karst groundwater of the Edwards aquifer, south-central Texas, 2019–24

Widespread urbanization on the Edwards aquifer recharge zone in south-central Texas has prompted the development of new approaches and tools for evaluating the current and future status of water quality in the San Antonio and Barton Springs segments of the Edwards aquifer. The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the San Antonio Water System and the City of Austin, applied continuous monitoring of fluorescence of dissolved organic matter (fDOM) to characterize the sources and transport of dissolved organic matter and associated constituents in the Edwards aquifer. Continuous fDOM time-series data were adjusted using empirically derived temperature, turbidity, and inner-filter-effect correction factors prior to analysis and interpretation. Fully corrected fDOM time-series data from the study sites were evaluated for short- and long-term temporal variability in fDOM in the context of the hydrologic and climatic conditions that occurred during the 5-year study period to understand vulnerability of the aquifer to potential contaminants in recharge. Study results indicate that fDOM is an effective proxy for dissolved organic carbon that, in turn, is indicative of the influx of recent surface water and associated contaminants, and thus, aquifer vulnerability to those contaminants. Although other continuously monitored water-quality parameters provide insights into changes in water quality in response to varying hydrologic conditions, the quantitative relation between fDOM and dissolved organic carbon directly indicates the timing and magnitude of pulses of organic constituents derived from the land surface, whereas other water-quality parameters do not.

Texas↗