USGS Science⌕ Search

USGS · sir20215063

Peak-flow variability, peak-flow informational needs, and consideration of regional regression analyses in managing the crest-stage gage network in Montana

Abstract

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the Montana Department of Transportation (MDT), has operated a crest-stage gage (CSG) network in Montana to collect peak-flow data since 1955. The CSG network is vital to collecting peak-flow data on small drainage basins that typically are not addressed by continuous streamflow operations. Discussions between USGS and MDT identified a need for evaluating the CSG network to allow for better decision making in the management of the network. The purpose of this report is to (1) generally describe peak-flow variability in Montana, (2) assess peak-flow informational needs relevant to MDT activities, and (3) consider the characteristics of the active CSG network in relation to addressing the informational needs. The evaluation of the CSG network is intended to assist in prioritization for discontinuation of CSGs and other activities involving changes to the CSG network. Peak-flow variability was investigated by analysis of selected peak-flow characteristics of 659 unregulated streamgages in or near Montana. A generalized peak-flow variability index ( PFVI ) was developed to provide large-scale representation of peak-flow variability in Montana. For unregulated Montana streamgages, PFVI generally monotonically decreases with increasing drainage area, although there is somewhat large (but generally consistent) variability about the locally weighted scatterplot smooth line. Presumably, highly variable small-scale hydroclimatic processes are integrated with increasing drainage area such that variability in many hydrologic characteristics is reduced. PFVI also decreases with increasing mean basin elevation and mean annual precipitation. Presumably, higher elevation and wetter hydroclimatic settings in Montana contribute to reduced variability in hydrologic characteristics. Intuitively, PFVI might be expected to generally decrease with increasing years of record because the standard deviation might typically be expected to decrease with increasing sample size. However, relations among PFVI and years of record are more complex and variable than drainage area, elevation, and precipitation. PFVI variably increases from 10 to about 40 years of record and then generally monotonically decreases from about 40 to about 105 years of record. Relations among PFVI and the years of record might be confounded by effects of drainage area because streamgages with long periods of record (greater than about 60 years) generally have large drainage areas (greater than about 100 square miles). The relations between PFVI and drainage area, mean basin elevation, mean annual precipitation, and years of record substantially differ among the eight hydrologic regions in Montana. As such, the PFVI relations were further investigated within each hydrologic region. A major use of peak-flow information by MDT is for design of road and highway infrastructure, including bridges, culverts, and roadside drainage ditches. As such, basin characteristics (including drainage area, mean basin elevation, and mean annual precipitation) of the Montana streamgage network (735 regulated and unregulated streamgages) were statistically investigated in relation to basin characteristics of 12,639 road and stream intersections in Montana. Both regulated and unregulated streamgages were investigated because the road and stream intersections are on both regulated and unregulated streams. Exploratory analyses indicated that the various relations substantially differ among the hydrologic regions. As such, the relations between the Montana streamgage network and the road and stream intersections were further investigated within each hydrologic region. An important objective of the CSG network is to provide data for developing regional regression equations (RREs) for estimating frequencies at ungaged sites in Montana. Various characteristics of the RREs substantially differ among the eight hydrologic regions in Montana. As such, the RRE characteristics were further investigated within each hydrologic region. For each of the eight hydrologic regions, various characteristics of peak-flow variability, peak-flow informational needs, and regional regression analyses were investigated in detail. Possible shortcomings of the streamgage network in each hydrologic region are identified and possible future improvements to the CSG network are presented.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 44.358221° to 49.00139° latitude; -116.050003° to -104.039563° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Steven K. Sando. 2021-07-28. Peak-flow variability, peak-flow informational needs, and consideration of regional regression analyses in managing the crest-stage gage network in Montana. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215063

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Baseline water-quality inventory and summary for the Paterson Great Falls National Historical Park, New Jersey

The Paterson Great Falls National Historical Park (PAGR), established in 2011 in the City of Paterson, New Jersey, contains many cultural, historical, and natural resources. Because of the PAGR’s young age and limited resources, a long record of natural resource data is not available for use to guide future park management and planning decisions. A detailed natural resource inventory was identified as an immediate need in the “Foundation Document—Paterson Great Falls National Historical Park,” given the history of extensive industrial activity throughout the PAGR and the Passaic River Basin. The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the National Park Service and the Urban Waters Federal Partnership for the Lower Passaic River, inventoried water-quality monitoring efforts and compiled historical water-quality data from secondary data sources to define baseline conditions in the PAGR and the surrounding study area. This report documents the methods used to harmonize water-quality data aggregated from multiple sources for the PAGR study area. Procedures implemented during data harmonization include compiling data from multiple sources, assessing the dataset for completeness, addressing metadata concerns, and creating a consistent and quality-assured dataset for future analysis. The harmonized dataset contains 14 aggregated surface-water sites, 1,103 individual sampling days, and 32,000 water-quality records throughout the period of record defined for this study (1952–2021). Summary statistics and comparison to water-quality criteria are provided for focus parameters that can support PAGR management, including field properties, suspended material, total dissolved solids, specific conductance, chloride, sulfate, Escherichia coli, nutrients, contaminants of concern related to fish consumption advisories, and litter and floatable debris. A spatial data gap was identified for the recreational area near the base of the Great Falls and immediately downstream from a known combined sewer overflow discharge location. Analytic data gaps were identified for continuous streamflow and water-quality parameters, floatable debris characterization, and harmful algal blooms identification. Continuous collection of contaminants of concern was identified as a temporal data gap, as these parameters were not consistently collected within the study area. The water-quality data synthesis and summary presented in this report can assist PAGR staff in understanding the complex baseline water resources within the study area and can serve as a baseline to design future water-quality monitoring efforts and evaluate changes in water quality over time. The harmonized dataset, as well as future New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and New Jersey Harbor Discharge Group monitoring data and assessments, can also be used to examine the status and trends in surface-water quality, support compliance with the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), and further investigate changes to park water resources that can affect ecological and human health.

New Jersey↗

Slip tendency and dilation tendency of Quaternary faults in the Great Basin region, Arizona, California, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, and Wyoming

This report presents the results of slip tendency and dilation tendency analysis of Quaternary faults in the Great Basin region, in the states of Arizona, California, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, and Wyoming. This effort was undertaken as part of two studies: the U.S. Department of Energy Geothermal Technologies Office-funded Innovative Geothermal Exploration through Novel Investigations of Undiscovered Systems (INGENIOUS) project, which is a multidisciplinary, multi-institution effort to develop new methodologies and best practices to accelerate the discovery of new, commercially viable hydrothermal resources; and the U.S. Geological Survey Geothermal Resources Investigations Project. The goal of this work is to identify faults and fault segments that are appropriately oriented to be stress-loaded for slip or to dilate under the ambient stress conditions. Both conditions may make such faults more likely to host permeability and fluid flow relative to other faults in the region. Slip tendency and dilation tendency were calculated for all fault segments in the study area from the U.S. Geological Survey Quaternary Fault and Fold Database. Results demonstrate that faults with high slip tendency and dilation tendency are common in the Great Basin region. The areas containing many high slip tendency and dilation tendency fault segments are associated with high strain rates. These areas also host a relatively high proportion of the known hydrothermal systems. This indicates that faults with high slip tendency and dilation tendency in areas with high strain-rate are potentially most prospective for hosting hydrothermal systems. The database published in coordination with this report contains the slip tendency and dilation tendency results data, including the fault geometry and stress data used to calculate these quantities, for both the Great Basin study area and the smaller INGENIOUS study area.

Arizona, California, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, ↗

A spatial analysis of the groundwater emergence flood hazard in Long Island, New York, and coastal areas surrounding Long Island Sound in New York, Connecticut, and Rhode Island

Long Island, New York, and nearby coastal areas surrounding Long Island Sound are densely populated and, like other coastal areas, are susceptible to flooding from several potential sources, including stormwater from precipitation events, tidal flooding and storm surge, and groundwater emergence flooding. Groundwater emergence fooding refers to the intersection of a rising water table with land surface or critical infrastructure. Many studies of flood drivers either neglect or only briefly discuss how shallow groundwater conditions may contribute to or exacerbate flood conditions. As a part of a comprehensive study of compound flood hazards in the coastal areas of Long Island and Long Island Sound, a spatial analysis was completed by the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Environmental Protection Agency’s Long Island Sound Partnership, formerly called the Long Island Sound Study, using available regional datasets to characterize the potential hazard for groundwater emergence flooding. The approximately 3,100 square mile study area was subdivided into 11,407 grid cells that were 900 meters by 900 meters (approximately 3,000 feet by 3,000 feet), for the purpose of integrating the spatial datasets to calculate and map the groundwater emergence flood hazard. The depth to the water table, hydrologic soil groups, and National Land Cover Database were harmonized to the common grid. A groundwater emergence flood hazard score was calculated for each grid cell for current average conditions following a set of rules accounting for the depth to the water table and the percentage of area within each cell with slow infiltrating soils. A scenario with a higher sea-level position was also calculated for the Long Island part of the study area. The calculated groundwater emergence flood hazard score was reviewed in conjunction with the National Land Cover Database to identify developed areas and associated infrastructure that may be at risk of potential groundwater emergence flooding. Study results indicate that the groundwater emergence flood hazard is highest in coastal areas and near surface water where the water table is close to ground surface. Inland areas away from surface waterbodies are not likely to be exposed to groundwater emergence flooding. For Long Island, in the scenario with higher sea-level position, a greater groundwater emergence flood hazard is calculated for some locations closer to the coast and where land is submerged. Away from the coast and surface-water drainage, the groundwater emergence flood hazard is similar between the current average sea-level condition and the higher sea-level position scenario.

Connecticut, New York, Rhode Island↗