Groundwater assessment for petroleum hydrocarbon compounds associated with Fuels Area C, Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, 2014–18

David A. Bender; Joel M. Galloway; Colton J. Medler

doi:10.3133/sir20215060

Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · sir20215060

Groundwater assessment for petroleum hydrocarbon compounds associated with Fuels Area C, Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, 2014–18

David A. Bender·Joel M. Galloway·Colton J. Medler

View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

In 2013, the U.S. Geological Survey began a study in cooperation with the Defense Logistics Agency and the U.S. Air Force to estimate groundwater-flow direction, install groundwater monitoring wells, and collect soil and groundwater samples for petroleum hydrocarbon compounds to identify the presence of hydrocarbon contamination at Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, specifically around Fuels Area C. Several fuel spills of diesel fuel, jet fuel, and other petroleum products were documented on or near Fuels Area C and several studies have been done to determine the extent of petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in the subsurface. Two-dimensional electrical resistivity tomography surveys were completed at Fuels Area C in 2014 to characterize subsurface materials and determine the depth to bedrock along survey lines. The depth to the top of the Pierre Shale from land surface along the four electrical resistivity tomography survey lines in Fuels area C ranged from about 5.4 to 8.7 meters. Resistivity lines and lithologic logs in wells in the area indicated mostly clay material with minor occurrences of sand and gravel. Discrete groundwater levels were collected between November 2014 and June 2018 at 14 monitoring wells for use in generating a potentiometric surface in the study area around Fuels Area C. The potentiometric contours indicated that groundwater flow was from the west to east or southwest to southeast around Fuels Area C. Soil and groundwater samples were collected at selected locations from 2014 to 2018 to better understand the presence and movement of petroleum hydrocarbons in the study area around Fuels Area C. Soil samples were collected at eight wells during installation in 2014 and three wells during installation in 2016. Groundwater samples were collected from 14 wells and a recovery sump around Fuels Area C from 2014 to 2018. Several petroleum hydrocarbon compounds were detected, but below action levels, in soil samples collected in 2014 and 2016. Benzene and toluene were not detected in any of the soil samples from the 11 monitoring well sites. Ethylbenzene and total xylenes were detected at sites 1 and 7. Naphthalene was detected in samples from five sites (sites 1, 5, 7, 8, and 9), but concentrations were less than the Tier 1 action level of 25 milligrams per kilogram. Gasoline-range organic compounds were detected in all soil samples collected during the installation of 11 groundwater monitoring wells within or near Fuels Area C in 2014 and 2016. Diesel-range organic compounds were detected in 9 out of the 11 soil samples collected at the 11 monitoring wells. Gasoline-range organic compound concentrations exceeded the Tier 2 assessment level for total petroleum hydrocarbons in soil samples from site 1 (5,200 milligrams per kilogram), site 5 (580 milligrams per kilogram), and site 9 (1,800 milligrams per kilogram); the remaining sites had concentrations below the Tier 2 assessment level for total petroleum hydrocarbons. The highest concentrations of diesel-range organic compounds in soil samples were from site 1 (3,600 milligrams per kilogram), site 5 (440 milligrams per kilogram), and site 14 (330 milligrams per kilogram), and only the sample from site 1 exceeded the Tier 2 assessment level for total petroleum hydrocarbons. Petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations were measured in samples collected from 14 groundwater monitoring wells and 1 recovery sump between 2014 and 2018 in the study area around Fuels Area C. Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX) compounds were detected in at least one sample collected from 10 of the 15 sites sampled in the study area from 2014 to 2018. Samples from monitoring well sites 2, 3, 6, 8, and 9 did not have any quantifiable concentrations of BTEX compounds. Multiple BTEX compounds were detected consistently in samples collected from sites 10 and 11. Few BTEX compounds were detected at sites outside of and downgradient from Fuels Area C (sites 12–14). Naphthalene was detected in 8 of the 15 sites sampled in the study area in 2014–18. Measurable concentrations of naphthalene generally were less than 5 micrograms per liter in wells sampled in the study area in 2014–18 except for samples collected at sites 5, 7, and 11. The variability of the presence of BTEX compounds and naphthalene in wells sampled in the study area during 2014–18 likely is caused by the variability in the subsurface material, local groundwater flow, operational fueling activities, and historical spills and releases in the area. The spatial and temporal variability in the BTEX compounds and naphthalene concentrations from samples collected from 2014 to 2018 do not indicate a consistent pattern of subsurface flow or contaminate movement that would be expected if a contaminant plume migrated with the flow and movement of groundwater. Gasoline-range organic and diesel-range organic compounds were detected in most of the groundwater samples collected in the study area around Fuels Area C in 2014–18; however, concentrations were often less than the laboratory reporting level. Median gasoline-range organic compound concentrations were greater than the laboratory reporting level at sites 1, 5, 9, 10, and 11. The highest concentrations of gasoline-range organic and diesel-range organic compounds generally were observed in samples collected from sites 10 and 11. Gasoline-range organic compound concentrations ranged from 1,500 to 9,700 micrograms per liter at site 10 and from less than 100 to 13,000 micrograms per liter at site 11. Diesel-range organic compound concentrations ranged from 9,600 to 55,000 micrograms per liter at site 10 and from 560 to 7,300 micrograms per liter at site 11.

Explore related subjects

Scientific Investigations Report Report

Source-reported bounding extent: 44.104598040381106° to 44.17974184575526° latitude; -103.15235137939453° to -103.03321838378906° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

David A. Bender, Joel M. Galloway, Colton J. Medler. 2021-08-02. Groundwater assessment for petroleum hydrocarbon compounds associated with Fuels Area C, Ellsworth Air Force Base, South Dakota, 2014–18. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20215060

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Baseline water-quality inventory and summary for the Paterson Great Falls National Historical Park, New Jersey

The Paterson Great Falls National Historical Park (PAGR), established in 2011 in the City of Paterson, New Jersey, contains many cultural, historical, and natural resources. Because of the PAGR’s young age and limited resources, a long record of natural resource data is not available for use to guide future park management and planning decisions. A detailed natural resource inventory was identified as an immediate need in the “Foundation Document—Paterson Great Falls National Historical Park,” given the history of extensive industrial activity throughout the PAGR and the Passaic River Basin. The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the National Park Service and the Urban Waters Federal Partnership for the Lower Passaic River, inventoried water-quality monitoring efforts and compiled historical water-quality data from secondary data sources to define baseline conditions in the PAGR and the surrounding study area. This report documents the methods used to harmonize water-quality data aggregated from multiple sources for the PAGR study area. Procedures implemented during data harmonization include compiling data from multiple sources, assessing the dataset for completeness, addressing metadata concerns, and creating a consistent and quality-assured dataset for future analysis. The harmonized dataset contains 14 aggregated surface-water sites, 1,103 individual sampling days, and 32,000 water-quality records throughout the period of record defined for this study (1952–2021). Summary statistics and comparison to water-quality criteria are provided for focus parameters that can support PAGR management, including field properties, suspended material, total dissolved solids, specific conductance, chloride, sulfate, Escherichia coli, nutrients, contaminants of concern related to fish consumption advisories, and litter and floatable debris. A spatial data gap was identified for the recreational area near the base of the Great Falls and immediately downstream from a known combined sewer overflow discharge location. Analytic data gaps were identified for continuous streamflow and water-quality parameters, floatable debris characterization, and harmful algal blooms identification. Continuous collection of contaminants of concern was identified as a temporal data gap, as these parameters were not consistently collected within the study area. The water-quality data synthesis and summary presented in this report can assist PAGR staff in understanding the complex baseline water resources within the study area and can serve as a baseline to design future water-quality monitoring efforts and evaluate changes in water quality over time. The harmonized dataset, as well as future New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and New Jersey Harbor Discharge Group monitoring data and assessments, can also be used to examine the status and trends in surface-water quality, support compliance with the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), and further investigate changes to park water resources that can affect ecological and human health.

New Jersey↗

USGS2026

Slip tendency and dilation tendency of Quaternary faults in the Great Basin region, Arizona, California, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, and Wyoming

This report presents the results of slip tendency and dilation tendency analysis of Quaternary faults in the Great Basin region, in the states of Arizona, California, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, and Wyoming. This effort was undertaken as part of two studies: the U.S. Department of Energy Geothermal Technologies Office-funded Innovative Geothermal Exploration through Novel Investigations of Undiscovered Systems (INGENIOUS) project, which is a multidisciplinary, multi-institution effort to develop new methodologies and best practices to accelerate the discovery of new, commercially viable hydrothermal resources; and the U.S. Geological Survey Geothermal Resources Investigations Project. The goal of this work is to identify faults and fault segments that are appropriately oriented to be stress-loaded for slip or to dilate under the ambient stress conditions. Both conditions may make such faults more likely to host permeability and fluid flow relative to other faults in the region. Slip tendency and dilation tendency were calculated for all fault segments in the study area from the U.S. Geological Survey Quaternary Fault and Fold Database. Results demonstrate that faults with high slip tendency and dilation tendency are common in the Great Basin region. The areas containing many high slip tendency and dilation tendency fault segments are associated with high strain rates. These areas also host a relatively high proportion of the known hydrothermal systems. This indicates that faults with high slip tendency and dilation tendency in areas with high strain-rate are potentially most prospective for hosting hydrothermal systems. The database published in coordination with this report contains the slip tendency and dilation tendency results data, including the fault geometry and stress data used to calculate these quantities, for both the Great Basin study area and the smaller INGENIOUS study area.

Arizona, California, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, ↗

USGS2026

A spatial analysis of the groundwater emergence flood hazard in Long Island, New York, and coastal areas surrounding Long Island Sound in New York, Connecticut, and Rhode Island

Long Island, New York, and nearby coastal areas surrounding Long Island Sound are densely populated and, like other coastal areas, are susceptible to flooding from several potential sources, including stormwater from precipitation events, tidal flooding and storm surge, and groundwater emergence flooding. Groundwater emergence fooding refers to the intersection of a rising water table with land surface or critical infrastructure. Many studies of flood drivers either neglect or only briefly discuss how shallow groundwater conditions may contribute to or exacerbate flood conditions. As a part of a comprehensive study of compound flood hazards in the coastal areas of Long Island and Long Island Sound, a spatial analysis was completed by the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Environmental Protection Agency’s Long Island Sound Partnership, formerly called the Long Island Sound Study, using available regional datasets to characterize the potential hazard for groundwater emergence flooding. The approximately 3,100 square mile study area was subdivided into 11,407 grid cells that were 900 meters by 900 meters (approximately 3,000 feet by 3,000 feet), for the purpose of integrating the spatial datasets to calculate and map the groundwater emergence flood hazard. The depth to the water table, hydrologic soil groups, and National Land Cover Database were harmonized to the common grid. A groundwater emergence flood hazard score was calculated for each grid cell for current average conditions following a set of rules accounting for the depth to the water table and the percentage of area within each cell with slow infiltrating soils. A scenario with a higher sea-level position was also calculated for the Long Island part of the study area. The calculated groundwater emergence flood hazard score was reviewed in conjunction with the National Land Cover Database to identify developed areas and associated infrastructure that may be at risk of potential groundwater emergence flooding. Study results indicate that the groundwater emergence flood hazard is highest in coastal areas and near surface water where the water table is close to ground surface. Inland areas away from surface waterbodies are not likely to be exposed to groundwater emergence flooding. For Long Island, in the scenario with higher sea-level position, a greater groundwater emergence flood hazard is calculated for some locations closer to the coast and where land is submerged. Away from the coast and surface-water drainage, the groundwater emergence flood hazard is similar between the current average sea-level condition and the higher sea-level position scenario.

Connecticut, New York, Rhode Island↗