USGS Science⌕ Search

USGS · sir20115086

Numerical simulation of the groundwater-flow system in the Chambers-Clover Creek Watershed and Vicinity, Pierce County, Washington

Abstract

A groundwater-flow model was developed to contribute to an improved understanding of water resources in the Chambers-Clover Creek Watershed. The model covers an area of about 491 square miles in western Pierce County, Washington, and is bounded to the northeast by the Puyallup River valley, to the southwest by the Nisqually River valley, and extends northwest to Puget Sound, and southeast to Tanwax Creek. The Puyallup and Nisqually Rivers occupy large, relatively flat alluvial valleys that are separated by a broad, poorly drained, upland area that covers most of the model area. Chambers and Clover Creeks drain much of the central uplands and flow westward to Puget Sound. The model area is underlain by a northwest-thickening sequence of unconsolidated glacial (till and outwash) and interglacial (fluvial and lacustrine) deposits. Ten unconsolidated hydrogeologic units in the model area form the basis of the groundwater-flow model. Groundwater flow in the Chambers-Clover Creek Watershed and vicinity was simulated using the groundwater-flow model, MODFLOW-2000. The finite-difference model grid comprises 146 rows, 132 columns, and 11 layers. Each model cell has a horizontal dimension of 1,000 by 1,000 feet, and the model contains a total of 123,602 active cells. The thickness of model layers varies throughout the model area and ranges from 1.5 feet in the A3 aquifer unit to 1,567 feet in the G undifferentiated unit. Groundwater flow was simulated for both steady-state and transient conditions. Steady-state conditions were simulated using average recharge, discharge, and water levels for the 24-month period September 2006-August 2008. Transient conditions were simulated for the period September 2006-August 2008 using 24 monthly stress periods. Resource managers and local stakeholders intend to use the model to evaluate a range of water resource issues under both steady-state and transient conditions. Initial conditions for the transient model were developed from a 3-year "lead-in" period that used recorded precipitation and river levels, and temporal extrapolations of other boundary conditions. During model calibration, variables were adjusted within probable ranges to minimize differences between measured and simulated groundwater levels and stream baseflows. The model as calibrated to steady-state conditions has a standard deviation for heads and flows of 28.42 feet and 2.12 cubic feet per second, respectively; the model as calibrated to transient conditions has a standard deviation for heads and flows of 23.01 feet and 2.67 cubic feet per second, respectively. Simulated steady-state inflow to the model area from precipitation and secondary recharge was 477,266 acre-feet per year (acre-ft/yr) (79 percent of total simulated inflow), and simulated inflow from stream and lake leakage was 129,778 acre-ft/yr (21 percent of total simulated inflow). Simulated outflow from the model primarily was through discharge to streams, lakes, springs, seeps, and Puget Sound (559,192 acre-ft/yr; 92 percent of total simulated outflow), and withdrawals from wells (47,863 acre-ft/yr; 8 percent of total simulated outflow). Six scenarios were formulated and simulated using the calibrated model to provide representative examples of how the model can be used to evaluate the effects on groundwater levels and stream baseflows of potential changes in groundwater withdrawals, in consumptive use, and in recharge.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 46.784166666666664° to 47.333333333333336° latitude; -122.75° to -122.08333333333333° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kenneth H. Johnson, Mark E. Savoca, Burt Clothier. 2011. Numerical simulation of the groundwater-flow system in the Chambers-Clover Creek Watershed and Vicinity, Pierce County, Washington. https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20115086

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Magnitude and frequency of urban floods in Alabama and Mississippi using data through the 2024 water year

To improve flood-frequency estimates for urban streams in Alabama and Mississippi, the U.S Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Alabama and Mississippi Departments of Transportation, estimated streamflows corresponding to selected annual exceedance probabilities (AEPs) for 64 streamgages on urban streams in the two States—48 in Alabama and 16 in Mississippi. Using estimates from 42 of the 64 streamgages, regression equations were developed that can be used to predict streamflows corresponding to the selected AEPs at ungaged locations on urban streams. Annual peak-flow data through September 2024 were used in the at-site flood-frequency analyses. Drainage area and the percentage of developed land use in the drainage basins of the streamgages (from the 2011 National Land Cover Database) were identified as statistically significant explanatory variables. Pseudo coefficient of determination (pseudo-R2) values ranged from 81 percent for the 0.2-percent AEP (500-year flood) to 91 percent for the 4- and 2-percent AEPs (25- and 50-year floods, respectively). Standard errors of prediction ranged from 23.1 percent for the 4-percent AEP (25-year flood) to 36.1 percent for the 2-percent AEP (500-year flood).

Alabama, Mississippi↗

Phosphorus concentrations and loads in two Mississippi Alluvial Plain watersheds following nutrient reduction efforts during 2010–22

The Mississippi Alluvial Plain ecoregion in Mississippi was historically part of the largest continuous wetland in North America but was clearcut and converted to row crop agriculture beginning in the late 1800s. To reduce the effects of agriculture on surface waters in the Mississippi Alluvial Plain, nutrient reduction best management practices have been implemented throughout the region, particularly in two small watersheds: Harris Bayou watershed (174.04 square kilometers) and Porter Bayou watershed (267.15 square kilometers). Since 2009, the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality, has collected water-quality samples monthly and during high-flow runoff events, at three locations within each watershed to monitor and assess nutrient trends following best management practice implementation. Here, we have analyzed long-term and seasonal trends in discharge, total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP) concentrations and loads using a combination of quantile-Kendall analysis, quantile regression, generalized additive models, and weighted regression on time, discharge, and season. In Harris Bayou watershed, discharge values at a ~0.4–0.5 daily nonexceedance probability increased by 15 percent per year at the uppermost monitoring site. Additionally, TN concentrations decreased throughout the watershed over time, particularly in the spring and winter months. Reductions in TP were less apparent and only observed at one sampling location in Harris Bayou watershed. Nutrient concentrations in Porter Bayou watershed remained consistent over time and increased at one sampling location. However, despite discrepancies in concentration trends, flow-normalized TN and TP loads consistently decreased over time in both watersheds. At the mouth of both watersheds, peak TN and TP loads decreased between 37.7 and 56.9 percent. Collectively, these results provide evidence that best management practices may help reduce the effect of agricultural practices in the region, particularly in Harris Bayou watershed. Additionally, management efforts resulted in greater reductions in TN concentrations than in TP concentrations.

Scientific Investigations Report↗

Streamflow, water quality, and energy development characteristics and water-quality trends for selected sites in the Green River and Muddy Creek drainage basins, southwestern Wyoming, water years 2006–16

Energy resource development in southwestern Wyoming has been rapidly expanding since the early 2000s to include innovative technologies for extracting oil and gas and enhancing renewable energy. In response to concerns about the potential negative effects of energy development on natural resources, the Wyoming Landscape Conservation Initiative was created to implement a long-term, science-based program of assessing, conserving, and enhancing fish and wildlife habitats while facilitating responsible energy development through local collaborations and partnerships. The U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the Bureau of Land Management, began monitoring streamflow and water quality as part of this initiative in 2006 at four U.S. Geological Survey streamgages within the Green River and Muddy Creek drainage basins to characterize the effects of energy development on streamflow and water quality in these areas. To quantify changes in water quality metrics, trend analyses for the 2006–16 water years were calculated and related to drainage basin characteristics including energy development (wells per square mile). Effects of energy development on water quality varied by watershed and the variability was driven primarily by the runoff efficiency and the geochemistry of the drainage basin. The New Fork River water chemistry was a calcium-bicarbonate type with low ionic strength and showed no statistically significant trends in water quality despite increased energy development. The Green River experienced moderate energy development, with significant upward trends in magnesium and alkalinity, indicating low sensitivity to development. Muddy Creek near Dad had minimal energy development and complex hydrogeochemical characteristics, showing mixed trends in water quality constituents. Muddy Creek near Baggs experienced moderate energy development, with significant upward trends in several water quality indicators indicating a response to the land disturbance associated with development. Overall, geochemistry and runoff efficiency influenced the vulnerability of water quality to energy development activities, highlighting the importance of drainage basin physical characteristics on vulnerability to development.

Scientific Investigations Report↗