USGS ScienceSearch

USGS · ofr90172

Streamflow gains and losses in the Snake River and ground-water budgets for the Snake River Plain, Idaho and eastern Oregon

Abstract

The Snake River is the regional drain for streams and aquifers in the Snake River basin upstream from Weiser, Idaho. The interaction between the river and ground water was quantified as streamflow gains from and losses to the aquifers. Upstream from Milner, Idaho, the Snake River both gains and loses water. Some reaches gain or lose throughout the year; other reaches gain during the irrigation season when ground-water levels rise as a result of application of surface water for irrigation but lose during the rest of the year. The largest continuous streamflow gain upstream from Milner is from springs between Blackfoot and Neeley, where, in 1980, the Snake River gained 1.9 million acre-feet of ground water. Downstream from Milner, the Snake River is a gaining stream. Gains arc largest between Milner and King Hill where numerous springs discharge to the river. In 1980, the Snake River gained 4.7 million acre-feet of ground water between Milner and King Hill. Although large springs were present in the Blackfoot-to-Neeley and Milner-to-King Hill reaches before irrigation began on the plain, the application of surface water for irrigation increased recharge to the Snake River Plain aquifer; therefore, spring discharge to both reaches also increased. However, despite changes in irrigated acreage and corresponding changes in the amount of water potentially available for recharge, spring discharge between Blackfoot and Neeley has remained relatively stable for 69 years (1912-80). During the same period, discharge from individual springs and total ground-water discharge between Milner and King Hill have increased and decreased substantially in quantities that can be attributed to changes in irrigation. The changes in ground-water recharge and discharge and ground-water storage generally are the net result of 100 successive years of irrigation on the Snake River Plain. Water-budget analyses indicate that the total volume of ground water in storage in the main part of the eastern Snake River Plain increased about 24 million acre-feet from 1880 to 1952, largely as a result of increased recharge in areas irrigated with surface water. The total volume of ground water in storage decreased about 6 million acre-feet from 1952 to 1980 as a result of several years of below-normal precipitation, increased pumping of ground water for irrigation, and other changes in irrigation practices. Ground-water storage in parts of the western plain increased about 3 million acre-feet from 1930 to 1972 but generally has decreased since 1972.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 42.917417775425065° to 44.35932911530625° latitude; -117.4387701391912° to -115.58595635851302° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L.C. Kjelstrom. 1992. Streamflow gains and losses in the Snake River and ground-water budgets for the Snake River Plain, Idaho and eastern Oregon. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr90172

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Estimating aftershock risk for entry into earthquake-damaged buildings

We present a simple method to estimate the risk of experiencing strong shaking from aftershocks during entry into earthquake-damaged buildings. We compute wait times until the probability of strong ground shaking from aftershocks reaches a predefined risk threshold; for example, a 0.4 percent probability of experiencing Modified Mercalli Intensity 7 or greater shaking during the planned building entry. We also develop a relation between aftershock probability and the probability of strong shaking, so that users can reference the U.S. Geological Survey aftershock forecast during an ongoing aftershock sequence to determine if the risk threshold has been met. We apply our method to active continental regions (for example, the Western United States), stable continental regions (for example, the Central and Eastern United States), and subduction zones (for example, Cascadia or Alaska).

Open-File Report

End-user needs for remote sensing wetlands of the Prairie Pothole Region of North America

The Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) of North America comprises globally important grassland and wetland ecosystems critical for numerous populations of migratory birds. Due to the importance of this region for migratory birds, and particularly waterfowl, and the threats of habitat loss due to intensifying agriculture, there is a mature and diverse system of conservation organizations, agencies, and partnerships that spends hundreds of millions of dollars annually on habitat conservation to support migratory bird populations. Remote sensing can be a powerful tool for observing and evaluating global change at large scales as well as expanding inferences from field studies to the broader landscape with statistical models. However, development and utilization of these tools has lagged behind their demand for several reasons, including concerns over spatial and temporal resolution and accuracy of products; perception of a misalignment with decision-maker needs; technological barriers such as skill sets of conservation professionals, computing resources, data access, and usability. In this report, we summarize the needs of conservation professionals and scientists who use or want to use remote sensing data products to inform science about wetland change and conservation of wetlands in the PPR. We assembled this information through several methods leading up to, during, and following a January 2026 PPR Wetland Remote Sensing Workshop. The workshop included United States and Canadian scientists, conservation professionals, and policy experts. Our goal was to bring together end-users and remote sensing product developers jointly to explore reducing the lag between product development and utilization of products to inform science and conservation. Specifically, we aimed to identify gaps in wetland remote sensing that limit effective monitoring, management, and conservation in the PPR, and to develop a framework that outlines pathways to address these gaps by fostering collaboration, improving communication networks, encouraging discussion, and building on existing and ongoing efforts. This report summarizes our participants’ descriptions of end-user needs and the outcomes of the workshop.

Prairie Pothole region

Bathymetric survey and storage capacity of Upper Lake Mary near Flagstaff, Arizona in 2024

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the city of Flagstaff, collected bathymetric, light detection and ranging (lidar), and land-survey data of Upper Lake Mary in Arizona during the months of April and October 2024. The city of Flagstaff uses a combination of groundwater from well fields throughout the Flagstaff area and surface water, mainly from Upper Lake Mary, for its potable water supply. The purpose of the survey is to update previous surveys using new technology and compare the results to previous surveys to determine if there was a decrease in storage capacity that could affect the city’s water supply. The lakebed was mapped in April 2024 using a vessel equipped with a multibeam echosounder (MBES) and mobile lidar scanner with positioning captured using a real-time kinematic global navigation satellite system (RTK GNSS) base and receivers. In October 2024, areas of the reservoir that were too shallow for the boat and shoreline that were not captured by the vessel-based lidar were surveyed on foot using hand-held RTK GNSS receivers. At full pool (spillway elevation of 6,831.82 feet above NAVD 88 [2,082.34 meters (m)], Upper Lake Mary has a storage capacity of 16,449.80 acre-feet (20,290,611.73 cubic meters) and a surface area of 953.57 acres (3,860,926.075 square meters). The reservoir is 5.7 miles (9.7 kilometers) long and varies in width from 326 feet (99.36 m) near the central, narrow portion of the reservoir to 2,613 feet (796.44 m) in the upper portion. Comparisons between this survey and the previous two surveys from the 1950s and 2006 indicate no apparent decrease in reservoir area or storage capacity. Results of the 2024 survey indicate that Upper Lake Mary’s storage capacity increased by 0.9 percent from the 2006 survey and a 1.6 percent increase in surface area from the 2006 survey.

Arizona