USGS ScienceSearch

USGS · ofr83332

Reconnaissance geologic map of the Harrat Tuffil Quadrangle, sheet 20/39 B, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Abstract

The Harrat Tuffil quadrangle, sheet 20/39 B, is located between lat 20°30’ and 21°00’ N. and long 39°30’ and 40°00’ E. about 50 km southeast of Jiddah. A western belt of Proterozoic metapelites and related rocks, defined as the Sa’diyah formation, structurally underlies and locally is interlayered with Proterozoic metabasaltic rocks of oceanic chemical affinity to the east. The Sa’diyah formation and the metabasaltic rocks are tentatively correlated with the Sabya formation and Baish group. These rocks may represent a miogeosynclinal tectonic setting in the 800 to 850 Ma period of development of the southwestern Arabian Shield. The presence of aluminous metasediments suggest a continental source area, probably west of oceanic and (or) immature island-arc rocks of the Baish(?) igneous suite. The Sa’diyah formation and metabasaltic rocks are intruded by a granite gneiss batholith, probably about 600 Ma old, and by small plutons of granodiorite and syenogranite. Peraluminous monzogranite occurs within the western part of the Sa’diyah formation belt and may provide an alternate source for the aluminous politic rocks. Tentative correlation of an isolated exposure of Jurassic(?) dolomite with the Hanifa Formation significantly extends the areal range of possible Jurassic sedimentary rocks in the Tihamat province. An intense dike swarm intrudes all of the pre-Miocene rocks in the quadrangle. This Damm dike complex is named for Wadi ad Damm. Dike chemistry shows both subalkaline and alkaline bimodal suites. The Sita formation is broadly coeval with the Damm Dike complex and contains volcanic rocks with similar bimodal chemistry. The Sita formation conformably overlies and is locally interbedded with the Sumaysi formation, which is palynologically dated in the Makkah quadrangle as Eocene (~50 Ma). Potassium-argon dating indicated intrusion and volcanism over the period ~50Ma to ~20 Ma ago. The Tertiary volcanic, hypabyssal, and plutonic rocks are all light rare-earth element enriched as would be expected in a rift-related tectonic setting. These rocks represent proto-Red Sea igneous activity and are correlated with the Jizan group. Shama rhyolite near Harrat Tuffil is unconformably overlain by a boulder conglomerate correlated with the Bathan formation. Miocene alkali basalt forms a large paleovalley-fill lava flow at Harrat ad Damm and small flow remnants north of Jabal Sita. Erosional downcutting at Harrat ad Damm averaged ~10 m per MA over the past 11 Ma. Pliocene alkali basalt unconformably overlies Bathan formation and Shama rhyolite at Harrat Tuffil. The uplift of Quaternary reef limestone along the Red Sea coast indicates recent faulting as shown in the adjoining Shu’ayba and Al Ghalah quadrangles. A perlite deposit at Jabal Shama may be suitable as light aggregate for concrete. Sparse barite veins were discovered in the lower Shumaysi formation. Relatively small deposits of Sa’diyah formation marble may be of interest for local use in building or cement. The Jurassic dolomite is locally quite pure and may have economic applications.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 20.5° to 21° latitude; 39.5° to 40° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

John S. Pallister. 1983. Reconnaissance geologic map of the Harrat Tuffil Quadrangle, sheet 20/39 B, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr83332

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Estimating aftershock risk for entry into earthquake-damaged buildings

We present a simple method to estimate the risk of experiencing strong shaking from aftershocks during entry into earthquake-damaged buildings. We compute wait times until the probability of strong ground shaking from aftershocks reaches a predefined risk threshold; for example, a 0.4 percent probability of experiencing Modified Mercalli Intensity 7 or greater shaking during the planned building entry. We also develop a relation between aftershock probability and the probability of strong shaking, so that users can reference the U.S. Geological Survey aftershock forecast during an ongoing aftershock sequence to determine if the risk threshold has been met. We apply our method to active continental regions (for example, the Western United States), stable continental regions (for example, the Central and Eastern United States), and subduction zones (for example, Cascadia or Alaska).

Open-File Report

End-user needs for remote sensing wetlands of the Prairie Pothole Region of North America

The Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) of North America comprises globally important grassland and wetland ecosystems critical for numerous populations of migratory birds. Due to the importance of this region for migratory birds, and particularly waterfowl, and the threats of habitat loss due to intensifying agriculture, there is a mature and diverse system of conservation organizations, agencies, and partnerships that spends hundreds of millions of dollars annually on habitat conservation to support migratory bird populations. Remote sensing can be a powerful tool for observing and evaluating global change at large scales as well as expanding inferences from field studies to the broader landscape with statistical models. However, development and utilization of these tools has lagged behind their demand for several reasons, including concerns over spatial and temporal resolution and accuracy of products; perception of a misalignment with decision-maker needs; technological barriers such as skill sets of conservation professionals, computing resources, data access, and usability. In this report, we summarize the needs of conservation professionals and scientists who use or want to use remote sensing data products to inform science about wetland change and conservation of wetlands in the PPR. We assembled this information through several methods leading up to, during, and following a January 2026 PPR Wetland Remote Sensing Workshop. The workshop included United States and Canadian scientists, conservation professionals, and policy experts. Our goal was to bring together end-users and remote sensing product developers jointly to explore reducing the lag between product development and utilization of products to inform science and conservation. Specifically, we aimed to identify gaps in wetland remote sensing that limit effective monitoring, management, and conservation in the PPR, and to develop a framework that outlines pathways to address these gaps by fostering collaboration, improving communication networks, encouraging discussion, and building on existing and ongoing efforts. This report summarizes our participants’ descriptions of end-user needs and the outcomes of the workshop.

Prairie Pothole region

Bathymetric survey and storage capacity of Upper Lake Mary near Flagstaff, Arizona in 2024

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the city of Flagstaff, collected bathymetric, light detection and ranging (lidar), and land-survey data of Upper Lake Mary in Arizona during the months of April and October 2024. The city of Flagstaff uses a combination of groundwater from well fields throughout the Flagstaff area and surface water, mainly from Upper Lake Mary, for its potable water supply. The purpose of the survey is to update previous surveys using new technology and compare the results to previous surveys to determine if there was a decrease in storage capacity that could affect the city’s water supply. The lakebed was mapped in April 2024 using a vessel equipped with a multibeam echosounder (MBES) and mobile lidar scanner with positioning captured using a real-time kinematic global navigation satellite system (RTK GNSS) base and receivers. In October 2024, areas of the reservoir that were too shallow for the boat and shoreline that were not captured by the vessel-based lidar were surveyed on foot using hand-held RTK GNSS receivers. At full pool (spillway elevation of 6,831.82 feet above NAVD 88 [2,082.34 meters (m)], Upper Lake Mary has a storage capacity of 16,449.80 acre-feet (20,290,611.73 cubic meters) and a surface area of 953.57 acres (3,860,926.075 square meters). The reservoir is 5.7 miles (9.7 kilometers) long and varies in width from 326 feet (99.36 m) near the central, narrow portion of the reservoir to 2,613 feet (796.44 m) in the upper portion. Comparisons between this survey and the previous two surveys from the 1950s and 2006 indicate no apparent decrease in reservoir area or storage capacity. Results of the 2024 survey indicate that Upper Lake Mary’s storage capacity increased by 0.9 percent from the 2006 survey and a 1.6 percent increase in surface area from the 2006 survey.

Arizona