USGS ScienceSearch

USGS · ofr7142

The vertical gradient of gravity in vertical and near vertical boreholes

Abstract

The vertical gradient of gravity is the rate of change of gravity in the direction of the plumb line. For a vertical borehole interval, it is approximated by the ratio of the gravity difference to the height difference as measured between the end points of the interval. The borehole vertical gradient is strongly affected by the densities of the rocks laterally adjacent to the well. Because of this useful effect, vertical (gravimetric) density profiles of the rooks adjacent to the borehole can be calculated from the borehole vertical gradients. A second useful effect, termed the "anomalous" vertical gradient, is caused by non-level equal-density surfaces related to the local and regional geology. The anomalous vertical gradient can enhance exploration beyond the confines of the borehole although it is a small and commonly negligible effect. These two useful effects are not determinable with absolute accuracy from observed borehole vertical gradients without independent subsurface rock density and (or) surface gravity information. In this study observed vertical gradients from high-precision, detailed gravity surveys made in seven shallow oil wells that penetrate a late Cenozoic sequence of marine and non-marine rocks in the Midway-Sunset Oil Field, California, are interpreted to obtain vertical density profiles. These gravimetric density profiles are adjusted 1) for anomalous vertical gradients calculated from surface gravity maps end, alternatively, measured on a portable tower and 2) for small extraneous effects of surface topography. The unadjusted and adjusted density profiles are compared with density measurements of core samples. The unadjusted density profiles of six wells are on the average systematically greater than core densities by .05 g/cm 3 . Adjusted profiles for the same wells agree with core densities to within .01 g/cm 3 on the average. Densities of an adjusted profile of a seventh well are .15 g/cm 3 less than those of the unadjusted profile and are in better agreement with core densities by that amount. However, residual systematic discrepancies between core and gravimetric densities for this seventh well indicate a measurable variation of the anomalous vertical gradient with depth and (or) lack of representative core density data. Topographic effects and anomalous vertical gradients in boreholes are usually small and change slowly with depth but, in some instances, may be comparatively large and change rapidly with depth. In the former case, gravimetric density profiles unadjusted for these effects can be in error by as much as about .05 g/cm 3 and, in the latter case, by as much as several tenths of a g/cm 3 . In both cases, relative errors between neighboring parts of the density profiles are much smaller. In cases where the anomalous vertical gradient changes appreciably with depth, it cannot be reliably estimated in the borehole from surface gravity measurements or from tower gradient measurements, which are especially sensitive to very shallow local density irregularities. At any borehole depth the anomalous gradient can be estimated from the difference between core and gravimetric densities of the same borehole interval. The core densities must be highly accurate and representative of the interval and the gravimetric density must he adjusted for topographic effects. Measured borehole vertical gradients have precisions of .00025 to .00050 mgal/ft (8 to 16 Eotvos units) for vertical intervals as small as 10 feet (3 meters); this meets the most stringent requirements of recognized applications for borehole gravimetry. An ideal borehole density logging device would be an in-motion continuously recording vertical gravity gradiometer.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Larry A. Beyer. 1971. The vertical gradient of gravity in vertical and near vertical boreholes. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr7142

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Estimating aftershock risk for entry into earthquake-damaged buildings

We present a simple method to estimate the risk of experiencing strong shaking from aftershocks during entry into earthquake-damaged buildings. We compute wait times until the probability of strong ground shaking from aftershocks reaches a predefined risk threshold; for example, a 0.4 percent probability of experiencing Modified Mercalli Intensity 7 or greater shaking during the planned building entry. We also develop a relation between aftershock probability and the probability of strong shaking, so that users can reference the U.S. Geological Survey aftershock forecast during an ongoing aftershock sequence to determine if the risk threshold has been met. We apply our method to active continental regions (for example, the Western United States), stable continental regions (for example, the Central and Eastern United States), and subduction zones (for example, Cascadia or Alaska).

Open-File Report

End-user needs for remote sensing wetlands of the Prairie Pothole Region of North America

The Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) of North America comprises globally important grassland and wetland ecosystems critical for numerous populations of migratory birds. Due to the importance of this region for migratory birds, and particularly waterfowl, and the threats of habitat loss due to intensifying agriculture, there is a mature and diverse system of conservation organizations, agencies, and partnerships that spends hundreds of millions of dollars annually on habitat conservation to support migratory bird populations. Remote sensing can be a powerful tool for observing and evaluating global change at large scales as well as expanding inferences from field studies to the broader landscape with statistical models. However, development and utilization of these tools has lagged behind their demand for several reasons, including concerns over spatial and temporal resolution and accuracy of products; perception of a misalignment with decision-maker needs; technological barriers such as skill sets of conservation professionals, computing resources, data access, and usability. In this report, we summarize the needs of conservation professionals and scientists who use or want to use remote sensing data products to inform science about wetland change and conservation of wetlands in the PPR. We assembled this information through several methods leading up to, during, and following a January 2026 PPR Wetland Remote Sensing Workshop. The workshop included United States and Canadian scientists, conservation professionals, and policy experts. Our goal was to bring together end-users and remote sensing product developers jointly to explore reducing the lag between product development and utilization of products to inform science and conservation. Specifically, we aimed to identify gaps in wetland remote sensing that limit effective monitoring, management, and conservation in the PPR, and to develop a framework that outlines pathways to address these gaps by fostering collaboration, improving communication networks, encouraging discussion, and building on existing and ongoing efforts. This report summarizes our participants’ descriptions of end-user needs and the outcomes of the workshop.

Prairie Pothole region

Bathymetric survey and storage capacity of Upper Lake Mary near Flagstaff, Arizona in 2024

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the city of Flagstaff, collected bathymetric, light detection and ranging (lidar), and land-survey data of Upper Lake Mary in Arizona during the months of April and October 2024. The city of Flagstaff uses a combination of groundwater from well fields throughout the Flagstaff area and surface water, mainly from Upper Lake Mary, for its potable water supply. The purpose of the survey is to update previous surveys using new technology and compare the results to previous surveys to determine if there was a decrease in storage capacity that could affect the city’s water supply. The lakebed was mapped in April 2024 using a vessel equipped with a multibeam echosounder (MBES) and mobile lidar scanner with positioning captured using a real-time kinematic global navigation satellite system (RTK GNSS) base and receivers. In October 2024, areas of the reservoir that were too shallow for the boat and shoreline that were not captured by the vessel-based lidar were surveyed on foot using hand-held RTK GNSS receivers. At full pool (spillway elevation of 6,831.82 feet above NAVD 88 [2,082.34 meters (m)], Upper Lake Mary has a storage capacity of 16,449.80 acre-feet (20,290,611.73 cubic meters) and a surface area of 953.57 acres (3,860,926.075 square meters). The reservoir is 5.7 miles (9.7 kilometers) long and varies in width from 326 feet (99.36 m) near the central, narrow portion of the reservoir to 2,613 feet (796.44 m) in the upper portion. Comparisons between this survey and the previous two surveys from the 1950s and 2006 indicate no apparent decrease in reservoir area or storage capacity. Results of the 2024 survey indicate that Upper Lake Mary’s storage capacity increased by 0.9 percent from the 2006 survey and a 1.6 percent increase in surface area from the 2006 survey.

Arizona