USGS ScienceSearch

USGS · ofr6018

The Mesaverde group at Sunnyside, Utah

Abstract

The Mesaverde group of Late Cretaceous age at Sunnyside, Utah consists in ascending order; the Blackhawk formation, Castlegate sandstone and the Price River formation. The Mancos shale inter-tongues with the Blackhawk formation. The Mancos shale formed in an offshore marine environment, the Blackhawk formation formed in a mixed marine and continental environment and the Castlegate and Price River formations at Sunnyside, Utah formed in a continental environment. Thin even bedding characterizes the Mancos shale except where it extends as a thin tongue into the Blackhawk formation. Tongues of the Mancos shale in the Blackhawk formation have in places disrupted bedding and locally contain impressions of twigs and branches. Disrupted bedding with mottling, irregular and uneven bedding, and very thick bedding with cross stratification resembling lower foreshore laminae, are primary structures common in modern marine sediments and can also be found in the marine tongues of the Blackhawk formation. Massive, wedge-shaped, cut-and-fill structures characteristic of fluviatile deposits are found in the Castlegate-Price River formations. Particle size distribution in the marine tongues of the Blackhawk formation shows an increasing coarseness as shoreline deposits are approached. Coal particles are generally absent in the marine sandstones of the Blackhawk formation but are commonly found in abundance in the continental sandstones in the Blackhawk. The economic coal beds within the Blackhawk formation at Sunnyside have been reported as consisting of a "Lower" Sunnyside seam and an "Upper" Sunnyside seam. Stratigraphic sections and drill logs indicate that these seams may be splits of one major coal bed and that the term "Upper" Sunnyside seam refers to more than one major split. The relationship of the splits in the Sunnyside coal seams and the lithologic characteristics of the coal indicate that the coal swamp existed on a low-lying coastal plain close to sea level where swamp accumulations were interrupted occasionally by fluviatile deposition. Subsidence due to compaction of underlying sediments, aggradation as the shoreline regressed as well as slow tectonic subsidence or gradual eustatic rise in sea level are factors which may account for the thickness of the Sunnyside coal beds.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 36.997968° to 42.001567° latitude; -114.052962° to -109.041058° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Harold Brodsky. 1960. The Mesaverde group at Sunnyside, Utah. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr6018

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Estimating aftershock risk for entry into earthquake-damaged buildings

We present a simple method to estimate the risk of experiencing strong shaking from aftershocks during entry into earthquake-damaged buildings. We compute wait times until the probability of strong ground shaking from aftershocks reaches a predefined risk threshold; for example, a 0.4 percent probability of experiencing Modified Mercalli Intensity 7 or greater shaking during the planned building entry. We also develop a relation between aftershock probability and the probability of strong shaking, so that users can reference the U.S. Geological Survey aftershock forecast during an ongoing aftershock sequence to determine if the risk threshold has been met. We apply our method to active continental regions (for example, the Western United States), stable continental regions (for example, the Central and Eastern United States), and subduction zones (for example, Cascadia or Alaska).

Open-File Report

End-user needs for remote sensing wetlands of the Prairie Pothole Region of North America

The Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) of North America comprises globally important grassland and wetland ecosystems critical for numerous populations of migratory birds. Due to the importance of this region for migratory birds, and particularly waterfowl, and the threats of habitat loss due to intensifying agriculture, there is a mature and diverse system of conservation organizations, agencies, and partnerships that spends hundreds of millions of dollars annually on habitat conservation to support migratory bird populations. Remote sensing can be a powerful tool for observing and evaluating global change at large scales as well as expanding inferences from field studies to the broader landscape with statistical models. However, development and utilization of these tools has lagged behind their demand for several reasons, including concerns over spatial and temporal resolution and accuracy of products; perception of a misalignment with decision-maker needs; technological barriers such as skill sets of conservation professionals, computing resources, data access, and usability. In this report, we summarize the needs of conservation professionals and scientists who use or want to use remote sensing data products to inform science about wetland change and conservation of wetlands in the PPR. We assembled this information through several methods leading up to, during, and following a January 2026 PPR Wetland Remote Sensing Workshop. The workshop included United States and Canadian scientists, conservation professionals, and policy experts. Our goal was to bring together end-users and remote sensing product developers jointly to explore reducing the lag between product development and utilization of products to inform science and conservation. Specifically, we aimed to identify gaps in wetland remote sensing that limit effective monitoring, management, and conservation in the PPR, and to develop a framework that outlines pathways to address these gaps by fostering collaboration, improving communication networks, encouraging discussion, and building on existing and ongoing efforts. This report summarizes our participants’ descriptions of end-user needs and the outcomes of the workshop.

Prairie Pothole region

Bathymetric survey and storage capacity of Upper Lake Mary near Flagstaff, Arizona in 2024

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the city of Flagstaff, collected bathymetric, light detection and ranging (lidar), and land-survey data of Upper Lake Mary in Arizona during the months of April and October 2024. The city of Flagstaff uses a combination of groundwater from well fields throughout the Flagstaff area and surface water, mainly from Upper Lake Mary, for its potable water supply. The purpose of the survey is to update previous surveys using new technology and compare the results to previous surveys to determine if there was a decrease in storage capacity that could affect the city’s water supply. The lakebed was mapped in April 2024 using a vessel equipped with a multibeam echosounder (MBES) and mobile lidar scanner with positioning captured using a real-time kinematic global navigation satellite system (RTK GNSS) base and receivers. In October 2024, areas of the reservoir that were too shallow for the boat and shoreline that were not captured by the vessel-based lidar were surveyed on foot using hand-held RTK GNSS receivers. At full pool (spillway elevation of 6,831.82 feet above NAVD 88 [2,082.34 meters (m)], Upper Lake Mary has a storage capacity of 16,449.80 acre-feet (20,290,611.73 cubic meters) and a surface area of 953.57 acres (3,860,926.075 square meters). The reservoir is 5.7 miles (9.7 kilometers) long and varies in width from 326 feet (99.36 m) near the central, narrow portion of the reservoir to 2,613 feet (796.44 m) in the upper portion. Comparisons between this survey and the previous two surveys from the 1950s and 2006 indicate no apparent decrease in reservoir area or storage capacity. Results of the 2024 survey indicate that Upper Lake Mary’s storage capacity increased by 0.9 percent from the 2006 survey and a 1.6 percent increase in surface area from the 2006 survey.

Arizona