USGS ScienceSearch

USGS · ofr5992

Geology of the upper Killik-Itkillik region, Alaska

Abstract

The upper Killik-Itkillik map area is a 2,500 square mile segment of foothills along the north front of the Brooks Range on the Arctic Slope of Alaska. The rocks exposed in this area include eleven formations of sedimentary rocks, three types of surficial deposits, and one igneous rock unit. The oldest rocks are a 2,500-foot sequence of limestone which belongs to the Lisburne group (Mississippian). The Lisburne is succeeded by the Siksikpuk formation (Permian ?), a 300-foot unit of variegated shale and siltstone. The Shublik formation (Triassic), composed of 200 to 750 feet of fossiliferous dark shale, limestone, and chart, rests upon the Siksikpuk. Next above the Shublik is a sequence, more than 13,000 feet thick, of marine shale and graywacke which is subdivided into four formations: Tiglukpuk (Late Jurassic), Okpikruak (earliest Cretaceous), Fortress Mountain (late Early Cretaceous), and Torok (late Early Cretaceous). The youngest rocks comprise the Nanushuk group (late Early to Late Cretaceous) which consists of 5,000 feet of interfingering marine and non-marine clastic rocks and is subdivided into three formations: Tuktu, Chandler, and Ninuluk. Small diabase sills, thought to be of latest Jurassic age, intrude the Tiglukpuk and older formations in the western part of the map area. The rocks of the map area have been deformed by north-south tectonic forces in such a way that the upper part of the crust appears to have moved northward relative to deeper parts. Five east-trending zones of distinctive lithology and structure are recognizable: zone I, at the mountain front-massive strata of the Lisburne group sliced by southward dipping imbricate faults and locally thrust upon the younger strata of the dipping imbricate faults and locally thrust upon the younger strata of the foothills, zone II—relatively incompetent interfolded late Paleozoic and Mesozoic strata characterized by isoclinal folds and by small, closely spaced high-angle faults, zone III--chiefly rocks of the Fortress Mountain formation which, although folded and faulted, are not as complexly deformed as the rocks of zone II, zone IV - highly crenulated shale of the Torok formation, and zone V, at the northern edge of the map area--gently folded strata of the Nanushuk group. A seismograph survey across zone IV suggests that, although the incompetent Torok formation is highly crenulated, the subsurface strata lie nearly flat. The character of the subsurface structure in zones II and III is uncertain. However, it is believed that some of the high-angle faults in these two zones may flatten in the subsurface and merge into large sole faults beneath thrust plates of Paleozoic limestone. Such a fault pattern has been found in the foothills of the Alberta Rockies, where the surface structure, stratigraphy and geologic history are remarkably similar. The depositional history of the Paleozoic and Mesozoic strata is divided into a shelf phase during late Paleozoic and Triassic and a geosynclinal phase during Late Jurassic and Cretaceous. The shelf sediments were chiefly marine carbonates and fine clastics, apparently derived largely from the north. The geosynclinal sediments consisted of marine graywacke "flysch" deposits overlain by littoral marine and non-marine coal-bearing "molasse" deposits and were derived mainly from the south. Several periods of emergence and erosion interrupted the shelf and geosynclinal deposition; evidently some folding and faulting occurred during deposition of the "flysch". The principal deformation is believed to have coincided with the Laramide orogeny in Late Cretaceous or Tertiary. In the Pleistocene the Brooks Range was intensively glaciated, and at times of maximum advance, ice tongues along the major river valleys pushed northward into the foothills.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 68.4471389789683° to 68.92663015939613° latitude; -156.37892214834352° to -151.14278652903738° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

William Wallace Patton. 1959. Geology of the upper Killik-Itkillik region, Alaska. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr5992

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Estimating aftershock risk for entry into earthquake-damaged buildings

We present a simple method to estimate the risk of experiencing strong shaking from aftershocks during entry into earthquake-damaged buildings. We compute wait times until the probability of strong ground shaking from aftershocks reaches a predefined risk threshold; for example, a 0.4 percent probability of experiencing Modified Mercalli Intensity 7 or greater shaking during the planned building entry. We also develop a relation between aftershock probability and the probability of strong shaking, so that users can reference the U.S. Geological Survey aftershock forecast during an ongoing aftershock sequence to determine if the risk threshold has been met. We apply our method to active continental regions (for example, the Western United States), stable continental regions (for example, the Central and Eastern United States), and subduction zones (for example, Cascadia or Alaska).

Open-File Report

End-user needs for remote sensing wetlands of the Prairie Pothole Region of North America

The Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) of North America comprises globally important grassland and wetland ecosystems critical for numerous populations of migratory birds. Due to the importance of this region for migratory birds, and particularly waterfowl, and the threats of habitat loss due to intensifying agriculture, there is a mature and diverse system of conservation organizations, agencies, and partnerships that spends hundreds of millions of dollars annually on habitat conservation to support migratory bird populations. Remote sensing can be a powerful tool for observing and evaluating global change at large scales as well as expanding inferences from field studies to the broader landscape with statistical models. However, development and utilization of these tools has lagged behind their demand for several reasons, including concerns over spatial and temporal resolution and accuracy of products; perception of a misalignment with decision-maker needs; technological barriers such as skill sets of conservation professionals, computing resources, data access, and usability. In this report, we summarize the needs of conservation professionals and scientists who use or want to use remote sensing data products to inform science about wetland change and conservation of wetlands in the PPR. We assembled this information through several methods leading up to, during, and following a January 2026 PPR Wetland Remote Sensing Workshop. The workshop included United States and Canadian scientists, conservation professionals, and policy experts. Our goal was to bring together end-users and remote sensing product developers jointly to explore reducing the lag between product development and utilization of products to inform science and conservation. Specifically, we aimed to identify gaps in wetland remote sensing that limit effective monitoring, management, and conservation in the PPR, and to develop a framework that outlines pathways to address these gaps by fostering collaboration, improving communication networks, encouraging discussion, and building on existing and ongoing efforts. This report summarizes our participants’ descriptions of end-user needs and the outcomes of the workshop.

Prairie Pothole region

Bathymetric survey and storage capacity of Upper Lake Mary near Flagstaff, Arizona in 2024

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the city of Flagstaff, collected bathymetric, light detection and ranging (lidar), and land-survey data of Upper Lake Mary in Arizona during the months of April and October 2024. The city of Flagstaff uses a combination of groundwater from well fields throughout the Flagstaff area and surface water, mainly from Upper Lake Mary, for its potable water supply. The purpose of the survey is to update previous surveys using new technology and compare the results to previous surveys to determine if there was a decrease in storage capacity that could affect the city’s water supply. The lakebed was mapped in April 2024 using a vessel equipped with a multibeam echosounder (MBES) and mobile lidar scanner with positioning captured using a real-time kinematic global navigation satellite system (RTK GNSS) base and receivers. In October 2024, areas of the reservoir that were too shallow for the boat and shoreline that were not captured by the vessel-based lidar were surveyed on foot using hand-held RTK GNSS receivers. At full pool (spillway elevation of 6,831.82 feet above NAVD 88 [2,082.34 meters (m)], Upper Lake Mary has a storage capacity of 16,449.80 acre-feet (20,290,611.73 cubic meters) and a surface area of 953.57 acres (3,860,926.075 square meters). The reservoir is 5.7 miles (9.7 kilometers) long and varies in width from 326 feet (99.36 m) near the central, narrow portion of the reservoir to 2,613 feet (796.44 m) in the upper portion. Comparisons between this survey and the previous two surveys from the 1950s and 2006 indicate no apparent decrease in reservoir area or storage capacity. Results of the 2024 survey indicate that Upper Lake Mary’s storage capacity increased by 0.9 percent from the 2006 survey and a 1.6 percent increase in surface area from the 2006 survey.

Arizona