USGS ScienceSearch

USGS · ofr20221101

Bivalve effects on the food web supporting delta smelt—A long-term study of bivalve recruitment, biomass, and grazing rate patterns with varying freshwater outflow

Abstract

Phytoplankton are an important and limiting food source in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta and San Francisco Bay in California. Decreasing phytoplankton biomass is one possible factor for the pelagic organism decline and the decline of the protected Hypomesus transpacificus (delta smelt). Bivalves Corbicula fluminea and Potamocorbula amurensis (hereafter C. fluminea and P. amurensis , respectively) have been shown to control phytoplankton biomass throughout San Francisco Bay and the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta; therefore, their distribution and population dynamics are of great interest. We describe the distribution and dynamics of bivalve biomass using samples from California Department of Water Resources’ (DWR) 2019 benthic monitoring program. As one element of DWR’s and the Bureau of Reclamation’s Environmental Monitoring Program (EMP), the DWR benthic monitoring program examines the effect of water project operations on the estuary as prescribed by a series of Water Rights Decisions mandated by the California State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). The biomass and grazing rate values of both bivalves had similar patterns, therefore, comments on biomass distribution can be applied to grazing rate data. Biomass and recruitment values of C. fluminea were too low at station C9 (Old River upstream from Clift on Court Forebay Intake) to describe a temporal pattern. Corbicula fluminea biomass values were consistently high at station D24 (Sacramento River). Station D4L (confluence of San Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers) biomass values were low during the first half of the year and high the rest of the year. Corbicula fluminea biomass values at station P8 (San Joaquin River) were the highest and most consistent on that river. Station D16 (San Joaquin River) and station D28A (central delta) biomass values were near zero with a small peak in May. Potamocorbula amurensis biomass values were near zero at station D4L (confluence of San Joaquin and Sacramento Rivers). Biomass values were strongly seasonal at station D6 (Suisun Bay). Station D41 (San Pablo Bay) had the highest P. amurensis biomass values. Station D7 (Grizzly Bay) and station D41A (San Pablo Bay) had low biomass values in January-June or July and maximum biomass values in August. Corbicula fluminea recruits in the Sacramento River stations peaked twice, from January to June and from September to December. At the San Joaquin River stations, C. fluminea recruitment peaked from May to July or August and from November to December. Peak recruit abundance was higher on the Sacramento River than the San Joaquin River. Potamocorbula amurensis recruitment was more seasonal than C. fluminea , with a high number of recruits followed by periods with no recruits. Station D4L had few recruits except in January. Station D6 had low recruitment from January to February, increased in August, and peaked from November to December. Station D7 had fewer recruits than station D6 but had a similar temporal pattern, although winter recruits continued into April instead of February. Station D41 recruits were sparce and present only from May to July. Station D41A had the most recruits from January to July, and again in September.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 37.37464201681941° to 38.21596776184356° latitude; -122.87943679633386° to -121.47296304678717° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Emily L. Zierdt Smith, Kelly H. Shrader, Janet K. Thompson, Francis Parchaso, Karen Gehrts, Elizabeth Wells. 2023-04-13. Bivalve effects on the food web supporting delta smelt—A long-term study of bivalve recruitment, biomass, and grazing rate patterns with varying freshwater outflow. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20221101

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Estimating aftershock risk for entry into earthquake-damaged buildings

We present a simple method to estimate the risk of experiencing strong shaking from aftershocks during entry into earthquake-damaged buildings. We compute wait times until the probability of strong ground shaking from aftershocks reaches a predefined risk threshold; for example, a 0.4 percent probability of experiencing Modified Mercalli Intensity 7 or greater shaking during the planned building entry. We also develop a relation between aftershock probability and the probability of strong shaking, so that users can reference the U.S. Geological Survey aftershock forecast during an ongoing aftershock sequence to determine if the risk threshold has been met. We apply our method to active continental regions (for example, the Western United States), stable continental regions (for example, the Central and Eastern United States), and subduction zones (for example, Cascadia or Alaska).

Open-File Report

End-user needs for remote sensing wetlands of the Prairie Pothole Region of North America

The Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) of North America comprises globally important grassland and wetland ecosystems critical for numerous populations of migratory birds. Due to the importance of this region for migratory birds, and particularly waterfowl, and the threats of habitat loss due to intensifying agriculture, there is a mature and diverse system of conservation organizations, agencies, and partnerships that spends hundreds of millions of dollars annually on habitat conservation to support migratory bird populations. Remote sensing can be a powerful tool for observing and evaluating global change at large scales as well as expanding inferences from field studies to the broader landscape with statistical models. However, development and utilization of these tools has lagged behind their demand for several reasons, including concerns over spatial and temporal resolution and accuracy of products; perception of a misalignment with decision-maker needs; technological barriers such as skill sets of conservation professionals, computing resources, data access, and usability. In this report, we summarize the needs of conservation professionals and scientists who use or want to use remote sensing data products to inform science about wetland change and conservation of wetlands in the PPR. We assembled this information through several methods leading up to, during, and following a January 2026 PPR Wetland Remote Sensing Workshop. The workshop included United States and Canadian scientists, conservation professionals, and policy experts. Our goal was to bring together end-users and remote sensing product developers jointly to explore reducing the lag between product development and utilization of products to inform science and conservation. Specifically, we aimed to identify gaps in wetland remote sensing that limit effective monitoring, management, and conservation in the PPR, and to develop a framework that outlines pathways to address these gaps by fostering collaboration, improving communication networks, encouraging discussion, and building on existing and ongoing efforts. This report summarizes our participants’ descriptions of end-user needs and the outcomes of the workshop.

Prairie Pothole region

Bathymetric survey and storage capacity of Upper Lake Mary near Flagstaff, Arizona in 2024

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the city of Flagstaff, collected bathymetric, light detection and ranging (lidar), and land-survey data of Upper Lake Mary in Arizona during the months of April and October 2024. The city of Flagstaff uses a combination of groundwater from well fields throughout the Flagstaff area and surface water, mainly from Upper Lake Mary, for its potable water supply. The purpose of the survey is to update previous surveys using new technology and compare the results to previous surveys to determine if there was a decrease in storage capacity that could affect the city’s water supply. The lakebed was mapped in April 2024 using a vessel equipped with a multibeam echosounder (MBES) and mobile lidar scanner with positioning captured using a real-time kinematic global navigation satellite system (RTK GNSS) base and receivers. In October 2024, areas of the reservoir that were too shallow for the boat and shoreline that were not captured by the vessel-based lidar were surveyed on foot using hand-held RTK GNSS receivers. At full pool (spillway elevation of 6,831.82 feet above NAVD 88 [2,082.34 meters (m)], Upper Lake Mary has a storage capacity of 16,449.80 acre-feet (20,290,611.73 cubic meters) and a surface area of 953.57 acres (3,860,926.075 square meters). The reservoir is 5.7 miles (9.7 kilometers) long and varies in width from 326 feet (99.36 m) near the central, narrow portion of the reservoir to 2,613 feet (796.44 m) in the upper portion. Comparisons between this survey and the previous two surveys from the 1950s and 2006 indicate no apparent decrease in reservoir area or storage capacity. Results of the 2024 survey indicate that Upper Lake Mary’s storage capacity increased by 0.9 percent from the 2006 survey and a 1.6 percent increase in surface area from the 2006 survey.

Arizona