USGS ScienceSearch

USGS · ofr20211078

Quantification of metal loading using tracer dilution and instantaneous synoptic sampling and importance of diel cycling in Leavenworth Creek, Clear Creek County, Colorado, 2012

Abstract

Leavenworth Creek, a tributary of South Clear Creek and Clear Creek near Georgetown, Colorado, contains copper, lead, and zinc at concentrations close to or in excess of aquatic-life standards. In the summer of 2012, the U.S. Geological Survey, in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service and the Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety, conducted monitoring to (1) quantify the effects of diel cycling and perform synoptic sampling in a way to minimize those effects, (2) separate “point” or distinct single tributaries or sources of load from diffuse load sources along the study reach to aid remediation planning, and (3) quantify metal loading from transmountain diversion of water from Peru Creek through the Vidler Tunnel into Leavenworth Creek. The study included monitoring for diel cycles in June 2012 and diel and synoptic sampling in August 2012 along an approximately 2-kilometer stream reach. Synoptic samples were collected at 26 stream and 35 inflow, tributary, mine waste seep, and mine tunnel sites from August 28 to 30, 2012. In June 2012, temperature, dissolved oxygen, and pH showed strong diel signals at two sites in Leavenworth Creek, with temperature and pH having minimum values near dawn and maximum values during the afternoon and dissolved oxygen having maximum values in the early morning and minimum values in late afternoon. Concentrations of zinc, cadmium, cobalt, manganese, and yttrium showed strong diel fluctuations at both sites with minimum concentrations during daytime and maximum concentrations during nighttime. Because of these diel cycles, all stream sites were sampled during synoptic sampling at 1200 hours on August 30, 2012. During synoptic sampling from August 28 to 30, 2012, zinc showed maximum concentrations at nighttime and minimum concentrations at midday and diel variation ranged from 26 to 33 percent. Inflows from the Wilcox Tunnel and Waldorf seep area were the greatest source of zinc load to the stream (about 45 percent), and a left-bank inflow in the dispersed tailings area was the greatest source of lead (about 45 percent) and manganese (about 25 percent) loads to the stream, and a secondary source for zinc (about 40 percent). Copper load was almost equally divided (about 35 percent) between these two sources. Diffuse loading, likely from left-bank sources, was evident for copper, lead, manganese, and zinc in the stream reach from approximately 800 to 1,200 meters, and for copper, lead, and, to a lesser extent, manganese in the reach containing left-bank dispersed tailings (from approximately 1,300 to 1,800 meters). The load values reported herein are minimum estimates because the stream synoptic samples were collected at 1200 hours when positively charged elements, including copper, lead, manganese, and zinc, have minimum concentrations. Diel patterns measured for zinc during the synoptic sampling indicate maximum daily zinc loads were as much as 33 percent greater than those measured at 1200 hours on August 30, 2012. Transmountain diversion of water through Vidler Tunnel negatively affects water quality in Leavenworth Creek as indicated by much greater metal loads and concentrations and a visually evident mixing zone where Vidler Tunnel water joins Leavenworth Creek when diversion is active compared to when it is not.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 39.595371402863655° to 39.71405356154611° latitude; -105.86219787597655° to -105.69602966308594° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Katherine Walton-Day, Robert L. Runkel, Christin D. Smith, Briant A. Kimball. 2021-12-01. Quantification of metal loading using tracer dilution and instantaneous synoptic sampling and importance of diel cycling in Leavenworth Creek, Clear Creek County, Colorado, 2012. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20211078

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Estimating aftershock risk for entry into earthquake-damaged buildings

We present a simple method to estimate the risk of experiencing strong shaking from aftershocks during entry into earthquake-damaged buildings. We compute wait times until the probability of strong ground shaking from aftershocks reaches a predefined risk threshold; for example, a 0.4 percent probability of experiencing Modified Mercalli Intensity 7 or greater shaking during the planned building entry. We also develop a relation between aftershock probability and the probability of strong shaking, so that users can reference the U.S. Geological Survey aftershock forecast during an ongoing aftershock sequence to determine if the risk threshold has been met. We apply our method to active continental regions (for example, the Western United States), stable continental regions (for example, the Central and Eastern United States), and subduction zones (for example, Cascadia or Alaska).

Open-File Report

End-user needs for remote sensing wetlands of the Prairie Pothole Region of North America

The Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) of North America comprises globally important grassland and wetland ecosystems critical for numerous populations of migratory birds. Due to the importance of this region for migratory birds, and particularly waterfowl, and the threats of habitat loss due to intensifying agriculture, there is a mature and diverse system of conservation organizations, agencies, and partnerships that spends hundreds of millions of dollars annually on habitat conservation to support migratory bird populations. Remote sensing can be a powerful tool for observing and evaluating global change at large scales as well as expanding inferences from field studies to the broader landscape with statistical models. However, development and utilization of these tools has lagged behind their demand for several reasons, including concerns over spatial and temporal resolution and accuracy of products; perception of a misalignment with decision-maker needs; technological barriers such as skill sets of conservation professionals, computing resources, data access, and usability. In this report, we summarize the needs of conservation professionals and scientists who use or want to use remote sensing data products to inform science about wetland change and conservation of wetlands in the PPR. We assembled this information through several methods leading up to, during, and following a January 2026 PPR Wetland Remote Sensing Workshop. The workshop included United States and Canadian scientists, conservation professionals, and policy experts. Our goal was to bring together end-users and remote sensing product developers jointly to explore reducing the lag between product development and utilization of products to inform science and conservation. Specifically, we aimed to identify gaps in wetland remote sensing that limit effective monitoring, management, and conservation in the PPR, and to develop a framework that outlines pathways to address these gaps by fostering collaboration, improving communication networks, encouraging discussion, and building on existing and ongoing efforts. This report summarizes our participants’ descriptions of end-user needs and the outcomes of the workshop.

Prairie Pothole region

Bathymetric survey and storage capacity of Upper Lake Mary near Flagstaff, Arizona in 2024

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the city of Flagstaff, collected bathymetric, light detection and ranging (lidar), and land-survey data of Upper Lake Mary in Arizona during the months of April and October 2024. The city of Flagstaff uses a combination of groundwater from well fields throughout the Flagstaff area and surface water, mainly from Upper Lake Mary, for its potable water supply. The purpose of the survey is to update previous surveys using new technology and compare the results to previous surveys to determine if there was a decrease in storage capacity that could affect the city’s water supply. The lakebed was mapped in April 2024 using a vessel equipped with a multibeam echosounder (MBES) and mobile lidar scanner with positioning captured using a real-time kinematic global navigation satellite system (RTK GNSS) base and receivers. In October 2024, areas of the reservoir that were too shallow for the boat and shoreline that were not captured by the vessel-based lidar were surveyed on foot using hand-held RTK GNSS receivers. At full pool (spillway elevation of 6,831.82 feet above NAVD 88 [2,082.34 meters (m)], Upper Lake Mary has a storage capacity of 16,449.80 acre-feet (20,290,611.73 cubic meters) and a surface area of 953.57 acres (3,860,926.075 square meters). The reservoir is 5.7 miles (9.7 kilometers) long and varies in width from 326 feet (99.36 m) near the central, narrow portion of the reservoir to 2,613 feet (796.44 m) in the upper portion. Comparisons between this survey and the previous two surveys from the 1950s and 2006 indicate no apparent decrease in reservoir area or storage capacity. Results of the 2024 survey indicate that Upper Lake Mary’s storage capacity increased by 0.9 percent from the 2006 survey and a 1.6 percent increase in surface area from the 2006 survey.

Arizona