USGS Science⌕ Search

USGS · 70283251

Establishing realistic length standards for Cutthroat Trout, Rainbow Trout, and Mountain Whitefish

Abstract

Objective Proportional size distribution (PSD) is a simple index used to summarize length data that is easily communicated, provides insight on fish population dynamics (e.g., growth, recruitment), and is often used to establish management objectives. However, the current length categories for Cutthroat Trout Oncorhynchus clarkii and Rainbow Trout O. mykiss were based on the all-tackle world records (an atypically large adfluvial Cutthroat Trout and a steelhead [anadromous Rainbow Trout]). Consequently, the length categories (stock [S], quality [Q], preferred [P], memorable [M], trophy [T]) are so large for these two species that the index is of limited use for most populations throughout western North America, particularly for large length-groups. In addition, length standards have not been proposed for Mountain Whitefish Prosopium williamsoni . As such, we sought to provide new length standards for Cutthroat Trout, Rainbow Trout, and Mountain Whitefish that allow fisheries scientists to calculate useful PSD values. Methods We compiled data from nearly 3 million fish across the western United States. A percentile-based approach was used to identify the individual total length that would form the basis of estimating length standards. We placed each fish into its respective 10-digit hydrological unit code, obtained the maximum length (all lengths are total length) for each 10-digit hydrological unit code by species, and then identified the 99th percentile of the maximum lengths. The species-specific 99th percentile value was then used to estimate potential length standards for each length category. For Mountain Whitefish, we used the current world-record length as the basis for generating length standards. We compared PSDs calculated using existing and revised length standards to provide insight on potential issues with the proposed values. Results We propose the following minimum total lengths for PSD calculations: 18 cm (7 inches; S), 28 cm (11 inches; Q), 35 cm (14 inches; P), 43 cm (17 inches; M), and 53 cm (21 inches; T) for Cutthroat Trout; 20 cm (8 inches; S), 30 cm (12 inches; Q), 40 cm (16 inches; P), 50 cm (20 inches; M), and 60 cm (24 inches; T) for Rainbow Trout; and 15 cm (6 inches; S), 25 cm (10 inches; Q), 30 cm (12 inches; P), 38 cm (15 inches; M), and 48 cm (19 inches; T) for Mountain Whitefish. Revised values provided more realistic estimates of PSD for Cutthroat Trout and Rainbow Trout than existing values. The proposed length standards for Mountain Whitefish resulted in PSD values that were realistic and useful for characterizing length structure. Conclusions The length standards presented here provide fisheries scientists with tools to aid in the study and management of Cutthroat Trout, Rainbow Trout, and Mountain Whitefish populations.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 35.0914238° to 48.972349° latitude; -125.07566830411835° to -102.0414004° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Michael C. Quist, Nicholas S. Voss, Jeffrey R. Glaid, Kevin A. Meyer. 2026-08-21. Establishing realistic length standards for Cutthroat Trout, Rainbow Trout, and Mountain Whitefish. https://doi.org/10.1093/najfmt%2Fvqag053

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Environmental relationships with Silver Carp population ecology across the Mississippi River basin

Objective Silver Carp Hypophthalmichthys molitrix are of special concern to fisheries management agencies across the Mississippi River basin, but effective control of the species is challenging. Our objectives were to (1) identify spatial and environmental patterns among key Silver Carp demographic rates that could be exploited by removal programs and (2) develop predictive models of Silver Carp demographic rates using readily available environmental data that could potentially be used to quantify population ecology without expending the resources to conduct population assessments. Methods We collected Silver Carp from six rivers within the lower Mississippi River subbasin (i.e., Arkansas, Cache, Mississippi, St. Francis, White, and Yazoo rivers) and compiled raw data from populations in the upper Mississippi, Missouri, and Ohio River subbasins to estimate demographic rates (i.e., growth, mortality, and recruitment variability). We compared the demographic rates among subbasins and between main stems and tributaries using standard nonparametric tests. We used information-theoretic model selection to evaluate relationships among demographic rates, environmental conditions, and invasion stage. Results In general, lower Mississippi River subbasin populations exhibited faster growth and lower mortality than did those from the upper Mississippi River subbasin. Populations in main-stem rivers did not differ from those in tributaries. More established populations in warmer, free-flowing rivers (e.g., White River) generally experienced faster growth, lower mortality, and more stable recruitment than less established populations in cooler, impounded rivers (e.g., Illinois River). Conclusions The results indicated that variability in Silver Carp populations was related to environmental conditions and invasion stage. Our results suggested that the effectiveness of removal programs might be ­improved by targeting populations in warm hydrologically variable rivers, as they may have increased reproduction capacities and emigration rates. The equations provided here may be used to estimate population ­demographics for Silver Carp and help determine their potential sensitivity to management actions, without expending the resources that are required to collect population-specific biological data.

Mississippi River basin↗

Arctic Grayling, scared to death: Are Brown Trout an impediment to Arctic Grayling reintroduction success in Michigan?

Introduction: Arctic Grayling Thymallus arcticus were extirpated from Michigan in 1936. Their demise was caused by over-fishing, habitat destruction from large-scale logging, and Brook Trout Salvelinus fontinalis and Brown Trout Salmo trutta. Subsequently, Brook and Brown trout have become the dominant salmonid species in Michigan streams. Past attempts to restore Grayling to Michigan have been unsuccessful perhaps due to competition with these now resident salmonids. Objective: To determine the impacts of competition between age-0 Arctic Grayling and age-0 Brook and Brown Trout on Grayling growth and survival. Methods: Competition trials were performed in experimental streams, lasting two months, across three years, with three treatment types: the control, 10 Grayling with 10 Grayling; the Brook Trout treatment, 10 Grayling with 10 Brook Trout; and the Brown Trout treatment, 10 Grayling with 10 Brown Trout. Results: Brown Trout had a significant effect on Arctic Grayling growth and mortality, while Brook Trout had no effect on Arctic Grayling growth or mortality. Conclusion: Age-0 Brown Trout negatively impacted growth, condition, and survival of age-0 Arctic Grayling, while the impacts of age-0 Brook Trout or conspecifics were negligible. This suggests reintroduction of Arctic Grayling may be more successful in streams with few or no Brown Trout.

Michigan↗

Describing Yellow Perch population characteristics in Wisconsin to better understand observed declines in size structure

Objective Recent studies suggest that Yellow Perch Perca flavescens size structure has declined in Wisconsin and Minnesota. Little is known about most of the Yellow Perch populations that exist across the upper Midwestern USA because Yellow Perch are not a focus of standardized sampling and age estimation rarely occurs. To better understand Yellow Perch population dynamics and demographics, we described age- and length-based characteristics of 31 Yellow Perch populations in Wisconsin and assessed potential correlations with abiotic and biotic variables. Methods During 2018–2019, Yellow Perch were collected from 31 populations during spring fyke-net surveys to calculate mean total length (TL) at age 4 (ML4), maximum age, proportional size distribution (PSD), and mean TL of the five largest fish (MXL5). Pearson correlations were used to identify associations among these metrics and with a suite of abiotic and biotic variables. Results Mean TL at age 4 was <175 mm for 54% of our study populations, median maximum age was 8 years, median PSD was 15, and median MXL5 was 229 mm TL. There were positive correlations among ML4, PSD, and MXL5 and between maximum age and MXL5. Yellow Perch metrics were not correlated with catch per effort of Walleye Sander vitreus , Largemouth Bass Micropterus nigricans , or Bluegill Lepomis macrochirus . Yellow Perch population metrics were generally not correlated to environmental variables except for ML4, which was positively correlated to shoreline development index and maximum age, which was negatively correlated to growing degree-days and lake surface area. Conclusions Many Wisconsin Yellow Perch populations we evaluated were slow growing with low size structure and limited capacity to produce fish ≥200 mm TL. Populations where PSD is ≥32 and MXL5 ≥245 mm TL may represent exceptional opportunities for anglers to catch relatively large fish and could warrant additional investigation to identify factors contributing to high size structure.

Wisconsin↗