Future proofing black bass management: Modernizing the fisheries manager’s toolbox

James M. Long

doi:10.1093/najfmt/vqag037

Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70283237

Future proofing black bass management: Modernizing the fisheries manager’s toolbox

James M. Long

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Objectives A number of key factors are important to bass fisheries management. To adapt to a changing socioeconomic landscape and fish practices, bass fisheries managers can learn from past and current actions in an effort to incorporate new tools that are suitable for management in a changing landscape. Methods From existing generalized life cycles of fisheries coupled with the hierarchy of needs model of human development, I developed a life cycle of bass fisheries, which incorporates major trends in bass science, management, and utility over time. By visualizing past trends, one can visualize potential futures from which managers can proactively plan for management. Results The bass fisheries life cycle illustrates the change in perspective over time relative to bass utility in concert with the change in society from colonization to industrialization and modernization. Throughout this life cycle, science has had an interest in defining black bass species, with resolution affecting management. Over time, commercial interests in black bass as a food source predominated, followed by recreational interests. However, at the current stage, black bass fisheries appear to be dominated by two potentially conflicting interests: eradication–control of invasive bass populations and trophy-seeking. Using this model, I identified toolsets for black bass managers to incorporate into their toolboxes for the future. Conclusions The black bass life cycle suggests an increased emphasis in the future on managing for native populations in their natural habitat simultaneously with trophy fish management. In both cases, genetics tools will be necessary to aid their management. New population and habitat assessment tools will also likely be required beyond what has been currently typical. Additionally, human dimensions and conflict resolution skills will further enable black bass managers to work more efficiently in an increasingly dynamic landscape.

Explore related subjects

North American Journal of Fisheries Management Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

James M. Long. 2026-08-31. Future proofing black bass management: Modernizing the fisheries manager’s toolbox. https://doi.org/10.1093/najfmt%2Fvqag037

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Environmental relationships with Silver Carp population ecology across the Mississippi River basin

Objective Silver Carp Hypophthalmichthys molitrix are of special concern to fisheries management agencies across the Mississippi River basin, but effective control of the species is challenging. Our objectives were to (1) identify spatial and environmental patterns among key Silver Carp demographic rates that could be exploited by removal programs and (2) develop predictive models of Silver Carp demographic rates using readily available environmental data that could potentially be used to quantify population ecology without expending the resources to conduct population assessments. Methods We collected Silver Carp from six rivers within the lower Mississippi River subbasin (i.e., Arkansas, Cache, Mississippi, St. Francis, White, and Yazoo rivers) and compiled raw data from populations in the upper Mississippi, Missouri, and Ohio River subbasins to estimate demographic rates (i.e., growth, mortality, and recruitment variability). We compared the demographic rates among subbasins and between main stems and tributaries using standard nonparametric tests. We used information-theoretic model selection to evaluate relationships among demographic rates, environmental conditions, and invasion stage. Results In general, lower Mississippi River subbasin populations exhibited faster growth and lower mortality than did those from the upper Mississippi River subbasin. Populations in main-stem rivers did not differ from those in tributaries. More established populations in warmer, free-flowing rivers (e.g., White River) generally experienced faster growth, lower mortality, and more stable recruitment than less established populations in cooler, impounded rivers (e.g., Illinois River). Conclusions The results indicated that variability in Silver Carp populations was related to environmental conditions and invasion stage. Our results suggested that the effectiveness of removal programs might be improved by targeting populations in warm hydrologically variable rivers, as they may have increased reproduction capacities and emigration rates. The equations provided here may be used to estimate population demographics for Silver Carp and help determine their potential sensitivity to management actions, without expending the resources that are required to collect population-specific biological data.

Mississippi River basin↗

USGS2026

Arctic Grayling, scared to death: Are Brown Trout an impediment to Arctic Grayling reintroduction success in Michigan?

Introduction: Arctic Grayling Thymallus arcticus were extirpated from Michigan in 1936. Their demise was caused by over-fishing, habitat destruction from large-scale logging, and Brook Trout Salvelinus fontinalis and Brown Trout Salmo trutta. Subsequently, Brook and Brown trout have become the dominant salmonid species in Michigan streams. Past attempts to restore Grayling to Michigan have been unsuccessful perhaps due to competition with these now resident salmonids. Objective: To determine the impacts of competition between age-0 Arctic Grayling and age-0 Brook and Brown Trout on Grayling growth and survival. Methods: Competition trials were performed in experimental streams, lasting two months, across three years, with three treatment types: the control, 10 Grayling with 10 Grayling; the Brook Trout treatment, 10 Grayling with 10 Brook Trout; and the Brown Trout treatment, 10 Grayling with 10 Brown Trout. Results: Brown Trout had a significant effect on Arctic Grayling growth and mortality, while Brook Trout had no effect on Arctic Grayling growth or mortality. Conclusion: Age-0 Brown Trout negatively impacted growth, condition, and survival of age-0 Arctic Grayling, while the impacts of age-0 Brook Trout or conspecifics were negligible. This suggests reintroduction of Arctic Grayling may be more successful in streams with few or no Brown Trout.

Michigan↗

USGS2026

Describing Yellow Perch population characteristics in Wisconsin to better understand observed declines in size structure

Objective Recent studies suggest that Yellow Perch Perca flavescens size structure has declined in Wisconsin and Minnesota. Little is known about most of the Yellow Perch populations that exist across the upper Midwestern USA because Yellow Perch are not a focus of standardized sampling and age estimation rarely occurs. To better understand Yellow Perch population dynamics and demographics, we described age- and length-based characteristics of 31 Yellow Perch populations in Wisconsin and assessed potential correlations with abiotic and biotic variables. Methods During 2018–2019, Yellow Perch were collected from 31 populations during spring fyke-net surveys to calculate mean total length (TL) at age 4 (ML4), maximum age, proportional size distribution (PSD), and mean TL of the five largest fish (MXL5). Pearson correlations were used to identify associations among these metrics and with a suite of abiotic and biotic variables. Results Mean TL at age 4 was <175 mm for 54% of our study populations, median maximum age was 8 years, median PSD was 15, and median MXL5 was 229 mm TL. There were positive correlations among ML4, PSD, and MXL5 and between maximum age and MXL5. Yellow Perch metrics were not correlated with catch per effort of Walleye Sander vitreus , Largemouth Bass Micropterus nigricans , or Bluegill Lepomis macrochirus . Yellow Perch population metrics were generally not correlated to environmental variables except for ML4, which was positively correlated to shoreline development index and maximum age, which was negatively correlated to growing degree-days and lake surface area. Conclusions Many Wisconsin Yellow Perch populations we evaluated were slow growing with low size structure and limited capacity to produce fish ≥200 mm TL. Populations where PSD is ≥32 and MXL5 ≥245 mm TL may represent exceptional opportunities for anglers to catch relatively large fish and could warrant additional investigation to identify factors contributing to high size structure.

Wisconsin↗