USGS Science⌕ Search

USGS · 70283200

The application of state-and-transition models to remotely sensed fractional cover datasets

Abstract

Assessing vegetation conditions in expansive rangeland ecosystems has long posed a persistent challenge. Recent advancements in remote sensing technologies have provided new avenues for improving this assessment process. In this study, conducted at two ranch sites in Nevada, we integrated existing line-point-intercept monitoring data with additional field observations to evaluate the vegetation condition or “State” at various monitoring points. We then employed machine learning techniques to classify gridded raster datasets, aligning them with existing state-and-transition models (STMs) specific to each study area. Leveraging Landsat-derived fractional cover datasets, along with climate and soil predictors, we aimed to predict vegetation State within specific Vegetation Great Groups (VGGs). The resulting vegetation State maps were then combined to generate a cohesive representation of vegetation conditions across the study sites. Our analysis revealed that relative functional group cover emerged as a superior predictor of vegetation state and ecological processes at the site level. However, we encountered variations in state mapping accuracy ranging from approximately 14% to 44% error. These discrepancies were influenced by factors such as study location, landscape heterogeneity, availability of training data, and species-specific challenges, all of which complicate the accurate classification of remote sensing datasets.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 38.587668671492025° to 42.14395336799484° latitude; -119.97542570165604° to -113.95304630454267° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lucas Phipps, Tamzen K. Stringham, Wade Lieurance, Matthew B. Rigge. 2026. The application of state-and-transition models to remotely sensed fractional cover datasets. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6884128

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Design, construction and application of an automated thermal chamber to determine critical thermal maxima in small anurans

Critical thermal maximum (CTMax) is a thermal threshold useful for understanding physiological boundaries and predicting anuran vulnerability to climate warming. Given the value of this metric, a comprehensive review of the literature on CTMax protocols (1962-2025) revealed widespread methodological inconsistencies and rare verification of ramping rate accuracy, essential to gauge the reliability of estimates and facilitate comparisons among studies. We engineered an inexpensive (<300 USD) automated CTMax chamber incorporating dual thermocouples, a programmable proportional integral derivative (PID) controller, and real-time software monitoring to address these deficiencies. Performance validation across eight trials demonstrated alignment between programmed and observed temperature ramping rate (0.40 vs. 0.39 °C/min; Z = 1.58, P > 0.05). As a proof-of-concept, we used the proposed system to generate CTMax estimates of six species of Eleutherodactylus in Puerto Rico, including first reports for E. brittoni, E. cochranae, E. wightmanae, and E. juanariveroi. CTMax values ranged from 36.30°C ± 0.52 (E. wightmanae) to 42.10°C ± 0.66 (E. cochranae), with warming tolerances ranging from 15.00°C ± 0.63 to 18.18°C ± 0.73. Our design provides an accurate, replicable, and ethical approach for CTMax measurement and enhances the capacity to assess small amphibian vulnerability to global warming.

SSRN↗

Estimating the probability of export restrictions to inform mineral criticality

As demand for advanced technologies rises, mineral commodities will increase in geopolitical importance. To assess risks associated with mineral commodity supply chain disruptions, governmental agencies and others have developed "criticality" assessments, with criticality described using the economic impact and probability of supply chain disruptions. In previous work, subjective supply risk indicators were developed to approximate this probability, typically combining several factors such as supply diversity and political stability of trading partners, where indicator weightings can substantially impact results. This work explicitly quantifies trade barrier probability using an ensemble of several machine learning classifiers, with probability estimates informed by exogenous variables such as prior trade barrier implementation and global export dominance. Major differences in the high-probability countries and commodities are observed across models, but the ensemble method highlights Indonesia, China, Tanzania, and the United States as particularly high risk. This approach enables a direct, quantitative, objective approach to assessing trade barrier probability, enhancing risk identification and prioritization for policymakers.

SSRN↗