USGS Science⌕ Search

USGS · 70283123

Multivariate spatio-temporal clustering of wind–wave variability across European seas

Abstract

This study presents a multivariate spatio-temporal clustering framework to characterise joint wind–wave regimes across European seas using the fifth-generation atmospheric reanalysis produced by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ERA5; 1979–2014). Seasonal and annual statistics of significant wave height, mean wave period, wind speed, and wave/wind direction were computed at 0.5° resolution. Principal component analysis was used to reduce dimensionality, retaining 30 components that captured 99% of the variance. K-means clustering was then used to identify nine coherent dynamical regimes with persistent spatio-temporal signatures. These regimes were grouped into open-ocean, transitional, and enclosed/semi-enclosed categories based on internal variability, directional spread, and geographic exposure. Open-Atlantic regimes are found to be energy-rich, exhibiting clear December–February maxima in significant wave height ( 𝐻 𝑠 ), mean wave period ( 𝑇 02 ), and 10 m wind speed ( 𝑊 𝑠 10 ); enclosed and semi-enclosed basins show lower amplitudes and reduced variability, while transitional shelves and the southern Mediterranean display intermediate conditions, characterised by moderate 𝑇 02 levels and seasonal rotation of wave and wind directions, reflecting a mixed influence of locally generated seas and remotely forced swell. Dispersion analysis highlights a clear Atlantic–Mediterranean partition, with transitional shelves forming a dynamical bridge between open-ocean and enclosed basins. Teleconnection analysis shows that the North Atlantic Oscillation and Arctic Oscillation dominate Atlantic regimes, while the Scandinavia, East Atlantic, and Polar/Eurasia patterns modulate variability and directional persistence in transitional and enclosed seas. The classification defines a climatological framework of European wind–wave conditions and establishes a practical basis for renewable energy assessment, engineering design, and long-term change analysis, with methods transferable to other basins.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 25° to 70.96091210594687° latitude; -20° to 45° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ponni Maya, José A. Antolínez, Kai Alexander Parker, Laura Cagigal, Andrei Metrikine. 2026-08-11. Multivariate spatio-temporal clustering of wind–wave variability across European seas. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17080776

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Atmospheric circulation drivers of extreme high water level events at Foggy Island Bay, Alaska

The northern coast of Alaska is experiencing significant climatic change enhancing hazards from reduced sea ice and increased coastal erosion. This same region is home to offshore oil/gas activities. Foggy Island Bay is one region along the Beaufort Sea coast with planned offshore oil/gas development that will need to account for the changing climate. High water levels impact infrastructure through coastal erosion and flooding hazards. In this study, 21 high water level events exceeding the top 95th percentile were identified at the gauge in Prudhoe Bay, Alaska (adjacent to Foggy Island Bay) over 1990-2018. All events were associated with strong westerly winds according to weather station records. Low pressure storm systems were found to be a key driver of westerly winds in the region according to downscaled reanalysis and storm track data. A dynamically downscaled global climate model projection from CMIP5 indicates that days with westerly wind events will become frequent by 2100 in the Foggy Island Bay region. Coupled with the anticipated continued decline in sea ice, the northern coast of Alaska may experience more frequent high water events over the next ~80 years.

Alaska↗

Mortality associated with extreme heat in Washington State: The historical and projected public health burden

Extreme heat is one of the most important pathways illustrating the connection between climate and human health, and climate change is expected to exacerbate this public health issue. This study first used a case-crossover analysis to characterize the historical (1980–2018) association between summertime heat and non-traumatic mortality in Washington State. A separate analysis was conducted for each of the state’s ten climate divisions to produce distinct exposure–response curves expressing odds of mortality as a function of humidex. Stratified analyses were used to assess the impact of age, sex, race/ethnicity, and select causes of death, and the reported results are pooled across all divisions using meta-analysis. The historical heat–mortality relationship was combined with climate projections to estimate the impact of climate change on heat-related deaths in 2030, 2050, and 2080 under two warming scenarios. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals of mortality at the 99th percentile of humidex compared to the 50th percentile did not include the null value in four climate divisions (E Olympic Cascade Foothills, NE Olympic San Juan, Northeastern, and Puget Sound Lowlands). The statewide odds of mortality are 8% higher (6%, 10%) on 99th percentile days compared to 50th percentile days, driven primarily by an OR of 1.09 (1.06, 1.11) in the Puget Sound Lowlands. Risk is higher for women than men and for Blacks than Whites. Risk increases with age and for diabetic, circulatory, cardiovascular, ischemic, cerebrovascular, and respiratory deaths. The 95% confidence intervals of projected heat-attributable mortality did not overlap with zero in three climate divisions (E Olympic Cascade Foothills, NE Olympic San Juan, and Puget Sound Lowlands). In these three divisions, the average percent increase in heat-attributable mortality across both warming scenarios is 35%, 35%, and 603% in 2030, 2050, and 2080, respectively. This research is the most extensive study of heat-related mortality in Washington to date and can help inform public health initiatives aiming to improve present and future health outcomes in the state.

Washington↗

Comparing simulations of umbrella-cloud growth and ash transport with observations from Pinatubo, Kelud, and Calbuco volcanoes

The largest explosive volcanic eruptions produce umbrella clouds that drive ash radially outward, enlarging the area that impacts aviation and ground-based communities. Models must consider the effects of umbrella spreading when forecasting hazards from these eruptions. In this paper we test a version of the advection–dispersion model Ash3d that considers umbrella spreading by comparing its simulations with observations from three well-documented umbrella-forming eruptions: (1) the 15 June 1991 eruption of Pinatubo (Philippines); (2) the 13 February 2014 eruption of Kelud (Indonesia); and (3) phase 2 of the 22–23 April 2015 eruption of Calbuco (Chile). In volume, these eruptions ranged from several cubic kilometers dense-rock equivalent (DRE) for Pinatubo to about one tenth for Calbuco. In mass eruption rate (MER), they ranged from 10 8 –10 9 kg s −1 at Pinatubo to 9–16 × 10 6 kg s −1 at Calbuco. For each case we ran simulations that considered umbrella growth and ones that did not. All umbrella-cloud simulations produced a cloud whose area was within ~25% of the observed cloud by the end of the eruption. By the eruption end, the simulated areas of the Pinatubo, Kelud, and Calbuco clouds were 851, 53.2, and 100 × 10 3 km 2 respectively. These areas were 2.2, 2.2, and 1.5 times the areas calculated in simulations that ignored umbrella growth. For Pinatubo and Kelud, the umbrella simulations provided better agreement with the observed cloud area than the non-umbrella simulations. Each of these simulations extended 24 h from the eruption start. After the eruption ended, the difference in cloud area (umbrella minus non-umbrella) at Pinatubo persisted for many hours; at Kelud it diminished and became negative after 14 h and at Calbuco it became negative after ~23 h. The negative differences were inferred to result from the fact that non-umbrella simulations distributed ash over a wider vertical extent in the plume, and that wind shear spread the cloud out in multiple directions. Thus, for some smaller eruptions, wind shear can produce a larger cloud than might be produced by umbrella spreading alone.

Calbuco volcano, Kelud volcano, Pinatubo volcano↗