USGS Science⌕ Search

USGS · 70283056

Climate-driven shifts in snowpack conditions favorable for wet snow avalanches: Insights from snow cover model simulations

Abstract

Forecasting wet snow avalanches remains a major challenge due to their temporal and spatial variability. Long-term climate trends are producing more variable and extreme weather, creating conditions outside historical experience, and increasing forecasting uncertainties. To assess how climate change affects the frequency and timing of wet snow avalanches, we examined the long-term conditions that support wet snow formation. Specifically, we ask: Will the onset of wet snow avalanche conditions or season end shift toward the mid century? And will maximum snow height decrease in avalanche starting zones? To address these questions, we analyze long-term snow cover simulations across our study site in Glacier National Park, Montana, located in an intermountain snow climate. We examined trends in simulated snow depth, and timing of liquid water infiltration over the past four decades (1979–2023) using a physically based snow cover model. To force the model with meteorological data, we use the long-term regional hydroclimate reanalysis dataset U.S. Geological Survey CONUS404 with 4 km spatial resolution and 1h temporal resolution. The use of gridded meteorological inputs to drive a one-dimensional point model introduces inherent scale mismatches. To address this limitation, we use multiple grid points within the study area to simulate a more representative, generalized snowpack, and filter the grid points based on elevation to distinguish between upper- and mid-elevation starting zones. Finally, we analyzed shifts in snow depth, melt-out-day, and LWCindex (bulk liquid water content (LWC) normalized by the residual water content). We use snow depth as a proxy for changes in slab thickness, the LWCindexas an indicator of wet snow avalanche conditions, and melt-out date as a measure of shifts in season length. We ran simulations on flat terrain and on north- and south-facing virtual slopes (38°), across mid-elevation (1,600–1,900 m) and upper-elevation (≥1,900 m) sites for the historical dataset as baseline and a Pseudo-Global-Warming (PGW) dataset to identify a warming driven shift. Across all aspects and both elevation bands, PGW forcing produces a consistent reduction in annual maximum snow depth (median shift −0.15 to −0.26 m, p<0.001) over 44 seasons, with the largest reductions on north-facing slopes and a modest but significant strengthening of this reduction over the 44-year simulated record. Melt-out starts 10–14 days earlier under PGW across all aspect–elevation combinations (p<0.001), again most pronounced on north-facing, higher-elevation terrain. The LWCindex threshold-crossing dates likewise shift earlier under PGW, indicating an earlier onset of wet snow avalanche conditions across the domain. Together, these results point to a snowpack that is both thinner and wetter earlier in the season under future warming, with the strongest signal consistently on north-facing slopes at higher elevation. This work lays the groundwork for climate-informed forecasting and mitigation and offers historical context for avalanche operations in a changing climate. Understanding long-term trends can help avalanche professionals interpret current observations, improve wet snow avalanche forecasting, and develop more effective mitigation strategies in a warming climate.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 48.16971779808773° to 49.0016388088892° latitude; -114.46808640264636° to -113.1760352579636° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Andrea Bruckemeier, Christoph Mitterer, Karl W. Birkeland, Eric Sproles, Erich Peitzsch. 2026-09-28. Climate-driven shifts in snowpack conditions favorable for wet snow avalanches: Insights from snow cover model simulations. https://doi.org/10.15788/1790099463

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Stability changes after weak layer collapse: Insights from an unexpected dataset

While conducting avalanche mitigation or traveling through the backcountry, avalanche professionals sometimes experience a "whumpf": a collapse-mode crack accompanied by surface cracking that does not produce an avalanche. These whumpfs are a clear warning sign of instability in the surrounding terrain. But assessing the collapsed slope itself, if it is steep enough to avalanche, carries much more uncertainty. Can slopes that whumpf and are steep enough to slide still avalanche? The answer to this question supports avalanche mitigators and ski guides in assessing whether to open such slopes. Previous research on collapsed slopes is limited to one study conducted before tests that estimate crack propagation propensity, such as the Propagation Saw Test (PST), were developed. This work showed that weak layer shear strength decreased immediately after collapsing and then increased over time. However, no research has examined crack propagation propensity after a whumpf. Studying propagation propensity is key for assessing how whumpfs immediately affect slope stability. To improve our understanding of changes in propagation propensity following weak layer collapse, we conducted PSTs on a test slope in the hours and days after an unexpected collapse occurred on a layer of surface hoar. Two PSTs at our study site three days prior to this collapse provided an estimate of weak layer propagation propensity. PST cut lengths decreased immediately following the collapse, suggesting that the collapse increased the propagation propensity. However, over the next 4-5 hours, PST cut lengths steadily increased at our site, likely due to ongoing sintering and strengthening in the collapsed weak layer. By the end of day two, we were no longer able to initiate propagation, suggesting substantial stabilization of the weak layer. Our results support prior findings and observations suggesting that slopes may remain capable of producing avalanches immediately after a collapse but likely stabilize over the next day or two. Although this research does not provide answers about precisely when a slope becomes stable after a collapse, it does highlight uncertainties in our understanding and interpretation of the stability of slopes that have whumped.

Montana↗

Revisiting avalanche destructive scale and associated mass estimates

Avalanche destructive (D) size classifications are essential for forecasting, communication, and risk management, yet size estimation remains one of the more subjective elements of avalanche assessment. Practitioners typically rely on visual impressions of destructive potential, path length, and estimated mass and volume. Recent work indicates that size is often underestimated even by experienced observers, especially when based on photographs or distant observations. Although mass is central to defining destructive size, the empirical foundations of mass–size relationships have rarely been revisited, and expert variability in size assignment could be decreased if more consistent operational tools were available. We evaluated whether a simple, practitioner-focused calculation tool using slab dimensions, snow density, and snow water equivalent can provide reliable mass estimates that correspond meaningfully with existing destructive size classes. Using this tool, we estimated avalanche mass and compared the results to observer-assigned D sizes. We also simulated mass outputs using a dense flow avalanche simulation module and compared observer estimates and simple-tool outputs to recent volume-based methods for D-size classification. Across 143 well-documented dry snow avalanches from multiple avalanche climates, the size estimation tool tends to classify avalanches larger than field-based observers. We found a mean bias of 0.47 D-size units and a typical (mean absolute) disagreement of 0.56. Our results show that 95% of events landed within one whole D-class of each other and 71% within a half-class. Agreement between the simple tool mass estimates and dense flow avalanche simulations was generally strong, though discrepancies emerged in cases with substantial entrainment or complex terrain. We compared the size tool to the simulation module with entrainment (n=4) and without entrainment (n=8). With entrainment, the two methods estimate the same D-size class in 4 of 4 comparable events and 7 of 8 events without entrainment. Also, the simulation module estimates larger sizes than the observer in 7 of 8 cases without entrainment and all 4 cases with entrainment. These findings support that development of practical, mass-based tools could improve D-size consistency and emphasize the value of revisiting historical mass–size relationships. The accompanying application offers practitioners an accessible and operationally useful resource for improving D-size estimation from field observations.

Conference Paper↗

Start-zone characteristics and timing of wet slab avalanches In Colorado

Wet slab avalanches (WSAs) release when liquid water reduces the strength of a buried weak layer or interface, and their timing is governed primarily by the snowpack energy balance and the movement of meltwater. We classified 717 WSAs from the Colorado Avalanche Information Center database (2011–2025) into five start-zone terrain categories and analysed the timing of naturally triggered, near- and above-treeline events using rank-based and Bayesian hierarchical methods. Start-zone terrain strongly governs the natural occurrence of WSAs: approximately 64% released in Rocky start zones (Cliffs/Rocks), while only ≈4% occurred on Open Slopes. After controlling for latitude and aspect, Rocky start zones released approximately five days before Open Slopes (90% CrI: 0.6–9.9 days). Latitude was the dominant timing predictor, shifting release by roughly 3–4 weeks from southern to northern Colorado. Cornice start zones concentrated WSA activity in early to mid-spring, with 40 of 41 releasing before mid-May. These findings support start-zone terrain classification as a low-cost addition to observation protocols for improving the spatial targeting of wet slab outlooks.

Colorado↗