USGS Science⌕ Search

USGS · 70283055

Applying automated avalanche terrain mapping to wildlife ecology: A case study of Dall's sheep in southcentral Alaska

Abstract

Avalanche hazard has been studied extensively in the context of human risk, but its role in alpine wildlife ecology remains poorly understood. Long-term telemetry studies have revealed that avalanches are an important source of mortality for some mountain ungulates. Investigating the processes underlying these events is challenging because avalanche activity and snowpack conditions are rarely monitored across the spatial and temporal extent of wildlife studies. Recent advances in automated avalanche terrain mapping provide a new opportunity to address this knowledge gap by quantifying wildlife exposure to modeled avalanche terrain across large landscapes. We demonstrate this application using Dall's sheep (Ovis dalli dalli) in southcentral Alaska, where a 12-year study identified avalanches as the leading known cause of adult mortality. We used GPS locations from 134 adult Dall's sheep (385 sheep-years) collected between 2012 and 2024 across Chugach State Park and the Talkeetna Mountains, Alaska, USA. We characterized seasonal patterns of terrain exposure using the Automated Avalanche Terrain Exposure Scale and complementary metrics representing potential release areas, runout terrain, slope, and aspect. Guided by previous studies of Dall's sheep habitat selection, we developed a priori ecological expectations for seasonal exposure and used descriptive summaries of GPS locations to examine patterns of sheep use. Sheep locations occurred almost exclusively within avalanche terrain throughout the year, with Complex terrain accounting for 61–67% of locations across seasons. Winter and spring locations occurred on slightly steeper slopes while simultaneously having lower potential release area values and lower-value runout terrain than summer and autumn locations. Use of south-facing terrain increased from 64% of locations in summer to 70% in autumn and winter and 83% in spring—coinciding with the highest seasonal concentration of avalanche mortality. These descriptive patterns illustrate how complementary avalanche-terrain metrics can reveal patterns of wildlife exposure that would not be apparent from slope angle and aspect alone. Integrating automated avalanche terrain mapping with wildlife telemetry provides a new approach for identifying patterns of terrain exposure to guide further investigation into factors influencing wildlife avalanche risk.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 60.933093530779416° to 62.4793223° latitude; -150.03156121483062° to -148.0393505° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Heather Thamm, John Sykes, Nicholas Fowler, Thomas Lohuis, Kyle Smith, Erich Peitzsch, Todd Brinkman, Ophelie Couriot. 2026-09-28. Applying automated avalanche terrain mapping to wildlife ecology: A case study of Dall's sheep in southcentral Alaska. https://doi.org/10.15788/1790099340

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Stability changes after weak layer collapse: Insights from an unexpected dataset

While conducting avalanche mitigation or traveling through the backcountry, avalanche professionals sometimes experience a "whumpf": a collapse-mode crack accompanied by surface cracking that does not produce an avalanche. These whumpfs are a clear warning sign of instability in the surrounding terrain. But assessing the collapsed slope itself, if it is steep enough to avalanche, carries much more uncertainty. Can slopes that whumpf and are steep enough to slide still avalanche? The answer to this question supports avalanche mitigators and ski guides in assessing whether to open such slopes. Previous research on collapsed slopes is limited to one study conducted before tests that estimate crack propagation propensity, such as the Propagation Saw Test (PST), were developed. This work showed that weak layer shear strength decreased immediately after collapsing and then increased over time. However, no research has examined crack propagation propensity after a whumpf. Studying propagation propensity is key for assessing how whumpfs immediately affect slope stability. To improve our understanding of changes in propagation propensity following weak layer collapse, we conducted PSTs on a test slope in the hours and days after an unexpected collapse occurred on a layer of surface hoar. Two PSTs at our study site three days prior to this collapse provided an estimate of weak layer propagation propensity. PST cut lengths decreased immediately following the collapse, suggesting that the collapse increased the propagation propensity. However, over the next 4-5 hours, PST cut lengths steadily increased at our site, likely due to ongoing sintering and strengthening in the collapsed weak layer. By the end of day two, we were no longer able to initiate propagation, suggesting substantial stabilization of the weak layer. Our results support prior findings and observations suggesting that slopes may remain capable of producing avalanches immediately after a collapse but likely stabilize over the next day or two. Although this research does not provide answers about precisely when a slope becomes stable after a collapse, it does highlight uncertainties in our understanding and interpretation of the stability of slopes that have whumped.

Montana↗

Revisiting avalanche destructive scale and associated mass estimates

Avalanche destructive (D) size classifications are essential for forecasting, communication, and risk management, yet size estimation remains one of the more subjective elements of avalanche assessment. Practitioners typically rely on visual impressions of destructive potential, path length, and estimated mass and volume. Recent work indicates that size is often underestimated even by experienced observers, especially when based on photographs or distant observations. Although mass is central to defining destructive size, the empirical foundations of mass–size relationships have rarely been revisited, and expert variability in size assignment could be decreased if more consistent operational tools were available. We evaluated whether a simple, practitioner-focused calculation tool using slab dimensions, snow density, and snow water equivalent can provide reliable mass estimates that correspond meaningfully with existing destructive size classes. Using this tool, we estimated avalanche mass and compared the results to observer-assigned D sizes. We also simulated mass outputs using a dense flow avalanche simulation module and compared observer estimates and simple-tool outputs to recent volume-based methods for D-size classification. Across 143 well-documented dry snow avalanches from multiple avalanche climates, the size estimation tool tends to classify avalanches larger than field-based observers. We found a mean bias of 0.47 D-size units and a typical (mean absolute) disagreement of 0.56. Our results show that 95% of events landed within one whole D-class of each other and 71% within a half-class. Agreement between the simple tool mass estimates and dense flow avalanche simulations was generally strong, though discrepancies emerged in cases with substantial entrainment or complex terrain. We compared the size tool to the simulation module with entrainment (n=4) and without entrainment (n=8). With entrainment, the two methods estimate the same D-size class in 4 of 4 comparable events and 7 of 8 events without entrainment. Also, the simulation module estimates larger sizes than the observer in 7 of 8 cases without entrainment and all 4 cases with entrainment. These findings support that development of practical, mass-based tools could improve D-size consistency and emphasize the value of revisiting historical mass–size relationships. The accompanying application offers practitioners an accessible and operationally useful resource for improving D-size estimation from field observations.

Conference Paper↗

Start-zone characteristics and timing of wet slab avalanches In Colorado

Wet slab avalanches (WSAs) release when liquid water reduces the strength of a buried weak layer or interface, and their timing is governed primarily by the snowpack energy balance and the movement of meltwater. We classified 717 WSAs from the Colorado Avalanche Information Center database (2011–2025) into five start-zone terrain categories and analysed the timing of naturally triggered, near- and above-treeline events using rank-based and Bayesian hierarchical methods. Start-zone terrain strongly governs the natural occurrence of WSAs: approximately 64% released in Rocky start zones (Cliffs/Rocks), while only ≈4% occurred on Open Slopes. After controlling for latitude and aspect, Rocky start zones released approximately five days before Open Slopes (90% CrI: 0.6–9.9 days). Latitude was the dominant timing predictor, shifting release by roughly 3–4 weeks from southern to northern Colorado. Cornice start zones concentrated WSA activity in early to mid-spring, with 40 of 41 releasing before mid-May. These findings support start-zone terrain classification as a low-cost addition to observation protocols for improving the spatial targeting of wet slab outlooks.

Colorado↗