USGS ScienceSearch

USGS · 70279318

Successes and opportunities for solutions-oriented conservation research: Lessons learned from avian science

Abstract

Conservation science struggles with an ongoing divide between research and action. Given its history of broad public engagement and multi-scale management coordination, avian conservation typifies many of the challenges, successes, and opportunities across the broader field of conservation and is rich with examples that may guide solutions-oriented conservation science. In semi-structured focus groups composed of bird conservation scientists and practitioners from various backgrounds, we discussed the definition, characteristics, and examples of solutions-oriented conservation science. Our discussions highlighted several examples where successful application of avian conservation science led to change in programs, policy, regulations, and social systems, including several with co-benefits for local communities. These successes were characterized by communication, collaboration, and co-development with local communities, decision-makers, practitioners, and Indigenous communities. We identified remaining opportunities for improvement, including aligning incentives and priorities between research and practice, working across disciplines to mobilize solutions, dismantling barriers to inclusion, and emphasizing the importance of relationship-building in conservation science. We outline suggestions that researchers can use to incorporate these lessons from solutions-oriented avian conservation science into training and mentoring programs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Rachel T. Buxton, Miguel F. Jimenez, Aalia I. Khan, Tori D. Bakley, Lisha L. Berzins, Barbara Frei, Elizabeth A. Gow, Autumn-Lynn Harrison, Osvel Hinojosa-Huerta, Andrea R. Norris, Brendon Samuels, Douglas C. Tozer, Eric M. Wood, Theodore J. Zenzal, Paul A. Smith, Catherine Jardine, Mark S. Woodrey, Bradley P. Wilkinson, Angeles Raymundo, Bryan B. Lenz. 2026-08-11. Successes and opportunities for solutions-oriented conservation research: Lessons learned from avian science. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.70376

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Connecting and coordinating conservation action across landscapes through regional planning processes and syntheses

Modern threats to conservation are often global; however, relevant conservation decisions and actions typically occur within local jurisdictions. The socio-ecological complexity of these problems requires collaboration across large landscapes, diverse community interests, and geopolitical boundaries, yet a lack of interoperability of planning products among decision makers, jurisdictions, and objectives impedes collaboration. Here, we provide a working model for the collaborative, iterative development of a landscape conservation design (LCD) in the Midwest region of the United States, the Midwest Conservation Blueprint, and demonstrate its applicability to the coordination of voluntary conservation actions and investments across jurisdictional boundaries. We used spatial prioritization software to synthesize over 20 datasets to develop a basemap of priority lands and waters for conservation across a diverse set of societal and ecological values (e.g., water quality, biodiversity, recreation). The Midwest Conservation Blueprint is a living plan, updated annually based on improvements in underlying data, understanding of local conditions, and public input. Landscape-scale planning is not designed to replace local knowledge or supersede decision-making authorities. However, by synthesizing existing data that represent diverse socio-ecological values and planning at a broader scale, the Midwest Conservation Blueprint documents where there are shared priorities and opportunities for collaborative landscape conservation.

Midwest

Debunking the myth of the quintessential resource manager: Precision in actionable science

“Actionable science” is a widely held standard for identifying the merits of natural resources research. Yet, science is often framed as actionable to a vaguely identified quintessential “manager” without defining either the intended manager or use. Generic descriptions lack precision for identifying end users or their needs, limiting methodological rigor in research design and leading to contextual misalignments of outputs with the need they intended to serve. Further, imprecise terminology limits the ability to evaluate impact, replicate efforts, or foster adoption and implementation of findings. This perspective article presents the heuristic of “who, what, when, where, why, how” to help researchers be more precise when describing their actionable science. Through intentional reflection, researchers can move beyond generic framings of “managers” representing monolithic organizations. “Managers” become individuals, with unique responsibilities, functions, worldviews, and levels of authority, all influencing their use of and need for scientific information and data.

Conservation Science and Practice

Management strategy evaluation for salmon habitat restoration and hatchery supplementation

A primary challenge in conservation is the evaluation of management actions. For species with complex life histories, this evaluation is particularly challenging, and quantitative models are needed to understand how effects on particular life stages translate to objectives such as an acceptably low extinction risk or large abundance. We modeled the effects of increasing juvenile survival (as would result from habitat restoration) and hatchery supplementation on the achievement of recovery objectives for endangered Chinook salmon ( Oncorhynchus tshawytscha ) in the Wenatchee River Basin of Washington State. We evaluated these actions using simulations with a model that accounted for density-dependence operating in juvenile rearing habitat. Simulations indicated that there were compounding benefits of increasing survival in both natal streams, where juveniles are born, and in downstream areas where a portion of juveniles rear. We also found that the marginal benefit of producing more hatchery fish declined as juvenile survival improved. Simulations suggested that achieving recovery targets for abundance of spring-run Chinook salmon in the Wenatchee River would require more than a 150% increase in juvenile survival, barring increases in survival in other portions of the life cycle. Therefore, comprehensive management focusing on multiple factors affecting survival may be required to meet recovery criteria.

Washington