Fitness consequences of catastrophic wildfire are mitigated by behavioral responses of an iconic bird

Abstract

Background Drought, human disturbance, and invasive species are reshaping disturbance regimes and increasing the scale, severity, and frequency of wildfire in many ecosystems around the globe, including the sagebrush steppe of western North America. Recent studies suggested greater sage-grouse ( Centrocercus urophasianus ) adhere to strong site fidelity in the aftermath of wildfire, remaining inside fire perimeters for nesting and brood rearing despite negative consequences for survival and reproduction. Sage-grouse in Idaho exhibited context-dependent changes to space use after a large, high-severity fire that burned > 40,000 ha, yet the specific behavioral responses to fire and their fitness consequences remain unclear. We used data collected from 269 hens over a 6-year period under a multi-level before-after-control-impact design to test the hypothesis that sage-grouse mitigated fitness consequences of high-severity wildfire through adaptive behavioral responses and spatial redistribution. Results We tested predictions deduced from our hypothesis at the population and individual levels using behavioral, demographic, and life history data, including nesting metrics, brood-rearing metrics, hen survival, and body mass at capture. Fifteen of 16 predictions were supported, demonstrating that post-fire space use and avoidance of the burn was adaptive and helped mitigate fitness effects of the fire. Short-term consequences included elimination of nesting and brood rearing habitat and subsequent shifts to the distribution of usable space. Yet fitness consequences were minimal because of behavioral flexibility employed by hens during nesting and brood rearing. Conclusions Behavioral responses to wildfire by sage-grouse are more flexible than has been described, and sage-grouse demonstrated resilience by rapidly adapting space use to avoid short-term consequences of catastrophic fire when high-quality habitat remained adjacent to the burn and within their seasonal range. Our results imply behavioral and fitness consequences of fire are context-dependent and likely impacted by attributes of the fire and surrounding landscape after disturbance. Furthermore, among-study differences in behavioral and fitness outcomes of sage-grouse after fire supported underappreciated predictions from both fire ecology and site fidelity theory, and suggest conditions where behavioral flexibility should be expressed, and fidelity relaxed, based on severity of disturbance, landscape context, and species mobility.