USGS · 70271354
Predicting Minnesota lake ice phenology with deep learning, explainable methods, and a physically based benchmark, 1980-2018
Abstract
Globally, lakes are losing ice cover, but our understanding of the rates and variability of change are biased toward few lakes with long-term records. Recent works have used remote sensing and predictive modeling to supplement the observational record, but these approaches produce large errors when estimating ice phenology for individual lakes. Accurate, lake-specific estimates of ice formation and breakup through time are important for estimating variability in ice loss across heterogenous lakes and for understanding broader implications. This work explores machine learning (ML) approaches for hindcasting ice phenology using observations from 1980 to 2018 across 625 Minnesota lakes, covering 4359 lake-years of record. We used daily weather and static lake attributes to develop 60 neural networks for hindcasting lake ice time series. We considered LSTMs and attention-based transformers of varying size and initial parameters. We found that the largest LSTM performed most accurately on withheld data, and on a test set of unseen years and lakes, it outperformed a state-of-the-art physically based model in daily accuracy (97% vs. 95%), year-level metrics (RMSE for ice formation = 6.9 vs. 13.2 days; ice breakup = 7.5 vs. 12.2 days; ice duration = 9.6 vs. 13.7 days), and estimating loss of ice cover from 1980 to 2018 (observed = 8.4 days, LSTM = 7.2 days, GLM = 3.4 days). This demonstrates that ML can estimate historical lake ice formation and breakup dates within a week of observed phenology across heterogeneous lakes and recreate broad scale trends in ice cover phenology with limited long-term ice records.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Jeremy Alejandro Diaz, Samantha K. Oliver, Simon N. Topp, Jordan S Read, Gretchen J.A. Hansen, Wallace Mcaliley. 2026-09-15. Predicting Minnesota lake ice phenology with deep learning, explainable methods, and a physically based benchmark, 1980-2018. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025wr042118
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.