USGS Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70267706

Points of consensus on catch-and-release: Considerations for science, ethics, and fisheries management

Matthew P. Corsi·Steven J. Cooke·Andy J. Danylchuk·Meaghan Guckian·Joseph Kozfkay·Michael C. Quist
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Catch-and-release (C&R), whether via regulations or voluntary actions, is typically employed with the intent of reducing ­fishing mortality while maintaining recreational angling opportunities (Isermann & Paukert, 2010), but there has been significant discourse about the relative importance of individual-level (see Cooke et al., 2025) vs. population-level (see Corsi et al., 2025) effects of C&R. We hope to offer the angling, scientific, and management communities some points of consensus from which this multifaceted dialogue on C&R can productively build. We preface this by noting that our collective views were informed by this process and the opportunity to share and learn from each other. What is apparent from this exercise is the value of embracing a holistic, cooperative approach. From a regulatory perspective, C&R is typically implemented in high-effort fisheries that are popular due to the quality of the fishing. Catch-and-release regulations are also applied in fisheries where populations have declined and fishing mortality is thought or, most appropriately, known to be a limiting factor for the population. When practiced voluntarily, anglers engaging in C&R can be characterized by high avidity and specialization, and angling is often a central component of their identity (e.g., Fisher, 1997). Due to their passion, avid anglers tend to spotlight the ethical, scientific, and regulatory considerations of C&R. As such, there is a need in fisheries management and science to understand in what situations these considerations transcend biological scales and how to navigate the gamut of voluntary actions and regulatory mandates. In this essay, we offer a distillation of the emergent consensus concepts that we hope managers and researchers will consider at both individual and population scales for legal, ethical, and scientific deliberations.

Explore related subjects

FisheriesArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Matthew P. Corsi, Steven J. Cooke, Andy J. Danylchuk, Meaghan Guckian, Joseph Kozfkay, Michael C. Quist. 2025-03-05. Points of consensus on catch-and-release: Considerations for science, ethics, and fisheries management. https://doi.org/10.1093/fshmag%2Fvuae024

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

An integrated drought early warning system to support coldwater fisheries management

Low streamflow resulting from drought and human water use is a threat to freshwater fisheries throughout western North America, creating a need for effective tools to aid management and fisheries use. We developed a drought early warning framework that forecasts river conditions that could result in temporary fishery closures and restrictions across Montana’s renowned trout fisheries. This tool provides reach-specific, probabilistic decision support for proactive management under drought conditions. We calibrated statistical models using historical streamflow and stream temperature data from U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) gauges to predict the likelihood of exceeding the low-flow and high-temperature thresholds for fisheries closure within 1- to 4-week outlooks during the warm season (May–October). These forecasts demonstrated consistently high model performance in predicting the criteria for low-flow fishing closure across all rivers (4-week outlook: mean R 2 = 0.96, IQR [interquartile range]: 0.94–0.97) and variable but often high model performance for temperature-based restriction criteria (mean R 2 = 0.80, IQR: 0.55–0.86), particularly at sites that frequently experience higher stream temperature conditions. This drought early warning system—available via the web-based tool TroutCast ( https://www.usgs.gov/apps/troutcast/ )—provides daily updated seasonal forecasts to help anticipate effects to recreational fishing opportunities. By quantifying forecast uncertainty and providing reach-specific probabilities, the system supports proactive management, improves coordination between fisheries and water managers, and provides stakeholders with actionable information on probable future effects on fishing access within a framework that is broadly applicable to other freshwater systems and water resource management challenges.

Montana↗
USGS2026

Strengthening ties between the U.S. Geological Survey and Interstate Fisheries Commissions

Fish inhabiting marine coastal and Great Lakes waters of the United States forage, migrate, and reproduce without regard to human-made boundaries. In the mid-20th century, the 32 states along the U.S. coasts and Great Lakes recognized the growing need for coordinated, interjurisdictional fisheries management and formed four interstate or international fisheries commissions through federal legislation. While distinct in their authorities, each commission shares functions to support their regional partners, including coordinating fisheries science and supporting information sharing. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is a federal bureau focused exclusively on science with substantial fisheries research capacity. This empowers USGS to serve as an independent broker of scientific information, which is greatly appreciated by decision-making agencies. The USGS does not maintain broad infrastructure for engaging partners across regions. Therefore, collaboration between the USGS and fisheries commissions ensures that USGS fisheries science helps address the most pressing interjurisdictional management priorities. The USGS has worked with fisheries commissions for decades to a greater or lesser extent in each of the four coastal regions: Atlantic, Pacific, Gulf, and Great Lakes. In 2020, the USGS began efforts to cohesively strengthen these partnerships across the regions. In 2024, leadership from four USGS fisheries science centers and headquarters met with the four fisheries commissions in person for the first time during the American Fisheries Society Annual Meeting. During the gathering, the new Interstate Fisheries Commissions–USGS Partnership developed coordination mechanisms and identified shared science priorities where the USGS capacity best aligns with the science needs of the commissions. Here we describe the history of collaboration between the USGS and fisheries commissions and the emerging interregional partnership.

Fisheries↗