USGS Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70263792

Surface rupture on a secondary fault associated with the August 8, 2020, Mw 5.1 Sparta North Carolina Earthquake

Charles Wicks·Jer-Ming Chiu
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

On August 8, 2020 northwest North Carolina experienced a M w 5.1 earthquake that caused damage to buildings and roads in the city of Sparta. A regional centroid moment tensor solution shows the earthquake was the result of slip on a reverse fault with a minor strike-slip component. InSAR data, from the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency’s ALOS2 satellite, reveal a deformation field that is more complex than expected from a single reverse fault earthquake. The data also reveal an apparent fault rupture at the Earth’s surface that caused damage to local roads. Modeling of the InSAR deformation field indicates the fault rupture is associated with a very shallow normal faulting event with an equivalent M w of about 5.1, that overprinted the reverse fault deformation field and possibly occurred aseismically.

Explore related subjects

The Seismic RecordArticle
90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 36.456479302893044° to 36.532296644809335° latitude; -81.17200973627948° to -81.0462093796463° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Charles Wicks, Jer-Ming Chiu. 2022-03-24. Surface rupture on a secondary fault associated with the August 8, 2020, Mw 5.1 Sparta North Carolina Earthquake. https://doi.org/10.1785/0320210044

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Investigating high‐resolution spatial variability of site response in the Los Angeles Basin using a dense sensor network

We characterize seismic site response across a densely instrumented region of the Los Angeles Basin by combining data from the Community Seismic Network (CSN) and regional networks in the Advanced National Seismic System (ANSS). Mixed-effects regression is used to partition ground-motion model residuals and compute pseudo-spectral acceleration site residuals (η s ) from the NGA-West2 ground motion database and a CSN dataset. For short periods ( T < 0.3 s), CSN and ANSS site residuals agree closely, while observed differences at longer periods are likely related to signal-to-noise limitations of the CSN sensors rather than sensor accuracy. Correlations between CSN and ANSS site residuals are high, and the dense CSN network reveals localized amplification not resolved by the ANSS network. Along the northeastern basin margin, PSA at 1 second reaches amplitudes up to approximately twice those predicted for reference rock conditions, consistent with basin-edge amplification effects. Systematic variations in site response are observed across major fault zones, particularly between [BSAS1.1]areas north of the Lower Elysian Park fault and between [BSAS2.1]the Lower Elysian Park and Puente Hills faults. These findings demonstrate the value of dense seismic networks, such as the CSN, for resolving localized amplification and improving seismic hazard assessment in urban sedimentary basins.

California↗
USGS2026

Only very strong shaking can break a tree

A handful of credible accounts, both recent and historical, describe trees being broken during earthquakes. Apart from landslides and tsunamis, such accounts are uncommon, suggesting that trees break only when ground acceleration is extreme or when trees are especially vulnerable to breakage. Here, I consider the question: what ground acceleration is required to break a living tree? I present simplified first‐principles calculations, considering the properties of common trees, focusing on tall, thin trees that can be approximated as uniform vertical cantilevers. The results suggest that, possibly excepting tall trees with heavy canopies, standing trees can only be broken by shaking approaching or exceeding 1 g , as anticipated by the rarity of documented accounts of snapped trees. I briefly consider several well‐documented instances of tree damage during strong earthquakes, drawing inferences about local ground motions.

The Seismic Record↗
USGS2026

Earthquake rupture arrest from depth‐dependent frictional stability on the Pütürge segment of the East Anatolian Fault Zone, Türkiye (Turkey)

Determining why earthquake ruptures stop is a central challenge in earthquake science and seismic hazard assessment. The Pütürge segment of the East Anatolian Fault Zone, Türkiye, exhibits shallow creep (<∼3 km depth) yet hosts M > 6.5 earthquake ruptures at greater depth. Here, we evaluate whether variations in frictional stability along this segment aided arrest of the 2020 M 6.7 Elaziğ and 2023 M 7.8 Pazarcık earthquake ruptures. Analysis of Sentinel‐1 Synthetic Aperture Radar imagery indicates the 2023 M 7.8 rupture propagated laterally into a metamorphic massif within the Pütürge segment, where slip rapidly decayed below detection limits. Creepmeters along this segment recorded no significant surface afterslip (<3 mm) in the following year. To investigate this fault‐slip behavior, we conducted triaxial friction experiments on Pütürge fault gouge sampled from an outcrop exposure. The gouge, composed primarily of muscovite, quartz, and calcite, is velocity strengthening at conditions approximating 0–2.5 km depth and velocity weakening at 4–5 km depth. This transition to velocity‐weakening friction is associated with enhanced comminution and shear localization observed microstructurally. Our results suggest that depth‐dependent frictional stability of the Pütürge fault segment facilitates rupture nucleation and propagation at depth while maintaining rupture‐arresting behavior near Earth’s surface.

Pütürge segment of the East Anatolian Fault Zone↗