USGS ScienceSearch

USGS · 70260403

Predictive modeling reveals elevated conductivity relative to background levels in freshwater tributaries within the Chesapeake Bay watershed, USA

Abstract

Elevated conductivity (i.e., specific conductance or SC) causes osmotic stress in freshwater aquatic organisms and may increase the toxicity of some contaminants. Indices of benthic macroinvertebrate integrity have declined in urban areas across the Chesapeake Bay watershed (CBW), and more information is needed about whether these declines may be due to elevated conductivity. A predictive SC model for the CBW was developed using monitoring data from the National Water Quality Portal. Predictor variables representing SC sources were compiled for nontidal reaches across the CBW. Random forests modeling was conducted to predict SC at four time periods (1999–2001, 2004–2006, 2009–2011, and 2014–2016), which were then compared to a national data set of background SC to quantify departures from background SC. Carbonate geology, impervious cover, forest cover, and snow depth were the most important variables for predicting SC. Observations and modeled results showed snow depth amplified the effect of impervious cover on SC. Elevated SC was predicted in two-thirds of reaches in the CBW, and these elevated conditions persisted over time in many areas. These results can be used in stressor identification assessments to prioritize future monitoring and to determine where management activities could be implemented to reduce salinization.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 36.48314061639213° to 42.98053954751642° latitude; -80.771484375° to -74.278564453125° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Rosemary M. Fanelli, Joel Moore, Charles C. Stillwell, Andrew J. Sekellick, Richard Walker. 2024-10-30. Predictive modeling reveals elevated conductivity relative to background levels in freshwater tributaries within the Chesapeake Bay watershed, USA. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.4c00589

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Comparative screening of private, public, and bottled drinking water in vitro bioactivity

This study compares in vitro bioactivity profiles of extracts from private tapwater (51 samples), public tapwater (143 samples), and bottled water (31 samples), using high-throughput, multiplex, transcription factor screening. Of 48 biological end points tested, 25 showed significant (≥50% above the field blank) activity. Frequently detected (≥10% of samples) bioactivities (in decreasing order) included xenobiotic metabolism (pregnane X receptor [ PXR ], aryl hydrocarbon receptor [ AhR ]), antioxidant response (antioxidant response element-binding nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 [ NRF2 ], activator protein 1 [ AP-1 ]), endocrine signaling (estrogen receptor [ ER ], peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor [ PPAR ]), and metals response (metals response element [ MRE ]). Significant bioactivities were observed across all drinking water supplies, with some statistical differences identified. Bioactivities were moderately to strongly correlated with several individual exposure and corresponding benchmark- or activity-weighted metrics, particularly for disinfection byproducts. Significant (α = 0.05) but weak correlations between measured bioactivity resemblance patterns and those of the inorganic–organic exposure, toxicity-quotient (TQ), and exposure-activity-ratio (EAR) resemblance matrices suggest that key drivers of observed drinking water bioactivity were not captured by the extensive, targeted exposure assessment. Results highlight the need for effects-based monitoring combined with improved exposure analysis to better assess health risks from low-level contaminant mixtures in drinking water.

ES&T Water

Detection of viral, bacterial, and protozoan pathogens and microbial source tracking markers in paired large- and small-volume water samples

When sampling for waterborne microbes, researchers may need to diverge from recommended sample volumes due to logistical constraints, novel targets, or challenging matrices, with little guidance about the potential impact on results. In field studies, we measured bacteria, viruses, and protozoa (15 quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays) in paired large- and small-volume samples to evaluate method performance and relevant factors. Concordance between methods was low. Large-volume ultrafiltration yielded more detections than small-volume sampling, especially for pathogens in groundwater. Greater microbial concentrations were associated with more frequent detections in small-volume samples and greater concordance between paired samples. Large-volume samples appeared to be more susceptible to diminished sensitivity from complex sample matrices. In laboratory studies, recovery of microbes was poorer for large- than small-volume methods, although large-volume methods more reliably detected low-concentration targets. Large-volume samples were less stable than small-volume samples during storage. Overall, large-volume sampling was superior for detecting pathogens but may underestimate concentrations; small-volume sampling was more prone to false negatives but was adequate when concentrations were relatively high, like we observed for microbial source tracking in surface waters.

Wisconsin