USGS Science⌕ Search

USGS · 70259095

Comparison of imaging flow cytometry and microscopy for freshwater algal bloom detection

Abstract

Imaging flow cytometry (IFC) is an emerging tool that allows for rapid identification and enumeration of phytoplankton in freshwater systems. However, few studies have assessed the effects of preservation on IFC results or compared live IFC and microscopy results in freshwater systems. Understanding the effects of preservation and differences between IFC and microscopy will improve interpretation of these data and inform strategies to use IFC-based approaches in freshwater systems. Our study objectives were to compare IFC and phase contrast with epifluorescence microscopy as techniques for phytoplankton identification and enumeration, and the effects of sample preservation with an emphasis on taxa forming harmful cyanobacterial blooms (HCBs). During June through October 2020, samples were collected from 2 lakes in the Finger Lakes region of New York. Live and preserved samples were analyzed by laboratory-based IFC, and preserved samples were analyzed by microscopy. The IFC approach captured community dynamics while detecting potential cyanobacterial bloom-forming taxa earlier and at lower abundances than microscopy. Laboratory-based IFC allowed for an intermediate level of taxonomic information when compared to microscopy, gross techniques, such as extracted chlorophyll a or fluorescence sensors, and field-based operation of IFC approaches. The laboratory-based application of IFC in this study allowed receipt of results in 5 d or less, a substantial improvement over microscopy, which can be time-consuming to conduct. However, the laboratory-based IFC approach had some limitations. Imaging flow cytometry-estimated biovolume may be less accurate than microscopy for some taxa because of the algorithms used to calculate biovolume, particularly for chrysophytes and coccoid cyanobacteria. Colonial dissociation during preservation appeared to affect detection of Microcystis by IFC less than for other fragile bloom-forming taxa like chrysophytes. Our study results advance understanding of how IFC may translate to field-based approaches for early harmful algal bloom indicators in freshwater.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sabina R. Gifford, A. St. Amand, Jennifer L. Graham, Guy M. Foster, Cory Sauve, Denise Clark, Hannah Schroeder-Larkins. 2024-08-09. Comparison of imaging flow cytometry and microscopy for freshwater algal bloom detection. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402381.2024.2370828

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Integration of multiple methodologies as an indicator of cyanotoxin occurrence in Owasco Lake, New York

Cyanobacteria harmful algal blooms (cyanoHABs) pose environmental and public health risks in lakes with highly variable cyanobacteria and cyanotoxin distributions. We compared results from 3 independent monitoring programs to characterize spatiotemporal patterns in the stratified, mesotrophic Owasco Lake, one of the Finger Lakes in New York. Biweekly open-water samples collected at multiple depths in 2019 and 2020 were analyzed for phytoplankton community composition, chlorophyll a , cyanotoxins, and cyanotoxin synthetase gene targets. These data were examined alongside shoreline reports and microcystin measurements from 2 public water supply intakes. Open-water cyanobacterial biovolume was generally low but increased sharply during late summer Microcystis -dominated events. Microcystin was the only cyanotoxin detected and occurred infrequently; detections at drinking water intakes coincided with or followed open-water and shoreline bloom reports. The mcyE gene target was detected weeks before microscopy or cyanotoxin analyses indicated cyanoHAB development and persisted later. Relations among cyanobacterial biovolume, chlorophyll a , gene targets, and cyanotoxins were generally weak (the relations explained small proportions of the variability in the response variables), indicating ephemeral bloom dynamics and low overall biomass. Comparison across programs revealed a consistent sequence: early mcyE detection, shoreline bloom reports, open-water increases in cyanobacteria, sparse microcystin detections, and then detections at drinking water intakes. These findings demonstrate how genetic, chemical, and visual approaches can be combined across depths and monitoring entities. Routine genetic analyses in open water may provide early indications of toxigenic potential, support tiered monitoring frameworks, and inform management of recreational and drinking water risks in large lakes.

New York↗

Water quality-based risk assessment for zebra mussel establishment: A case study of single- and multiple-factor methods in northern temperate lakes

Most previous research has used an individual water quality parameter, such as calcium, to predict likelihood of zebra mussel establishment in lakes; we employed two multiple-factor methods, our own susceptibility index for zebra mussels in lakes (SIZL) and aragonite saturation state, to evaluate the risk of mussel establishment. Thirty sites in Voyageurs National Park (VNP) were sampled in 2023 for water quality conditions, including those that play a key role in mussel survivability. These results were combined with existing data sets to determine which lakes, and which locations within the larger lakes, are at greatest risk for zebra mussel establishment. Results for VNP indicate that physical lake characteristics and water quality conditions (both single- and multiple-factor methods) put the large, interconnected lakes in VNP at greater risk of zebra mussel establishment than the smaller interior lakes. All sampled interior lakes had alkalinity and calcium concentrations below thresholds conducive to zebra mussel establishment, although Mukooda and O’Leary lakes were identified as the most at-risk interior lakes. The area in the large lakes most at risk was Sullivan Bay in Kabetogama Lake, where water quality conditions were found to be conducive to zebra mussel establishment. Results from this study could be used by resource managers to focus additional inspections, decontaminations, and regulations to protect the most at-risk lakes. These multiple-factor methods may be useful in determining the risk of zebra mussel infestation in other water bodies.

Minnesota↗

Geochemical assessment of the suitability of converting a coal-fired power plant reservoir to a drinking-water reservoir

There is an increasing need for additional water storage in the United States, especially in arid regions. Alternatives like decommissioned power plant raw-water reservoirs would be cheaper to use than creating new reservoirs; however, the biogeochemical pollution risk of these reservoirs is not well understood. The San Juan Generating Station power plant and the associated reservoir will be used as a sediment-settling basin to store drinking water. To evaluate whether the reservoir is appropriate for this use, inorganic and organic constituents of concern were measured in reservoir sediment cores, pore water, and reservoir water in 2020. Forty-six percent of sediment arsenic concentrations measured in core subsamples (8 to 12 mg/kg) were slightly above the New Mexico residential cancer threshold for soil of 7.07 mg/kg. One sediment sample contained elevated total barium concentrations (6020 mg/kg). The organic compounds analyzed were either below detection limits or below regulatory thresholds. Reservoir water had one sample with arsenic greater than the drinking water standard (10 µg/L). Overall, the reservoir sediment inorganic and organic analyte concentrations are within acceptable ranges. The few samples that have elevated concentrations are not of a sufficient magnitude that dilution and/or treatment processes would preclude the use of the reservoir for water storage. Our findings show potential for use of former coal power station raw-water reservoirs as drinking-water reservoirs after plant closure.

New Mexico↗