Survey evaluation of Florida’s freshwater fisheries long-term monitoring program

Kimberly I. Bonvechio; Ramesh Paudyal; Chelsey Crandall; Andrew Kenneth Carlson

doi:10.3390/fishes8040216

Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70256478

Survey evaluation of Florida’s freshwater fisheries long-term monitoring program

Kimberly I. Bonvechio·Ramesh Paudyal·Chelsey Crandall·Andrew Kenneth Carlson

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Natural resource monitoring programs benefit from routine evaluation. Here, Florida’s statewide Freshwater Fisheries Long-Term Monitoring (LTM) program is used to show how stakeholder surveys can be integral to this process. In 2022, an online questionnaire was sent to internal stakeholders, i.e., state agency personnel who collect, enter, or use freshwater fisheries data for fisheries and habitat management purposes. The survey’s primary objective was to evaluate the program at its 15-year mark; secondary objectives were to compare results with a similar survey conducted at the 4-year mark, compare results among respondents based on experience and functional role, and develop recommendations for strategic initiatives to further improve the program. The survey consisted of 43 questions across six sections of program evaluation: demographics; field sampling; data entry, summary, and reporting; management decision support; programmatic views; and additional input. Respondents generally had positive views of the LTM program, but the survey revealed differences among respondents with different functional roles (e.g., fisheries researchers and managers viewed the decisional value, priority, and sample sizes of LTM data more favorably than habitat managers) while highlighting high-priority future initiatives (e.g., database development). Our results demonstrate the utility of stakeholder surveys as an important step in evaluating monitoring programs.

Explore related subjects

Fishes Article

Source-reported bounding extent: 24.546468° to 31.000682° latitude; -87.634938° to -80.031362° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Kimberly I. Bonvechio, Ramesh Paudyal, Chelsey Crandall, Andrew Kenneth Carlson. 2023-04-19. Survey evaluation of Florida’s freshwater fisheries long-term monitoring program. https://doi.org/10.3390/fishes8040216

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2025

Assessing fish growth changes under an ecosystem regime shift: The approach of linear mixed-effects modeling with application to Lake Huron lake trout

Linear mixed-effects modeling has been used to characterize fish growth changes over time, but early studies did not fully consider the implicit relationship among the three major factors of fish age, year-class, and sampling year in model development. Our objective is to resolve this issue and develop a linear mixed-effects model to clearly assess how lake trout ( Salvelinus namaycush ) growth has responded to the ecosystem regime shift in Lake Huron. We found that, from the late 1970s through the early 2000s, lake trout weight-at-age in northern Lake Huron had large variation with no apparent temporal trend, whereas the weight-at-age in southern Lake Huron steadily declined but remained larger than that in northern Lake Huron. The difference between northern and southern Lake Huron almost disappeared prior to the 2003 collapse of alewives, which accelerated the weight-at-age declines during the 2000s in both regions. By 2010, lake trout growth had a modest recovery and then stabilized. Our model fitted and explained variation in lake trout weight-at-age between years, regions, and recruitment origins, with the fixed age effect representing the general growth trajectory, the fixed year effect as the year-specific growth index, and the random year-class effect as the cohort-specific growth index.

Lake Huron↗

USGS2025

Comparing year-class strength indices from longitudinal analysis of catch-at-age data with those from catch-curve regression: Application to Lake Huron lake trout

Fish year-class strength (YCS) has been estimated via longitudinal analysis of catch-at-age data and via catch-curve regression, but no study has compared the two approaches. The objective of this study was to compare YCS estimates derived from both approaches applied to catch-at-age data for the lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) population in the main basin of Lake Huron, one of the Laurentian Great Lakes of North America. YCS was reconstructed for both hatchery-stocked and wild lake trout. Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) were used to compare 14 linear mixed-effects models for longitudinal analysis of catch-at-age data, and three linear mixed-effects models for catch-curve regression. From the best models based on AIC or BIC comparisons, YCS estimates with year-class as a fixed effect were consistent with those estimated with year-class as a random effect. Patterns and trends in the YCS estimates were also the same or similar between the longitudinal analysis of catch-at-age data approach and the catch-curve regression approach, suggesting that both modeling approaches are applicable to a variety of fish populations. indicating that both approaches provide robust measures of YCS. Potential bias in using the approach of catch-curve regression could be caused by abrupt changes in adult mortality. It is also critical to recognize multiple recruitment origins for using the approach of longitudinal analysis of catch-at-age data.

Lake Huron↗

USGS2025

A review of standardization in Mississippi’s multidecadal inland fisheries monitoring program

Standardizing data collection, management, and analysis processes can improve the reliability and efficiency of fisheries monitoring programs, yet few studies have examined the operationalization of these tasks within agency settings. We reviewed the Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks, Fisheries Bureau’s inland recreational fisheries monitoring program—a 30+-year effort to standardize field protocols, data handling procedures, and automated analyses through a custom-built computer application, the Fisheries Resources Analysis System (FRAS). Drawing on quantitative summaries of sampling trends and qualitative interviews with fisheries managers, we identified key benefits, challenges, and opportunities associated with the Bureau’s standardization efforts. Standardized procedures improved sampling consistency, data reliability, and operational efficiency, enabling the long-term tracking of fish population and angler metrics across more than 270 managed waterbodies. However, challenges related to analytical transparency and spatiotemporal comparisons persist. Simulations indicated that under current conditions, 5.8, 22.9, and 37.1 years would be required to sample (boat electrofishing) 50%, 75%, and 95% of the Bureau’s waterbodies at least once, respectively; these figures should translate to other agencies, assuming similar resource availability per waterbody. The monitoring program has reduced manual processing effort and enhanced staff capacity for waterbody-specific management, yet several opportunities remain to improve efficiency and utility. These include expanding FRAS functionalities for trend visualization, integrating mobile field data entry to reduce transcription errors, linking monitoring results with management objectives, and enhancing automated report generation for management support. Strengthening these elements could not only streamline workflows but better position agencies to apply standardized data in adaptive management embedded into the monitoring program.

Mississippi↗