USGS Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70253923

Sight and blindness: The relationship between ostracod eyes, water depth, and light availability in the Arctic Ocean

Jingwen Zhang·Moriaki Yasuhara·Chih-Lin Wei·Skye Yunshu Tian·Kyawt K. T. Aye·Laura Gemery·Thomas M. Cronin·Peter Frenzel·David J. Horne
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Eye loss has been a long-standing interest in evolutionary biology. Many organisms that inhabit environments without light penetration, for example the deep sea, exhibit eye loss and thus become blind. However, water-depth distribution of eyes in marine organisms is poorly understood. Ostracods are widely distributed crustaceans, and many sighted marine ostracods have eye tubercles (lenses) on their shells. Since eye tubercles are visible on the shells illustrated in much literature, it is easy to determine their presence or absence via a literature survey. Here, we used a large Arctic-wide ostracod census dataset (Arctic Ostracode Database) to calculate the eye index (the percentage of species with eyes), and compare them with water depth and light availability. As water depth increases, eye index values decrease and become constantly zero in water deeper than 1000 m. Similar decline of sighted species with increasing depth is also known in isopods and amphipods, suggesting that it may be common in other crustaceans and perhaps in deep-sea organisms in general. We also show that eye index values increase as light availability increases. This study is the first to quantify how distributions of sighted and blind species change with light availability, giving baseline information on vision in the deep sea.

Explore related subjects

Limnology and OceanographyArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jingwen Zhang, Moriaki Yasuhara, Chih-Lin Wei, Skye Yunshu Tian, Kyawt K. T. Aye, Laura Gemery, Thomas M. Cronin, Peter Frenzel, David J. Horne. 2024-05-15. Sight and blindness: The relationship between ostracod eyes, water depth, and light availability in the Arctic Ocean. https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.12584

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Increasing artificial light at night enhances salmonid predator foraging efficiency in an urbanized lake

Artificial light at night (ALAN) poses a threat to ecosystems globally. It includes both direct and indirect light, or skyglow, which occurs when ALAN scatters in the atmosphere, extending beyond its original source. We analyzed ALAN trends in Lake Washington, WA, from 2014 to 2023 using Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) nighttime light measurements, evaluated the relationship between in situ and satellite measurements, and modeled predator search volumes for a juvenile salmon predator, cutthroat trout ( Oncorhynchus clarki ), as a function of ambient light and turbidity conditions. Open water regions experienced significant increases in ALAN, while nearshore areas primarily showed no or negative trends, revealing the role of skyglow in shaping open water light environments. Using a visual foraging model for cutthroat trout, we found that juvenile salmon at the shallow southern pelagic site experienced light 28 times brighter, resulting in a 168% greater predation vulnerability than those at the northern site. In the Ship Canal, a narrow corridor for outmigrating salmon, predator search volumes were 249% higher than at the southern site. These contrasts in predation vulnerability demonstrate how local conditions influence predator–prey dynamics and provide critical insight for targeting mitigation of both nearshore and distant light sources.

Washington↗
USGS2026

Temperate lake heatwaves accelerate non-linearly as timing synchronizes across a diverse landscape

Temperate lakes are experiencing intensifying heatwaves, or prolonged periods of anomalously warm water, with potentially severe ecological consequences. Previous studies have predominantly used linear trend analyses to understand heatwave dynamics, potentially masking temporal acceleration patterns and shifts in variance. Here, we analyzed long-term, nonlinear trends in heatwave frequency, intensity, and timing across 4391 New York lakes using simulated daily surface water temperatures from an Entity-Aware Long Short-Term Memory deep learning model (validated root mean square error = 1.82°C; 1980–2020). We applied generalized additive mixed models to quantify complex temporal patterns while accounting for lake-specific effects and environmental characteristics (lake surface area, elevation, and latitude). All heatwave metrics demonstrated nonlinear and dynamic temporal trends. Heatwave frequency showed early increases in the number of events (0.05–1.32 events during the 1980s) followed by accelerated growth after 2000; other metrics exhibited more complex decadal patterns. Temporal variance increased significantly for both heatwave frequency ( τ = 0.73, p < 0.001) and intensity ( τ = 0.33, p = 0.003). Lake characteristics drove some heatwave dynamics; smaller lakes experienced higher intensities and complex elevation-latitude interactions varying by heatwave metric. Spatial patterns revealed increasing heterogeneity for heatwave intensity and frequency while heatwave timing homogenized to earlier dates across the landscape. Our findings reveal nonlinear heatwave dynamics with increasing variability, which may reduce predictability and intensify ecological vulnerabilities beyond current projections.

New York↗
USGS2025

Unique thermal mixing patterns in Lake Ontario revealed by novel year-round observations of thermal stratification

Year-round records of thermal stratification in the Great Lakes are rare, and there are few observations of thermal stratification during winter. In this paper, we analyze temperature data from 13 temperature logger chains and from over 130 benthic acoustic receivers that were deployed across Lake Ontario for 2 yr. The timing and duration of the fall overturn correlate with the local average water depth, and shallow sites (< 50 m depth) overturn up to a month before deep sites (> 100 m depths). Likewise, in spring, the shallow sites warm faster. Lake Ontario has partial ice cover, so wind-driven mixing stirs the water column throughout winter, and inverse thermal stratification is largely absent. The depth-averaged winter water temperatures vary between 0°C and 4°C, with the coldest temperatures (near 0.1°C) found in the shallow Kingston basin and warmest temperatures (near 4°C) at sites near the 244 m deep Rochester Basin. Lake Ontario appears to be a warm monomictic lake, rather than having a dimictic mixing pattern as previously described—there is no sustained ice cover or inverse stratification that inhibits vertical mixing in winter. Winter is a poorly understood season for many aquatic processes, including fish bioenergetics, fish distribution, biochemical processes, invertebrate distribution, and production. Moreover, the lack of knowledge of winter has hampered the use of correct initial conditions for running large lake hydrodynamic models.

Lake Ontario↗