Vegetation, fuels, and fire-behavior responses to linear fuel-break treatments in and around burned sagebrush steppe: Are we breaking the grass-fire cycle?

Matthew J. Germino; Samuel J. Price; Susan J Prichard

doi:10.1186/s42408-024-00266-y

Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70252765

Vegetation, fuels, and fire-behavior responses to linear fuel-break treatments in and around burned sagebrush steppe: Are we breaking the grass-fire cycle?

Matthew J. Germino·Samuel J. Price·Susan J Prichard

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Background Linear fuel breaks are being implemented to moderate fire behavior and improve wildfire containment in semiarid landscapes such as the sagebrush steppe of North America, where extensive losses in perennial vegetation and ecosystem functioning are resulting from invasion by exotic annual grasses (EAGs) that foster large and recurrent wildfires. However, fuel-break construction can also pose EAG invasion risks, which must be weighed against the intended fire-moderation benefits of the treatments. We investigated how shrub reductions (mowing, cutting), pre-emergent EAG-herbicides, and/or drill seedings of fire-resistant perennial bunchgrasses (PBGs) recently applied to create a large fuel-break system affected native and exotic plant abundances and their associated fuel loading and predicted fire behavior. Results In heavily EAG-invaded areas, herbicides reduced EAG and total herbaceous cover without affecting PBGs for 2–3 years and reduced predicted fire behavior for 1 year (from the Fuel Characteristic Classification System). However, surviving post-herbicide EAG cover was still > 30%, which was sufficient fuel to exceed the conventional 1.2-m-flame length (FL) threshold for attempting wildfire suppression with hand tools. In less invaded shrubland, shrub reduction treatments largely reduced shrub cover and height by ~ half without increasing EAGs, but then redistributed the wood to ground level and increased total herbaceous cover. Herbicides and/or drill seeding after shrub reductions did not affect EAG cover, although drill seedings increased PBG cover and exotic forbs (e.g., Russian thistle). Fire behavior was predicted to be moderated in only one of the many yearly observations of the various shrub-reduction treatment combinations. Over all treatments and years, FLs were predicted to exceed 1.2 m in 13% of simulations under average (11 km h −1 ) or high (47 km h −1 ) wind speed conditions and exceed the 3.4-m threshold for uncontrollable fire in 11% of simulations under high-wind speeds only. Conclusions Predicted fire-moderation benefits over the first 4 years of fuel break implementation were modest and variable, but, generally, increases in EAGs and their associated fire risks were not observed. Nonetheless, ancillary evidence from shrublands would suggest that treatment-induced shifts from shrub to herbaceous fuel dominance are expected to improve conditions for active fire suppression in ways not readily represented in available fire models.

Explore related subjects

Fire Ecology Article

Source-reported bounding extent: 42.9558610868508° to 43.65567830784602° latitude; -117.19933831765053° to -116.38187715866083° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Matthew J. Germino, Samuel J. Price, Susan J Prichard. 2024-04-02. Vegetation, fuels, and fire-behavior responses to linear fuel-break treatments in and around burned sagebrush steppe: Are we breaking the grass-fire cycle?. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-024-00266-y

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Tracking decadal changes in frequent fire activity across the southeastern U.S. (2000-2019): Insights from Southeast FireMap

Background The dominant natural habitats in the southeastern United States depend on frequent fire ignited by humans or lightning. However, fire activity has sharply declined in the region since the early 1900s, and reduced fire activity has degraded natural habitats and increased wildfire risk. Identifying changes in fire use during recent decades is necessary to guide the conservation of fire-dependent wildlife, management of hazardous fuels, and identify areas where increased fire use could improve ecosystem resilience. To address this need, we created the Southeast FireMap dataset by fine-tuning the United States Geological Survey’s Landsat Burned Area product to track burned area, and provide a fire history across the southeastern United States. We used the Southeast FireMap data to quantify changes in areas frequently burned, as measured by areas with multiple burns within a decade. We compared the periods 2000–2009 and 2010–2019 to identify where frequently burned area is increasing or declining. We examined patterns of change across ownership, land cover, and soil orders to provide geographic context, and we considered future implications of these changes for land use categories of ecological interest. Results Frequently burned area increased between decades across the region. This increase occurred on both private and public lands, in upland vegetation types, and on upland soils, though these increases were moderately offset by decreased wetland burning and its associated soil orders. However, changes varied among states, with burned area decreasing in some states. Conclusions The overall increase in frequently burned area across the region reflects a summation of positive and negative shifts associated with specific combinations of physiography, ownership class, and government jurisdiction. Southeast FireMap marks a significant advancement in our ability to identify changes in prescribed burning within the geographic and cultural contexts that will likely influence the complex future of fire in the region.

southeastern United States↗

USGS2026

Recovery trajectories of surface fuels and forest trees following prescribed fire in low elevation conifer forests of California and southern Oregon

Background Prescribed fire is commonly used to manage surface fuels and stand structure in dry coniferous forests in the western United States. While the effectiveness of prescribed fire to manage fuel loads and live forest structure has been well documented, less is known about the shape of recovery trajectories more than a decade following treatment. We used up to 30 years of longitudinal observations from > 180 monitoring plots treated with a single prescribed fire-only treatment across six national parks in California and Oregon to compare competing recovery trajectory models: generalized linear models (GLM) that presumed exponential trajectories over time, generalized additive models (GAM) that had maximum flexibility to fit responses, and generalized Michaelis–Menten models that describe an asymptotic recovery trajectory. Results The Michaelis–Menten model had the lowest median RMSE of the fuel recovery models, with predicted recovery times and maximal fuel loads tending to increase with increasing fuel particle size. However, predictive performance was similar between model forms. GAM best predicted forest structure, showing that stem density of live overstory trees (> 15 cm stem diameter) declined immediately following prescribed fire without appreciable postfire accumulation. Results for live stem biomass were similar, but with less pronounced reductions. Conclusions We found that reductions in surface fuel biomass from a single prescribed fire-only treatment can last for more than a decade for some fuel types. Our analysis also demonstrates that asymptotic models reasonably describe surface fuel recovery trajectories. However, we lack the evidence to definitively conclude that asymptotic models best describe postfire recovery, even with repeated observations of up to three decades postfire. We also found that stem density and biomass of live trees with stem diameter > 15 cm both declined in the first few years immediately following the fire, after which they remained relatively unchanged for the remainder of the observation period.

California, Oregon↗

USGS2026

Effects of repeat prescribed burning in dry coniferous forests in national parks of California

Background Prescribed fire is a common approach to reduce fuels and mitigate fire hazards. The accumulation of live and dead fuels following initial treatment means that repeated application of prescribed fire could be used to maintain this benefit. However, the effect of repeated prescribed fires is not well documented in many dry coniferous forests in the western United States. Here, we present observations of changes in live trees and surface fuels following two prescribed fires in dry coniferous forests in national parks of California. Results Changes in forest structure and accumulation of surface fuels were similar over time following initial-entry and second-entry fires. An exception was that repeated fires were associated with substantial reductions in stem density. There were smaller changes in live tree basal area and stem biomass. Conclusions Our results indicate that following initial-entry fires, subsequent burning maintained reductions in surface fuel loads without major inadvertent losses of live tree basal area and stem biomass, implying the survival of large trees.

California↗