USGS Science⌕ Search

USGS · 70250750

Range-wide trends in tiger conservation landscapes, 2001 - 2020

Abstract

Of all the ways human beings have modified the planet over the last 10,000 years, habitat loss is the most important for other species. To address this most critical threat to biodiversity, governments, non-governmental actors, and the public need to know, in near real-time, where and when habitat loss is occurring. Here we present an integrated habitat modelling system at the range-wide scale for the tiger ( Panthera tigris ) to measure and monitor changes in tiger habitat at range-wide, national, biome, and landscape scales, as often as the underlying inputs change. We find that after nearly 150 years of decline, effective potential habitat for the tiger seems to have stabilized at around 16% of its indigenous extent (1.817 million km 2 ). As of the 1st of January 2020, there were 63 Tiger Conservation Landscapes in the world, covering 911,920 km 2 shared across ten of the 30 modern countries which once harbored tiger populations. Over the last 20 years, the total area of Tiger Conservation Landscapes (TCLs) declined from 1.025 million km 2 in 2001, a range-wide loss of 11%, with the greatest losses in Southeast Asia and southern China. Meanwhile, we documented expansions of modelled TCL area in India, Nepal, Bhutan, northern China, and southeastern Russia. We find significant potential for restoring tigers to existing habitats, identified here in 226 Restoration Landscapes. If these habitats had sufficient prey and were tigers able to find them, the occupied land base for tigers might increase by 50%. Our analytical system, incorporating Earth observations, in situ biological data, and a conservation-oriented modelling framework, provides the information the countries need to protect tigers and enhance habitat, including dynamic, spatially explicit maps and results, updated as often as the underlying data change. Our work builds on nearly 30 years of tiger conservation research and provides an accessible way for countries to measure progress and report outcomes. This work serves as a model for objective, range-wide, habitat monitoring as countries work to achieve the goals laid out in the Sustainable Development Goals, the 30×30 Agenda, and the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Eric W. Sanderson, Dale G. Miquelle, Kim Fisher, Abishek Harihar, Chris Clark, Jesse Moy, Peter V. Potapov, Nathaniel P. Robinson, Lucinda Royte, Dustin Sampson, Jamie S Sanderlin, Charles B. Yackulic, Michael Belecky, Urs Breitenmoser, Christine Breitenmoser-Wursten, Pranav Chanchani, Stuart Chapman, Arpit Deomurari, Somphot Duangchantrasiri, Elisa Facchini, Thomas N.E. Gray, John Goodrich, Luke Hunter, Matthew Linkie, Willy Marthy, Akchousanh Rasphone, Sogoto Roy, Detrit Sittibal, Tshering Tempa, Mayuree Umponjan, Karen Wood. 2023-12-08. Range-wide trends in tiger conservation landscapes, 2001 - 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2023.1191280

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Mountain lion prey-selection in a community comprised of native and introduced ungulate species

Species introductions are a hallmark of human influence on ecosystems worldwide. In communities where native and introduced fauna coexist, predators may select prey based on availability or vulnerability. Free-roaming feral horses ( Equus caballus ) are a recent addition to North America and have become widespread, abundant, and in some areas serve as major prey for mountain lions ( Puma concolor ), a native carnivore. The proliferation of horses as well as potential effects of mountain lion predation on native ungulates create ecological and social management challenges; our goal was to assess mountain lion prey selection in a system composed of native mule deer ( Odocoileus hemionus ) and introduced feral horses. Our objectives were to: (1) describe seasonal patterns of prey use within individual mountain lion home ranges; (2) quantify prey use relative to availability; and (3) determine seasonal kill rates on the two primary ungulates in the study area. Fieldwork occurred in southeastern Nevada, 2021–2022. We identified prey use by investigating cache sites from 6 GPS-collared mountain lions. Prey availability and relative abundance were estimated with 49 camera traps distributed across the 3,158-km² study area. During the growing season, weekly kill rates averaged 0.22 deer and 0.55 horses, and in winter, 1.43 deer and 0.33 horses. Thus, lions killed horses at 2.54 times the rate of deer in the growing season but deer at 4.33 times the rate of horses in winter. Model selection indicated mule deer density and prey age class were the strongest predictors of prey species. Lions selected adult deer over fawns, and foals over adult horses, suggesting choices may be driven by optimal prey size rather than species. Mountain lions prey on foals in areas with relatively high mule deer densities, suggesting deer presence may increase foal vulnerability. We hypothesize that lions select foals when available, potentially reducing pressure on mule deer and/or supporting larger lion populations than would occur without this additional prey source. Although individual-level data on mountain lions are challenging to obtain, such information could help managers identify individuals for removal or conservation, improving predator-management outcomes in mixed-prey systems.

Nevada↗

Effects of mountain lion predation on reducing feral horse population growth rates: Panacea or pipedream?

A goal of applied ecology is to evaluate how demographic rates contribute to population growth and how demography might be manipulated to achieve management objectives. In western North America, many feral horse ( Equus caballus ) populations occupying public lands are protected by federal law and managed for site-specific numerical targets. However, feral horses can exhibit population growth rates exceeding 20% per yr, which can lead to overpopulation, and therefore conflict with other permitted land uses. In response, some stakeholder groups have advocated for natural solutions to the problem of rapid growth and overabundance. Mountain lion ( Puma concolor ) predation has been hypothesized to have suppressive effects on horse population growth rates under some conditions. Here, we evaluated the degree to which this phenomenon might reduce feral horse growth rates using elasticity analysis, scenario analysis with simulations, and an empirical state-space model for a horse population in southeastern Nevada subject to chronic predation. Age-specific elasticities revealed that annual population growth rates (λ) were more sensitive to perturbations in foal and yearling survival rates than for older age-classes. This finding, in conjunction with empirical measures indicating that foals comprised approximately 60% of horses killed by mountain lions, suggests that predation may have greater potential to reduce horse population growth rates than previously recognized. Scenario analysis predicted that horse populations could decrease to target levels within 10 years if predation reduced: (1) annual foal survival by 80% each year, or (2) annual survival rates of foals, yearlings, and 2-year olds by >60%. The state-space model indicated that the heavily predated Nevada horse population experienced positive population growth during 2022 and 2023 (λ = 1.07, both years). Using information on known predation-caused mortalities from 2020–2021, our model predicted that population growth rate in the absence of predation (‘predicted λ’) would have been approximately twice as high (predicted λ 2020 = 1.14; predicted λ 2021 = 1.14 in 2021). Taken together, our results suggest that predation is unlikely to singularly induce stable or negative population growth of feral horses. That said, our findings suggest two aspects of predation that may benefit resource managers. First, chronic predation may reduce λ, thereby increasing the time required for populations to either recover from declines, or exceed management objectives; and second, predation may be most effective in achieving management objectives for horse populations when combined with other interventions, such as removals or fertility control treatments.

Nevada↗

Captivity may broadly impede bison ecological function: Space, season, and management

American bison ( Bos bison ) were spared from numerical extinction but considered to be ecologically extinct, partially due to spatial restrictions in their former range. A key component of the ecological function of bison is their ability to adjust their spatial behaviors at multiple scales to match the seasonal distributions and availability of resources. To understand how management influences the amount and seasonality of space bison use at various scales, we estimated home range using autocorrelated kernel density estimators (95% utilization distribution) and foraging patch size by the maximum variance in first-passage time at four temporal scales (annual, growing, nongrowing, and focal seasons) for two free-ranging and three captive bison herds. The seasonal differences in space-use within management regimes and study areas were treated as nonparametric related measures while differences amongst management regimes and study areas were treated as nonparametric independent measures. Seasonal variations in space-use were detected in both management regimes, but only free-range bison depicted this pattern at the larger home range scale (p < 0.001). Free-range bison had significantly larger home ranges across seasons compared to captive bison (p < 0.001), but captive bison had larger foraging patch sizes during the growing season than free-range bison. Study areas with captive bison did not differ in their amount of space-use at any scale or season (p > 0.05). The strongest differences were apparent among study herds in annual home range size (p < 0.001) and growing season foraging patch size (p < 0.001). Our results demonstrate that captivity likely prevents bison from using their available landscape seasonally at broad scales, which could have ecological consequences for this historically nomadic herbivore. Although sociopolitical realities prevent bison restoration at a continental scale, increasing the amount of space available to bison where possible has the potential to replicate previous ecological processes. Further research can evaluate the influence of local environmental conditions on seasonality of bison space-use and can assess effects of scale on the ecological impacts of bison.

Colorado, Montana, Texas, Utah↗