Review and development of best practices for toxicity tests with dreissenid mussels

Diane L. Waller; Sherri Pucherelli; Matthew T. Barbour; Samantha Tank; Matthew J. Meulemans; Jeremy K. Wise; Angelique Dahlberg; David C. Aldridge; Renata Claudi; W. Gregory Cope; Patricia L. Gillis; Donna Kashian; Denise A. Mayer; Kelly A. Stockton-Fiti; Wai Hing Wong

doi:10.1002/etc.5648

USGS · 70247419

Review and development of best practices for toxicity tests with dreissenid mussels

Diane L. Waller·Sherri Pucherelli·Matthew T. Barbour·Samantha Tank·Matthew J. Meulemans·Jeremy K. Wise·Angelique Dahlberg·David C. Aldridge·Renata Claudi·W. Gregory Cope·Patricia L. Gillis·Donna Kashian·Denise A. Mayer·Kelly A. Stockton-Fiti·Wai Hing Wong

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Since their introduction to North America in the 1980s, research to develop effective control tools for invasive mussels ( Dreissena polymorpha and D. rostriformis bugensis ) has been ongoing across various research institutions using a range of testing methods. Inconsistencies in experimental methods and reporting present challenges for comparing data, repeating experiments, and applying results. The Invasive Mussel Collaborative established the Toxicity Testing Work Group (TTWG) in 2019 to identify “best practices” and guide development of a standard framework for dreissenid mussel toxicity testing protocols. We reviewed the literature related to laboratory-based dreissenid mussel toxicity tests and determined the degree to which standard guidelines have been used and their applicability to dreissenid mussel testing. We extracted detailed methodology from 99 studies from the peer-reviewed and gray literature and conducted a separate analysis for studies using presettlement and postsettlement mussels. We identified specific components of methods and approaches that could be refined or standardized for dreissenid mussels. These components included species identification, collection methods, size/age class distinction, maintenance practices, testing criteria, sample size, response measures, reporting parameters, exposure methods, and mortality criteria. We consulted experts in the field of aquatic toxicology and dreissenid mussel biology on our proposed. The final recommendations contained in the present review are based on published standard guidelines, methods reported in the published and gray literature, and the expertise of TTWG members and an external panel. In addition, our review identifies research needs for dreissenid mussel testing including improved methods for early–life stage testing, comparative data on life stages and between dreissenid mussel species, inclusion of a reference toxicant, and additional testing of nontarget species (i.e., other aquatic organisms). Environ Toxicol Chem 2023;42:1649–1666. © 2023 His Majesty the King in Right of Canada. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of SETAC. Reproduced with the permission of the Minister of Environment and Climate Change Canada. This article has been contributed to by U.S. Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.

Explore related subjects

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Diane L. Waller, Sherri Pucherelli, Matthew T. Barbour, Samantha Tank, Matthew J. Meulemans, Jeremy K. Wise, Angelique Dahlberg, David C. Aldridge, Renata Claudi, W. Gregory Cope, Patricia L. Gillis, Donna Kashian, Denise A. Mayer, Kelly A. Stockton-Fiti, Wai Hing Wong. 2023-05-16. Review and development of best practices for toxicity tests with dreissenid mussels. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5648

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Using organic compounds and salt mixtures to investigate potential mechanisms of major ion toxicity to the mayfly Neocloeon triangulifer

Field assessments and laboratory studies have demonstrated that mayflies (Ephemeroptera) are relatively sensitive to increased concentrations of major geochemical ions (Na + , Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , K + , Cl − , SO 4 2− , HCO 3 − /CO 3 2- ), but much remains to be learned about potential mechanisms of toxicity. In the present study, we sought to determine whether solution osmolarity is sufficient to predict the toxic effects of major ions to a mayfly, Neocloeon triangulifer . We further investigated whether binary mixtures of major ion salts with common cations or common anions provide evidence of concentration addition or independent action, potentially illuminating toxicity drivers for this species. Finally, we sought to determine if there are mechanisms for major ion toxicity to mayflies that are comparable to those for other species. The toxicity of single salts showed a Ca-dependent correlation with the total component concentration (the sum of individual ion concentrations, a close correlate of osmolarity), but the effect concentrations were well below those causing toxicity from mannitol (presumed to have only an osmotic effect), suggesting that a general osmotic effect is not responsible for major ion toxicity in this species. The mixture experiments consistently indicated additive toxicity and consistency with the relationship to total component concentration, which supports a single toxic mechanism and thus no evidence for ion-specific mechanisms, as reported for other species. Given the lack of evidence of ion-specific toxicity, the total component metric is likely useful for a broad range of ionic compositions.

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry↗

USGS2026

Accumulation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) and their association with immune parameters in nestling ospreys (Pandion haliaetus) from Chesapeake and Delaware Bays, USA

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a class of widespread, environmentally persistent compounds that pose a potential threat to wildlife and human health. Despite recent efforts to reduce the use of long-chain PFAS in industrial practices and commercial/consumer products, the persistence and solubility of PFAS have led to their detection in wildlife on a global scale. Osprey ( Pandion haliaetus ) have long been used as a sentinel species with an extensive history of serving as an effective bioindicator of contamination. Here we report on a large-scale evaluation of PFAS and potential health effects in osprey from the Chesapeake and Delaware Bays, USA. In 2011 and 2015, we collected plasma samples from osprey nestlings throughout the Chesapeake and Delaware Bay watersheds. We quantified 40 PFAS congeners in osprey plasma via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and analyzed plasma for indicators of immune and thyroid function, and plasma biochemistry. In all birds, perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) was the most commonly detected PFAS, followed by perfluoroundecanoic acid, (PFUnA) and perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA). In nestling plasma from Chesapeake Bay, PFOS tended to be a higher average contributor to PFAS profiles compared to samples from Delaware Bay. In contrast, long-chain perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids (PFCAs) such as PFUnA and PFDA comprised larger percentages of total PFAS in osprey plasma from Delaware Bay relative to Chesapeake Bay. While some PFAS concentrations were associated with plasma health indicators, the proportion of variation explained was low. Overall, our study provides a more thorough understanding of PFAS presence in the Chesapeake and Delaware Bays and is one of the first to examine whether PFAS exposure is associated with adverse health effects in wildlife.

Chesapeake and Delaware Bays↗

USGS2025

A critical perspective on the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry’s adherence to founding principles—Opportunities for the future

The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) is a global organization whose mission is the advancement of environmental science and the promotion of science-informed decision making. On SETAC’s 45th anniversary, the following question was raised: Are the 1979 founding principles of SETAC, multidisciplinary approaches to solving environmental problems, multisector engagement and scientific objectivity, still relevant to the fulfillment of its mission? In a special session held at the 45th Annual Meeting in Fort Worth, Texas, U.S., a critical evaluation of the founding principles was initiated by reviewing SETAC’s history and ongoing activities, and recommendations were made for the future. With few exceptions, participants appreciated SETAC’s purposeful efforts to approach challenging environmental issues through multisector balance, an approach that is unique amongst scientific societies. We recognized that scientists have biases and views of what they find important, regardless of employing organization, and that objectivity is best served by being aware of these biases and views. SETAC’s founding principles have stood the test of time and continue to provide a strong foundation for the Society’s mission, and with a few suggested improvements, will continue to be instrumental in guiding environmental science, stewardship and policy into the future. The significance of SETAC’s contribution of robust science grounded in reliable evidence and data was recognized as being especially crucial at this time of triple planetary crisis (climate change, pollution and biodiversity loss), compounded by rapid technological developments and geopolitical issues.

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry↗