USGS Science⌕ Search
Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70244047

Appendix 1: Analytical methods and errors

T. H. Druitt·L. Edwards·R. M. Mellors·D. M. Pyle·R.S.J. Sparks·Marvin A. Lanphere·M. Davies·B. Barreirio
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Thirty eight K-Ar and eight 40Ar/39Ar high-precision age determinations were made at the US Geological Survey, Menlo Park, on a total of 22 rocks from the entire volcanic field. Duplicate or triplicate determinations were carried out on 14 samples in order to improve analytical precision. All ages were measured on whole-rock samples selected after thin-section examination. Most of the samples meet the usual criteria for whole-rock dating (Mankinen © Dal-rymple 1972), but some contain minor amounts of glass and a few samples are very glassy. The samples selected for dating were crushed to 0.5-lmm (-18 to +35 mesh). For K-Ar dating aliquots weighing c. 25 g were used for the Ar measurements. A 10 g aliquot was ground to -200 mesh and splits of the powder were used for K20 measurements, which were made in duplicate on each of two separate splits of sample powder by flame photometry after lithium metaborate fusion and dissolution (Ingamells 1970). Ar analyses were by isotope-dilution mass spectrometry using a high-purity (>99.9%) 38Ar tracer and techniques and equipment described previously (Dalrymple & Lanphere 1969). All samples for Ar extraction were baked overnight at 280°C. Mass analyses were done on a 22.68 cm radius, multiple-collector mass spectrometer with a nominal 90° sector magnet, using automated data collection (Stacey etal 1981). Errors given for the calculated K-Ar ages of individual measurements are estimates of the standard deviation of analytical precision. The errors were calculated using formulae derived by Cox & Dalrymple (1967) and Dalrymple & Lanphere (1969).

Explore related subjects

Geological Society, London, MemoirsArticle

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T. H. Druitt, L. Edwards, R. M. Mellors, D. M. Pyle, R.S.J. Sparks, Marvin A. Lanphere, M. Davies, B. Barreirio. 1999-12-09. Appendix 1: Analytical methods and errors. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsl.mem.1999.019.01.09

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2016

Submarine glacial landforms on the Bay of Fundy–northern Gulf of Maine continental shelf

The Bay of Fundy–northern Gulf of Maine region surrounds the southern part of Nova Scotia, encompassing, from west to east, the Bay of Fundy, Grand Manan Basin, German Bank, Browns Bank, Northeast Channel and northeastern Georges Bank (Fig. 1a, b). During the last glacial maximum ( c. 24–20 14 C ka BP), the SE margin of the Laurentide Ice Sheet (LIS) occupied the study area, the rest of the Gulf of Maine and the continental Scotian Shelf off Atlantic Canada (see Dyke et al. 2002 , fig. 1; Shaw et al. 2006 , fig. 8; Hundert & Piper 2008 , fig. 16). Early mapping of the glaciated region on the Scotian Shelf using side-scan sonar imagery and seismic-reflection profiles revealed topographic features interpreted to be recessional moraines indicative of retreat of the LIS ( King et al. 1972 ; King 1996 ). Subsequently, multibeam sonar seafloor mapping of local-scale glacial landforms on the inner Scotian Shelf off Halifax, Nova Scotia (Fig. 1b) provided further information on the dynamics of the advance and retreat of the ice sheet ( Loncarevic et al. 1994 ). Interpretation of seismic-reflection profiles across Georges Bank revealed that the surficial sediment is a veneer of glacial debris transported to Georges Bank by the LIS during the late Pleistocene from continental areas to the north ( Shepard et al. 1934 ; Knott & Hoskins 1968 ; Schlee 1973 ; Twichell et al. 1987 ; Fader et al. 1988 ). Recent high-resolution multibeam sonar surveys of German Bank and the Bay of Fundy mapped a complex of ice-advance and ice-retreat features attributed to the activity of the LIS ( Todd et al. 2007 ; Todd & Shaw 2012 ).

Geological Society, London, Memoirs↗
USGS2016

Pockmarks in Passamaquoddy Bay, New Brunswick, Canada

Pockmarks are seafloor depressions associated with fluid escape ( Judd & Hovland 2007 ). They proliferate in the muddy seafloors of coastal Gulf of Maine and Bay of Fundy, where they are associated with shallow natural gas likely of biogenic origin ( Ussler et al. 2003 ; Rogers et al. 2006 ; Wildish et al. 2008 ). In North America, shallow-water pockmark fields are not reported south of Long Island Sound, despite the abundance of gassy, muddy estuaries. The absence of pockmarks south of the limit of North American glaciation suggests that local and regional heterogeneities, possibly related to glacial or sea-level history or bedrock geology, influence pockmark field distribution. In shallow-water embayments, such as Passamaquoddy Bay, New Brunswick, pockmarks can be large (>200 m diameter) and number in the thousands.

New Brunswick↗
USGS2011

Chapter 50 Geology and tectonic development of the Amerasia and Canada Basins, Arctic Ocean

Amerasia Basin is the product of two phases of counterclockwise rotational opening about a pole in the lower Mackenzie Valley of NW Canada. Phase 1 opening brought ocean–continent transition crust (serpentinized peridotite?) to near the seafloor of the proto-Amerasia Basin, created detachment on the Eskimo Lakes Fault Zone of the Canadian Arctic margin and thinned the continental crust between the fault zone and the proto-Amerasia Basin to the west, beginning about 195 Ma and ending prior to perhaps about 160 Ma. The symmetry of the proto-Amerasia Basin was disrupted by clockwise rotation of the Chukchi Microcontinent into the basin from an original position along the Eurasia margin about a pole near 72°N, 165 W about 145.5–140 Ma. Phase 2 opening enlarged the proto-Amerasia Basin by intrusion of mid-ocean ridge basalt along its axis between about 131 and 127.5 Ma. Following intrusion of the Phase 2 crust an oceanic volcanic plateau, the Alpha–Mendeleev Ridge LIP (large igneous province), was extruded over the northern Amerasia Basin from about 127 to 89–75 Ma. Emplacement of the LIP halved the area of the Amerasia Basin, and the area lying south of the LIP became the Canada Basin.

Geological Society, London, Memoirs↗