USGS Science⌕ Search

USGS · 70238533

East Molokai and other Kea-trend volcanoes: Magmatic processes and sources as they migrate away from the Hawaiian hot spot

Abstract

[1] There are geochemical differences between shield lavas from the two parallel trends, Kea and Loa, defined by young Hawaiian volcanoes. The shield of East Molokai volcano, at greater than 1.5 Ma, is the oldest volcano on the Kea trend. Sequences of older tholeiitic to younger alkalic basalt that erupted as this volcano evolved from the shield to postshield stage of volcanism are well exposed. Much younger, ∼0.34–0.57 Ma, alkalic basalt and basanite erupted during rejuvenated stage volcanism. Like rejuvenated stage lavas erupted at other Hawaiian volcanoes, rejuvenated stage East Molokai lavas have relatively low 87 Sr/ 86 Sr and high 143 Nd/ 144 Nd. Such ratios reflect a source component with a long-term depletion in abundance of incompatible elements. On the basis of positive correlations of 87 Sr/ 86 Sr versus 206 Pb/ 204 Pb and negative correlations of these isotopic ratios with Nb/Zr, a smaller proportion of this depleted component also contributed to the late shield/postshield lavas erupted at East Molokai and the other Kea-trend volcanoes, Haleakala and Mauna Kea. At each of these Kea-trend volcanoes, as the volcano moved away from the hot spot, the extent of melting and magma supply from the mantle decreased, the depth of melt segregation increased, and there was an increasing role for a component with long-term relative depletion in incompatible elements. This depleted component has Kea-trend Pb isotopic characteristics and relatively low 208 Pb/ 204 Pb at a given 206 Pb/ 204 Pb, and it is probably not related to oceanic lithosphere or the source of mid-ocean ridge basalt. The overlap in Sr, Nd, and Pb isotope ratios of recent Kilauea shield lavas and 550 ka Mauna Kea shield lavas has been used to argue that Kea-trend shield volcanism samples a vertically continuous, geochemically distinct stripe which persisted in the hot spot source for 550 kyr (Eisele et al., 2003; Abouchami et al., 2005). As Kea-trend volcanoes migrate away from the hot spot and evolve from the shield to postshield stage, there are systematic changes in Sr, Nd, and Pb isotope ratios. However, the overlap of Sr, Nd, and Pb isotope ratios in late shield/postshield lavas from Mauna Kea (<350 ka) and East Molokai (∼1.5 Ma) show that the periphery of the hot spot sampled by Kea-trend postshield lavas also had long-term geochemical homogeneity.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 21.043246546437842° to 21.220016668973187° latitude; -157.06832717329596° to -156.70577834517096° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Guanping Xu, Frederick A. Frey, David A. Clague, Dominique Weis, Melvin H. Beeson. 2005-05-28. East Molokai and other Kea-trend volcanoes: Magmatic processes and sources as they migrate away from the Hawaiian hot spot. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gc000830

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Erupted volume during the 2014–2023 Semisopochnoi unrest and eruption constrained by multi-platform InSAR and volcanic gas observations

Volcano deformation data provide important constraints on magma dynamics during volcanic unrest and eruptions. From these observations, we can estimate subsurface pressure changes and relate them to volume change in the reservoir. However, because magma and rock are compressible, this volume change cannot be directly equated with eruptive volume. When we combine geodetic analyses with gas observations, petrologic constraints, volatile solubility modeling, and magma compressibility equations, however, we can estimate realistic lower and upper bounds of eruptive volume. Leveraging multi‐platform InSAR time series and satellite SO 2 data, we apply these methods to the 2014–2023 unrest and eruption of Semisopochnoi, Alaska. We find that this phreatomagmatic eruption sequence was fed by a spherical magma source at 6.5–7.5 km depth bsl, centered beneath the caldera, ∼5 km offset to the east from the vent. Volatile solubility modeling indicates that ∼50% of the initial dissolved CO 2 has exsolved at depths consistent with the geodetic source depth, increasing the magma compressibility. Combining geodetic model constraints with SO 2 observations, petrologic constraints, solubility models, and magma compressibility findings yields 12–32 Mm 3 as the most‐likely juvenile, dense‐rock equivalent eruptive volume, with a best estimate of 20 Mm 3 . Stress change modeling suggests that the local stress field encouraged conduit formation west of the pre‐eruptive inflation center, and that the 2014 M7.9 Rat Island earthquake, ∼65 km to the west of Semisopochnoi, reduced the compressive stress underneath the volcano, supporting prolonged eruptive activity.

Alaska↗

Pre-eruptive volatiles and magma storage depth for the 2018 eruption at Mount Veniaminof, Alaska

Mount Veniaminof is a frequently active, open-system arc volcano on the Alaska Peninsula, part of the Alaska-Aleutian arc. Mount Veniaminof's September–December 2018 eruption began with small lava flows and culminated in a larger explosive event in November that produced a 450 km long continuous ash plume—one of the volcano's most significant ash-producing events in recently observed eruptions. A temporally constrained tephra record was sampled after the eruption. We present volatile element concentrations (H, C, S, Cl, F) from a total of 65 olivine-hosted melt inclusions (MIs) across six tephra layers to assess potential variations in magma chemistry throughout the course of the eruption. No variation is observed in volatile concentrations across the tephra layers, and there is no correlation between volatile concentrations and the explosivity of eruptive pulses leading to the November explosive event. H 2 O concentrations within MI suggest moderately hydrous magmas up to 2.4 wt% H 2 O and a large range in CO 2 concentrations in the MI (14–2,180 ppm) from Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry and vapor bubble reconstructions. H 2 O and CO 2 measurements correspond to entrapment pressures up to 400 MPa (entrapment depths ∼15 km), but with modal storage around 100–200 MPa. H 2 O contents can be reconciled with previous microlite number density estimates using a polybaric storage history.

Alaska↗

Hydrothermal manganese-oxide mineralization of a carbonate ooze, Samoan hotspot region, South Pacific Ocean

Low-temperature hydrothermal manganese oxides occur throughout the global oceans. However, the hydrothermal replacement of a carbonate ooze by manganese oxides is described here for the first time. The 24 samples dredged from three locations around the Territory of American Samoa in the South Pacific Ocean include six samples with remnant carbonate and volcaniclastic sediments, which we refer to as “low Mn,” and 18 samples in which the mineralization is pervasive and has replaced most original sediment, termed “high Mn.” The 18 high-Mn samples exhibit a mean Mn content of 51 wt.%. Higher Li and Mn contents and lower Fe contents in the high-Mn samples indicate a hydrothermal origin and distinguish these samples from hydrogenetic ferromanganese crusts. Mn-oxide layers are up to 90 mm thick, some with columns to 44 mm long and 10 mm wide, the magnitude of which has not been described previously. Samples are composed of birnessite and 10 Å phyllomanganate minerals. Textures of the thickest Mn layers indicate mineralization below the seabed from ascending fluids during multiple hydrothermal pulses. Mineralization took place by complete to partial replacement and cementation of foraminiferal sediments intermixed with volcaniclastic sediments in varying amounts. Our results highlight the production of carbonate sediment-hosted hydrothermal Mn oxides from multiple hydrothermal sources within the Samoan volcanic chain. The potential extensive distribution on the regional scale of this newly described mineralization process and unique element enrichments raise questions about its broader distribution globally and potential importance to hydrothermal processes, element mass balance, and seabed mineral resources.

Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems↗