Influence of anthropogenic subsidies on movements of common ravens

Adam E. Duerr; Peter H. Bloom; Kerry Ross; Tricia A. Miller; Melissa A. Braham; Amy L Fesnock; Todd E. Katzner

doi:10.15142/whgt-5q40

Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70232409

Influence of anthropogenic subsidies on movements of common ravens

Adam E. Duerr·Peter H. Bloom·Kerry Ross·Tricia A. Miller·Melissa A. Braham·Amy L Fesnock·Todd E. Katzner

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Anthropogenic subsidies can benefit populations of generalist predators such as common ravens (ravens; Corvus corax ), which in turn may depress populations of many types of species at lower-trophic levels, including desert tortoises (Gopherus agassizii ) or greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus). Management of subsidized ravens often has targeted local breeding populations that are presumed to affect species of concern and ignored “urban” populations of ravens. However, little is known about how ravens move, especially in response to the presence of anthropogenic subsidies. Therefore, subsidized ravens from distant populations that are not managed may influence local prey. To better understand this issue, we deployed global positioning system – global system for mobile communications transmitters to track movements of 19 ravens from September to December 2020 relative to 2 land cover types that provide subsidies: developed areas and cultivated crops. On average, ravens moved 41.5 km (±30.5) per day, although daily movement distances ranged from 0.13– 206.1 km. Raven movement among cover types during the non-breeding season varied widely, with 100% of individuals each using land cover types that provide subsidy and other types at least once in the season. On 100% of days ravens used areas that did not provide subsidy, on 86.7% of days they used developed areas, and on 20.5% of days they used cultivated crops. Although on some days a raven would stay exclusively in areas that did not provide subsidy, there were no days in which a single raven ever stayed exclusively in developed or cultivated crops. Ravens moved shorter distances on days when they used subsidies more frequently. Further, time spent in developed areas and cultivated crops increased when ravens roosted closer to them, although this effect was greater for developed areas than for cultivated crops. Individual ravens were not associated exclusively with either of the subsidy-providing landscapes we considered, but instead all birds used both subsidized and other landscapes. Our research suggests that management of ravens during the non-breeding season and possibly during the breeding season, intended to reduce risk of predation on desert tortoises, will be most effective if conducted on a broad scale because of distances the birds travel and the lack of separation between putative “urban” and “natural” populations of ravens.

Explore related subjects

Human-Wildlife Interactions Article

Source-reported bounding extent: 32.62087018318113° to 35.496456056584165° latitude; -119.4873046875° to -114.2138671875° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Adam E. Duerr, Peter H. Bloom, Kerry Ross, Tricia A. Miller, Melissa A. Braham, Amy L Fesnock, Todd E. Katzner. 2022. Influence of anthropogenic subsidies on movements of common ravens. https://doi.org/10.15142/whgt-5q40

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2024

Dust management at an active construction area impacts monarch distribution

The North American population of monarch butterflies ( Danaus plexippus) is experiencing dramatic declines, necessitating investigations into challenges facing this species that can be resolved through management actions. For instance, dust made airborne by heavy equipment driving along a dirt road can settle on roadside vegetation, resulting in reduced use by monarchs. Dust accumulation on areas where floral nectaries such as leaves, stems, and flowers may be present could reduce the ability of pollinators, such as monarchs, to access nectar from flowering plants needed during migration. One such challenge was observed on Poplar Island, an island restoration project located in the Maryland portion of the Chesapeake Bay, USA. To determine if road watering would result in notable reductions of dust accumulation on adjacent roadside vegetation, and if such a reduction in dust would affect monarch use of treated habitat, water was applied via spraying to sections of the roadway during the 2022 fall migration period. Treatment areas where water was applied to the road were found to have significant reductions in dust accumulation ( P ≤0.001) as well as significantly higher use by monarchs ( P = 0.002), relative to non-watered control areas. While these results indicate potential utility of road watering to support monarchs at sites with high dust accumulation, numerous additional elements such as water usage and logistical constraints must also be considered. While limited in scope, these data do provide a notable proof-of-concept for managing this issue at other sites and can be built upon with further research.

Maryland↗

USGS2023

Pilot study for invasive brown treesnake baiting in residential areas

The nocturnal brown treesnake ( Boiga irregularis ; BTS) was accidentally introduced to the island of Guam, USA, in the Western Pacific in 1945. The BTS has spread throughout all terrestrial habitats, causing wildlife loss and economic damage. Several tools and techniques have been developed to locally reduce BTS numbers and prevent their spread to other islands. The common analgesic acetaminophen has been registered as a low-risk pesticide to manage BTS in non-residential areas. Prior to a more intensive toxic baiting campaign on Andersen Air Force Base, Guam, as part of a larger study to evaluate the effects of BTS control on native bird survival, we conducted a pilot study from May 18 to October 6, 2020, to assess the efficacy and safety of BTS baiting within a residential area. We administered large and small domesticated mouse ( Mus musculus ) and bird chick ( Coturnix japonica and Gallus domesticus ) nontoxic carrion baits (without acetaminophen) in bait stations to evaluate BTS and nontarget bait take rates, bait preferences, movements following nighttime bait uptakes, and interactions of humans and domestic animals with baits. We monitored baits with cameras and implanted them with radio-transmitters to verify the species taking the bait and to track BTS to their daytime sheltering locations. Successful BTS bait take rates were low at 20 of 482 baits (4.1%), as were nontarget bait take rates (4 baits; 0.8%). No preference among bait types was discernible, though power to detect differences was limited due to low overall uptake. All first daytime refugia were within vegetation except for 1 location on the roof of a house. No evidence of bait removal or human tampering was found at any of the bait stations. Based on our pilot study, there appeared to be little human or nontarget risk from acetaminophen baiting in this relatively uniform and sparsely vegetated residential area. Because most of the residential areas on Guam are much more variable, similar assessments within a broader diversity of residential areas may be advisable before promoting large-scale use of acetaminophen for managing BTS in close contact with human habitations.

Human-Wildlife Interactions↗

USGS2023

Sea-ice conditions predict polar bear land use around military installations in Alaska

Polar bears ( Ursus maritimus ) are threatened by sea-ice loss due to climate change, which is concurrently opening the Arctic to natural resource extraction and a broader scope of national security responsibilities. Mitigating the risk of human–bear conflicts is an emerging challenge as many polar bears spend longer ice-free summers on land where they have limited access to food and come into more frequent contact with people. We investigated a suite of physical and ecological variables that influence the timing of polar bear arrival on, and departure from, land using remote-sensing data on sea-ice extent and satellite telemetry data from 72 radio-collared adult female polar bears from 1986 to 2015. Analyses encompassed the coastline of the Southern Beaufort Sea north of Alaska, USA, and focused on zones within a 35-km radius (mean daily travel distance of a polar bear) of 5 military installations. Sea ice in the Southern Beaufort Sea retreated approximately 1 month earlier in spring, and reformed 1 month later in fall, in 2015 compared to 1979. In generalized linear mixed models, the most important predictors of polar bear arrival and departure were the dates of sea-ice breakup and formation, respectively, in localized marine areas surrounding each military zone. Region-wide sea-ice conditions also influenced land use, although to a lesser extent. We found that polar bears spent longer periods on land in the military zones compared to outside the zones, which may reflect increased land use in areas with human activity and potential attractants (noting that some military installations were in proximity to other human settlements). Our results demonstrate that the timing of polar bear land use in northern Alaska is influenced by sea-ice conditions on multiple spatial scales. This information can be used to predict and manage the presence of polar bears around military installations and other places of interest.

Alaska↗