Vulnerability of avian populations to renewable energy production

Tara Conkling; Hannah B. Vander Zanden; Taber D Allison; Jay E. Diffendorfer; Thomas V Dietsch; A. Duerr; Amy L Fesnock; Rebecca R. Hernandez; S. R. Loss; David M. Nelson; Peter M. Sanzenbacher; Julie L. Yee; Todd E. Katzner

doi:10.1098/rsos.211558

USGS · 70230691

Vulnerability of avian populations to renewable energy production

Tara Conkling·Hannah B. Vander Zanden·Taber D Allison·Jay E. Diffendorfer·Thomas V Dietsch·A. Duerr·Amy L Fesnock·Rebecca R. Hernandez·S. R. Loss·David M. Nelson·Peter M. Sanzenbacher·Julie L. Yee·Todd E. Katzner

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Renewable energy production can kill individual birds, but little is known about how it affects avian populations. We assessed the vulnerability of populations for 23 priority bird species killed at wind and solar facilities in California, USA. Bayesian hierarchical models suggested that 48% of these species were vulnerable to population-level effects from added fatalities caused by renewables and other sources. Effects of renewables extended far beyond the location of energy production to impact bird populations in distant regions across continental migration networks. Populations of species associated with grasslands where turbines were located were most vulnerable to wind. Populations of nocturnal migrant species were most vulnerable to solar, despite not typically being associated with deserts where the solar facilities we evaluated were located. Our findings indicate that addressing declines of North American bird populations requires consideration of the effects of renewables and other anthropogenic threats on both nearby and distant populations of vulnerable species.

Explore related subjects

Royal Society Open Science Article

Source-reported bounding extent: 32.534156° to 42.009247° latitude; -124.409591° to -114.134768° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Tara Conkling, Hannah B. Vander Zanden, Taber D Allison, Jay E. Diffendorfer, Thomas V Dietsch, A. Duerr, Amy L Fesnock, Rebecca R. Hernandez, S. R. Loss, David M. Nelson, Peter M. Sanzenbacher, Julie L. Yee, Todd E. Katzner. 2022-03-30. Vulnerability of avian populations to renewable energy production. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.211558

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Fish locomotor dynamics quantified using multiple inertial measurement units

Animals exhibit a diversity of locomotor behaviours that vary with body shape, ontogeny, motivation and environment. Documenting these behaviours often relies on recording videos of animals in controlled conditions displaying stereotyped behaviours. By contrast, animal-borne motion sensing data loggers can document diverse behaviours of animals in their natural environment. Traditionally, one data logger is used to infer body dynamics; however, a single location presents an incomplete picture of body movement. Here, we deploy multiple independent inertial measurement units on individual fish to study within-body dynamics and assess the accuracy of this approach compared to traditional video methods. Using a combination of robotic and animal experiments, we accurately measure the timing, direction and magnitude of movement of multiple locations along the body and can recreate accurate three-dimensional midline kinematics without video data. Furthermore, we show that with as few as two data loggers, parameters such as propulsive wavelength can be calculated, even during high-intensity behaviours. Using multiple data loggers has the potential to provide unbiased spatio-temporal estimates of fish kinematics, allowing kinematic studies to be extended to new species, new habitats and a diversity of natural fish locomotor behaviours beyond those traditionally studied in laboratory settings.

Royal Society Open Science↗

USGS2026

Evaluating interactive effects of the Conservation Reserve Program and wind energy infrastructure on grassland bird abundance in the United States

The extent of grasslands has contracted globally, leading to significant declines in grassland-obligate species, including birds. Grassland birds are threatened by multiple factors, including grassland conversion to cropland, and development, including energy infrastructure. In the USA, the federal Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) provides financial incentives for agricultural landowners to convert marginal cropland to vegetative covers, including grassland, making it a key approach to recovering grasslands. However, given the high percentage of wind turbines near Conservation Reserve Program land, it is critical to determine if wind energy and the Conservation Reserve Program interact to affect grassland birds. We used generalized additive models and community science eBird data to assess the interactive effects of wind and the Conservation Reserve Program on the abundances of 27 grassland-obligate bird species across their breeding ranges in the continental US. We found associations between bird relative abundances and interactions involving wind and Conservation Reserve Program variables, suggesting that wind energy development near Conservation Reserve Program fields could dampen the benefits of the Conservation Reserve Program for some species. These results indicate that decisions about where to install wind energy infrastructure that incorporate information about the presence of Conservation Reserve Program land may reduce the adverse effects of wind energy on grassland birds. This study provides information that can help maximize the benefits of the Conservation Reserve Program while allowing for environmentally friendly development of renewable energy.

contiguous United States↗

USGS2026

Small cumulative survival costs of enzootic disease could suppress long-term population size

Fungal pathogens can cause epizootics that result in widespread mortality and rapid population declines in some species. However, even in the absence of high disease-induced mortality, enzootic mycoses could have large-scale impacts on host population dynamics. Here, we examined the effects of ophidiomycosis, an enzootic fungal disease, on a Louisiana snake community over a 3-year period using a multi-state Jolly–Seber model with disease-state misclassification. We did not detect a difference between the average weekly apparent survival probability of uninfected and infected hosts for either Nerodia species or Thamnophis proximus . We also found a strong positive association between snout-to-vent length and weekly apparent survival probability across all species. We found that recruitment of infected hosts was slightly higher than recruitment of uninfected hosts for two of the three species. Population projections suggested divergent trajectories between disease-present and disease-absent scenarios, where disease-absent populations had higher abundance than disease-present populations. Our results highlight that small differences in survival can accumulate over time, as well as the challenges of quantifying population-level impacts of enzootic diseases when survival differences are not readily detected, underscoring the importance of continued long-term monitoring to assess whether ophidiomycosis affects snake population dynamics.

Louisiana↗