USGS Science⌕ Search

USGS · 70223459

A food web modeling assessment of Asian Carp impacts in the Middle and Upper Mississippi River, USA

Abstract

The invasion of non-native fishes has caused a great detriment to many of our native fishes. Since the introduction of invasive carps, such as Silver, Bighead, Common and Grass Carp , managers and researcher have been struggling to remove these species while also hypothesizing the detriment of further invasion. This study developed a food web model of four locations on the Mississippi River and used those models to assess the impacts of two scenarios: carp removal and carp invasion. In the Middle Mississippi River where these invasive carps are already present, the models found that it would take a sustained exploitation of up to 30% of initial biomass over an extended period to remove Grass Carp and up to 90% removal of initial biomass to remove Silver and Bighead Carp. In the locations where Silver, Bighead, and Grass Carp are not yet established (i.e., Pools 4,8, and 13) the invasion of these species could cause declines from 10 to 30% in initial biomass of native fishes as well as already established nonnative invasive species.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 37.09900294387622° to 44.414654778606874° latitude; -92.03659057617188° to -89.35455322265625° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nicholas W. Kramer, Quinton E. Phelps, Clay Pierce, Michael E. Colvin. 2019. A food web modeling assessment of Asian Carp impacts in the Middle and Upper Mississippi River, USA. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fooweb.2019.e00120

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Effects of temperature on ectothermic predators are modulated by warming-induced changes to prey

Global temperature increases can fundamentally alter ecosystems through myriad pathways including by impacting top predators, whose movement, behavior, and trophic interactions often shape the structure of food webs and associated ecosystem processes. Forecasting how ectothermic predators will respond to climate change currently relies heavily on quantifying the direct impacts of temperature on their physiology and performance. However, prey resources are also likely to shift with warming, but less is known about how changes in ecosystem productivity may interact with rising temperatures to influence ectothermic predators. Understanding such interactions can thus help refine predictions for how these consumers will respond to a dynamic future and may clarify recent findings that some cold-water species are buffered and even benefit from warming temperatures despite elevated metabolic costs. Here, we capitalize on a growing body of literature linking temperature increases to changes in invertebrate prey assemblages to describe how these drivers interact to influence the performance (e.g., body size and growth rate) of a globally distributed ectothermic predator in freshwater ecosystems. We disentangled these drivers with a novel approach that blends conceptual synthesis and a mechanistic drift foraging-bioenergetics model developed for Oncorhynchus mykiss (rainbow trout). Overall, we found that warming-induced changes to invertebrate prey assemblage size structure, production, or both, can strongly reshape thermal performance curves describing how rainbow trout respond to temperature. Notably, we found that shifts towards larger-bodied prey or higher prey production increased trout performance across a gradient of temperatures. Additionally, our results show that these shifts in prey also increased the temperature that optimizes fish growth. Our findings underscore the critical role that prey resources may play in either buffering or amplifying future risks of warming and can help improve future conservation and management of ectothermic animals, including cold-water fish, in a warmer and rapidly changing world.

Food Webs↗

Can spatial food web subsidies associated with river hydrology and lateral connectivity be detected using stable isotopes?

During and following lateral connections, aquatic organisms residing in the river channel may assimilate material from sources imported from oxbows, and oxbow residents may consume and assimilate material imported from the channel. Hydrology, lateral connectivity, and stable isotope ratios of fishes and mussels were analyzed for evidence of spatial food web subsidies between the active channel and oxbow lakes in the floodplain of the Guadalupe River, Texas. During surveys conducted between March 2016 and April 2017, fish, mussel, periphyton, seston, and riparian plant samples were collected in and around two oxbows and adjacent channel sites for analysis of stable isotope ratios. Biplots of δ 13 C and δ 15 N were graphed for basal sources and specimens of six common fish species, four sunfish species ( Lepomis spp. combined), and two mussel species (Unionidae combined) captured from oxbows and the channel. Within each graph, polygons were drawn to indicate the space occupied by animals that could have assimilated feasible combinations of source materials originating from either oxbows or the river channel. Based on positions of animals within source polygons, riparian C4 grasses were not an important source of organic matter supporting biomass of fishes and mussels within the channel or oxbows. Overall, 84% of organisms had isotopic signatures consistent with assimilation of in situ sources, but also 76% of all organisms were inconclusive with regards to cross-habitat exchanges. Outliers that may have assimilated ex situ source material were observed for only 4% of 313 organisms from oxbows and 9% of 232 organisms from the channel, and some but not all of these cases followed high flow pulses that connected oxbows for extended periods. Several issues that compromise inferences from stable isotope analysis were identified, and estimation of spatial food web subsidies in fluvial systems could be enhanced by analyzing additional biomarkers, such as isotopic ratios of other elements and compound-specific stable isotopes, as well as additional sources, time-specific biotracers, and experimental approaches that directly track movement of sources and organisms in spatially structured food webs.

Texas↗

Invasive Brook Stickleback Culaea inconstans minimally alters the trophic ecology of four native fishes in Wyoming, USA

Invasive species introductions are a primary threat facing populations of native freshwater fishes. There are multiple mechanisms by which an invader can affect native species, with competition for food resources being one mechanism that can lead to declines in the distribution and abundance of native species. Invaders that are trophic generalists may cause shifts in the trophic ecology of native species and may be better suited for long-term persistence amid environmental stochasticity. Therefore, trophic studies can provide valuable information on the risk an invader poses to native species. Brook Stickleback Culaea inconstans is an invasive fish species in Wyoming whose effect on native fish assemblages is poorly understood. Our goal was to understand the potential for competitive interactions between Brook Stickleback and native fishes. We used stable isotopes of carbon (ẟ 13 C) and nitrogen (ẟ 15 N) to evaluate the feeding ecology of Brook Stickleback relative to four native fishes, and to explore whether native fish isotopic niches changed in sympatry with Brook Stickleback. We hypothesized that the isotopic niche of Brook Stickleback would be larger than that of native fishes, suggesting broader resource use. Additionally, we hypothesized that the isotopic niche of native fish populations sympatric with Brook Stickleback would contract. We did not find support for our hypotheses as the isotopic niche of Brook Stickleback was not substantially different from that of native fishes. Further, the isotopic niche of native fishes was not substantially affected by Brook Stickleback presence. As a result, we do not currently see evidence of Brook Stickleback altering the trophic ecology of native fish species. Our results provide insight to the effects of a small-bodied invasive fish species on native fishes in a previously unstudied region, and can help managers prioritize management actions to conserve native fishes.

Wyoming↗