USGS ScienceSearch

USGS · 70221317

Time and space relationships of the taconic allochthon and autochthon

Abstract

The Taconic rock sequence extends from near Sudbury, Vermont, to near Poughkeepsie, New York, a length of about 150 miles; and from just west of the Green Mountain Range and Berkshire Highlands to the valleys of the Hudson River and Lake Champlain, a width of about 20 miles. The Taconic rocks are now in the axial region of the Middlebury synclinorium and its southward extension. The Taconic sequence consists of about 2000 feet of slate, with subsidiary graywacke, quartzite, and limestone; many of the rock units are turbidites. Fossils from the rocks include forms of Early, Middle, and Late Cambrian and Early and Middle Ordovician age. Evidence of stratigraphic tops derived from the fossils and from primary sedimentary features agrees with structural data and demonstrates that the Taconic rocks are geometrically the highest strata within the Middlebury synclinorium. The underlying rocks of the synclinorium (the synclinorium sequence) are right side up; they also range in age from Early Cambrian to Middle Ordovician but belong to a different sedimentary lithofacies (dominantly carbonate and orthoquartzite). The relation between the Taconic sequence and the synclinorium sequence, therefore, is a baffling problem. Lithostratigraphically, the Taconic sequence falls into three groups: (1) the pre- Normanskill "low Taconic " sequence, occurring in the area between the main Taconic Range and the Hudson River, as far south as Rhinebeck, New York; (2) the Normanskill Shale in the same area, as well as in the area south of Rhinebeck at least as far as Poughkeepsie, New York, and also west of the Hudson River; and (3) the "high Taconic " sequence, occupying the main Taconic Range from Dorset Mountain, Vermont, south to Indian Mountain in Sharon, Connecticut, as well as Mount Greylock in Massachusetts. Rocks of (1) and (2) are fossiliferous, but to date no fossil has been found in (3). Rocks of (1) and that part of (2) areally coextensive with (1) thus are of known age but uncertain three-dimensional geometric configuration, whereas rocks of (3) are of known configuration (in the centers of open synclinoria) but unknown age. Only that part of (2) beyond the areal confines of (1) is both of known age and known configuration; these rocks are in sedimentary contact above the older rocks of the synclinorium sequence and are autochthonous. At the north end of the Taconic sequence in western Vermont, rocks of group (1) are beyond reasonable doubt allochthonous. Because of the southward geometric continuity of the structural elements, all the Taconic rocks of group (1), and that part of group (2) areally coextensive with it, are interpreted as allochthonous. The structure of group (3), the high Taconic sequence, is inferred by topography and by detailed lithostratigraphic matching with rocks of the east Vermont sequence; on this basis, as well as on the basis of the broad lithic similarity with rocks of group (1), rocks of group (3) are concluded to be also allochthonous. A discontinuous polymict conglomerate underlies and surrounds the allochthon on all sides and is interpreted here as a record that dates the imminent arrival of the allochthon at each locality. The conglomerate contains unsorted blocks of rocks of both the Taconic sequence and the synclinorium sequence; the matrix is the autochthonous upper Normanskill Shale or its equivalent. Fossils from the matrix shale date the event as Trenton, probably Sherman Fall in age. The geologic history of the area is reconstructed as follows: The pre-Normanskill Taconic rocks were deposited in the area of the present Precambrian massifs of the Green Mountains-Berkshire Highlands belt between the clastic, eugeosynclinal east Vermont sequence to the east and the miogeosynclinal synclinorium sequence to the west; they constitute the transitional facies between these two belts. Conditions were relatively stable until early Middle Ordovician time , when the Green Mountain- Berkshire Highlands area began to rise and the area of the present Middlebury synclinorium began to subside. Subsidence took place largely by a series of high-angle longitudinal faults that, as a whole, step down to the west. Argillaceous sediments (the Normanskill Shale) began to inundate the former miogeosynclinal area; because the conditions of sedimentation had become similar, the sediments resembled, in facies, the synchronous Taconic rocks that were being deposited to the east. Continued rise of the Green Mountains-Berkshire Highlands area led in middle Trenton time to the decollement of the Cambrian and Ordovician sediments into the area of the present Middlebury synclinorium in a series of giant submarine slides. Sedimentation continued at the receiving site throughout the event; sedimentation may also have persisted on the moving slides. The record is found today in the turbidite-laden shale and graywacke in the upper part of the Normanskill Shale of both the allochthon and the autochthon . Restoration of the allochthonous rocks to the original site of deposition leads to correlations between rocks of the Taconic sequence and of the largely autochthonous east Vermont sequence. The lithic correlation can be carried to the level of individual formations and is confirmed by a few known ages in the east Vermont sequence. Several lines of reasoning lead to a plausible correlation of part of the Cavendish Formation of southeastern Vermont with the oldest part of the Taconic sequence. This correlation leads further to the conclusion that in this area the contacts between the Green Mountain massif and the Cavendish Formation and between the Cavendish and the overlying east Vermont sequence must both be thrust faults of large displacements. This conclusion is in fact inevitable because one of the Taconic thrust slices that extends without interruption between the latitudes corresponding to the gap in the Precambrian massifs has been shown by local structural evidence to be allochthonous; an outside original depositional site must be found for it. The present Taconic allochthon is coextensive with an area of marked negative Bouguer gravity anomaly; the Green Mountains-Berkshire massifs constitute a belt of positive anomaly. It is here proposed that these anomalies resulted from a deepseated transfer of material; subcrustal addition of material caused the rise of the Green Mountains-Berkshire Highlands area, and the concurrent subtraction of material caused subsidence in the Middlebury synclinorium area through a series of faults which were the near-surface expression of an episode of crustal collapse. If this interpretation is correct, then the regional gravity anomaly represents an uncompensated feature that has persisted since Middle Ordovician time .

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

E. Zen. 1967-01-01. Time and space relationships of the taconic allochthon and autochthon. https://doi.org/10.1130/spe97-p1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

The Maryland Coastal Plain Aquifer Information System: A GIS-based tool for assessing groundwater resources

Groundwater is the source of drinking water for ∼1.4 million people in the Coastal Plain Province of Maryland (USA). In addition, groundwater is essential for commercial, industrial, and agricultural uses. Approximately 0.757 × 109 L d –1 (200 million gallons/d) were withdrawn in 2010. As a result of decades of withdrawals from the coastal plain confined aquifers, groundwater levels have declined by as much as 70 m (230 ft) from estimated prepumping levels. Other issues posing challenges to long-term groundwater sustainability include degraded water quality from both man-made and natural sources, reduced stream base flow, land subsidence, and changing recharge patterns (drought) caused by climate change. In Maryland, groundwater supply is managed primarily by the Maryland Department of the Environment, which seeks to balance reasonable use of the resource with long-term sustainability. The chief goal of groundwater management in Maryland is to ensure safe and adequate supplies for all current and future users through the implementation of appropriate usage, planning, and conservation policies. To assist in that effort, the geographic information system (GIS)–based Maryland Coastal Plain Aquifer Information System was developed as a tool to help water managers access and visualize groundwater data for use in the evaluation of groundwater allocation and use permits. The system, contained within an ESRI ArcMap desktop environment, includes both interpreted and basic data for 16 aquifers and 14 confining units. Data map layers include aquifer and ­confining unit layer surfaces, aquifer extents, borehole information, hydraulic properties, time-series groundwater-level data, well records, and geophysical and lithologic logs. The aquifer and confining unit layer surfaces were generated specifically for the GIS system. The system also contains select groundwater-quality data and map layers that quantify groundwater and surface-water withdrawals. The aquifer information system can serve as a pre- and postprocessing environment for groundwater-flow models for use in water-supply planning, development, and management. The system also can be expanded to include features that evaluate constraints to groundwater development, such as insufficient available drawdown, degraded groundwater quality, insufficient aquifer yields, and well-field interference. Ultimately, the aquifer information system is intended to function as an interactive Web-based utility that provides a broad array of information related to groundwater resources in Maryland’s coastal plain to a wide-ranging audience, including well drillers, consultants, academia, and the general public.

Special Paper of the Geological Society of America

The 2011 Mineral, Virginia, earthquake and its significance for seismic hazards in eastern North America: overview and synthesis

The 23 August 2011 M w (moment magnitude) 5.7 ± 0.1, Mineral, Virginia, earthquake was the largest and most damaging in the central and eastern United States since the 1886 M w 6.8–7.0, Charleston, South Carolina, earthquake. Seismic data indicate that the earthquake rupture occurred on a southeast-dipping reverse fault and consisted of three subevents that progressed northeastward and updip. U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) "Did You Feel It?" intensity reports from across the eastern United States and southeastern Canada, rockfalls triggered at distances to 245 km, and regional groundwater-level changes are all consistent with efficient propagation of high-frequency seismic waves (∼1 Hz and higher) in eastern North America due to low attenuation. Reported damage included cracked or shifted foundations and broken walls or chimneys, notably in unreinforced masonry, and indicated intensities up to VIII in the epicentral area based on USGS "Did You Feel It?" reports. The earthquake triggered the first automatic shutdown of a U.S. nuclear power plant, located ∼23 km northeast of the main shock epicenter. Although shaking exceeded the plant's design basis earthquake, the actual damage to safety-related structures, systems, and components was superficial. Damage to relatively tall masonry structures 130 km to the northeast in Washington, D.C., was consistent with source directivity, soft-soil ground-motion amplification, and anisotropic wave propagation with lower attenuation parallel to the northeast-trending Appalachian tectonic fabric. The earthquake and aftershocks occurred in crystalline rocks within Paleozoic thrust sheets of the Chopawamsic terrane. The main shock and majority of aftershocks delineated the newly named Quail fault zone in the subsurface, and shallow aftershocks defined outlying faults. The earthquake induced minor liquefaction sand boils, but notably there was no evidence of a surface fault rupture. Recurrence intervals, and evidence for larger earthquakes in the Quaternary in this area, remain important unknowns. This event, along with similar events during historical time, is a reminder that earthquakes of similar or larger magnitude pose a real hazard in eastern North America.

Virginia

Aftershocks illuminate the 2011 Mineral, Virginia, earthquake causative fault zone and nearby active faults

Deployment of temporary seismic stations after the 2011 Mineral, Virginia (USA), earthquake produced a well-recorded aftershock sequence. The majority of aftershocks are in a tabular cluster that delineates the previously unknown Quail fault zone. Quail fault zone aftershocks range from ~3 to 8 km in depth and are in a 1-km-thick zone striking ~036&deg; and dipping ~50&deg;SE, consistent with a 028&deg;, 50&deg;SE main-shock nodal plane having mostly reverse slip. This cluster extends ~10 km along strike. The Quail fault zone projects to the surface in gneiss of the Ordovician Chopawamsic Formation just southeast of the Ordovician&ndash;Silurian Ellisville Granodiorite pluton tail. The following three clusters of shallow (<3 km) aftershocks illuminate other faults. (1) An elongate cluster of early aftershocks, ~10 km east of the Quail fault zone, extends 8 km from Fredericks Hall, strikes ~035&deg;&ndash;039&deg;, and appears to be roughly vertical. The Fredericks Hall fault may be a strand or splay of the older Lakeside fault zone, which to the south spans a width of several kilometers. (2) A cluster of later aftershocks ~3 km northeast of Cuckoo delineates a fault near the eastern contact of the Ordovician Quantico Formation. (3) An elongate cluster of late aftershocks ~1 km northwest of the Quail fault zone aftershock cluster delineates the northwest fault (described herein), which is temporally distinct, dips more steeply, and has a more northeastward strike. Some aftershock-illuminated faults coincide with preexisting units or structures evident from radiometric anomalies, suggesting tectonic inheritance or reactivation.

Virginia