Geology of the Mayagüez area, Puerto Rico

Peter H. Mattson

doi:10.1130/0016-7606(1960)71[319:gotmap]2.0.co;2

Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70220580

Geology of the Mayagüez area, Puerto Rico

Peter H. Mattson

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Mayagüez area forms the southwestern corner of Puerto Rico , west of 67° W. and south of 18° 15' N. One-third of the 640 square kms is covered by thick alluvium. Unconformities separate a basal complex, two sequences of highly folded igneous and sedimentary rocks, and a younger sequence of gently dipping sedimentary rock. The basal Bermeja complex contains serpentinite, silicified porphyritic volcanic rock with some sedimentary rock, and minor spilite, amphibolitized spilite, and amphibolite. It is exposed chiefly in some anticlinal cores in southwestern Puerto Rico . Limestone, mudstone, andesite, and basalt form the older folded sequence. The Río Loco formation, bronzite andesite porphyry in part with pillow structures, was extruded perhaps in the Cenomanian. The Mayagüez group includes most of the rocks in southwestern Puerto Rico : the Yauco mudstone, Parguera limestone, Brujo limestone, Melones limestone, Maricao basalt, Sabana Grande andesite, and El Rayo volcanic rocks. The maximum possible age range is Turonian to Maestrichtian. The group ranges in thickness from about 800 m in the south to 3800 m in the north, and it varies in lithology from limestone in the south to mudstone and volcanic rock in the north, indicating a volcanic center to the north during that time. The second folded sequence contains andesitic volcanic rock, bedded tuff, and massive limestone. The San Germán formation (Maestrichtian) includes andesite, the Cabo Rojo agglomerate member, and the Cotui limestone member. The Jicara formation, massive limestone and bedded tuff, is Paleocene; there is one exposure of an unnamed ? Eocene marl. Post-Eocene limestone and conglomerate are also exposed in the area . The structure of the basement complex is obscured by its massiveness and by the cover of younger rocks. Two major deformations have affected the rocks of southwestern Puerto Rico since Cenomanian to Santonian time. In the Maestrichtian, the first of these formed folds with a N. 60° W. trend, asymmetric or overturned to the south. Near the south coast the folding of thin Mayagüez group rocks was probably influenced by trends in the Bermeja complex which caused deviations in the regional trends and also some overturning to the north. The San Germán formation, deposited unconformably on the eroded surface of the folded Mayagüez group, contains large allochthonous blocks of older and contemporaneous rocks. These blocks, up to 2 km by 1 km in exposure, were deposited by slumping or sliding due to gravity within and at the base and top of the San Germán formation near Lajas and San Germán. Most rocks in the blocks are extremely contorted and contain deformed Foraminifera. The San Germán and Jicara formations and perhaps the ?Eocene marls were deformed into gentle open folds trending east in the area covered by this report. Oligocene, Miocene, and younger sedimentary rocks have been tilted and uplifted. Large east-west left-lateral transcurrent faults cross the area , offsetting and offset by two sets of transverse faults (N. 45° E., N. 20° W.): most faults are probably Maestrichtian to Oligocene, although minor faulting has continued to the present. Dikes and sills of quartz diorite porphyry and mica-quartz dacite porphyry intrude the ?Maestrichtian San Germán formation and older units. A diorite plug cuts the Bermeja complex, and a granodiorite plug intrudes the Mayagüez group.

Explore related subjects

Bulletin of the Geological Society of America Article

Source-reported bounding extent: 17.832374329567518° to 18.58377568837094° latitude; -67.52197265625° to -65.302734375° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Peter H. Mattson. 1960. Geology of the Mayagüez area, Puerto Rico. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1960)71%5B319%3Agotmap%5D2.0.co%3B2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2010

Uncertainties in slip-rate estimates for the Mission Creek strand of the southern San Andreas fault at Biskra Palms Oasis, southern California

This study focuses on uncertainties in estimates of the geologic slip rate along the Mission Creek strand of the southern San Andreas fault where it offsets an alluvial fan (T2) at Biskra Palms Oasis in southern California. We provide new estimates of the amount of fault offset of the T2 fan based on trench excavations and new cosmogenic 10 Be age determinations from the tops of 12 boulders on the fan surface. We present three alternative fan offset models: a minimum, a maximum, and a preferred offset of 660 m, 980 m, and 770 m, respectively. We assign an age of between 45 and 54 ka to the T2 fan from the 10 Be data, which is significantly older than previously reported but is consistent with both the degree of soil development associated with this surface, and with ages from U-series geochronology on pedogenic carbonate from T2, described in a companion paper by Fletcher et al. (this volume). These new constraints suggest a range of slip rates between ∼12 and 22 mm/yr with a preferred estimate of ∼14–17 mm/yr for the Mission Creek strand of the southern San Andreas fault. Previous studies suggested that the geologic and geodetic slip-rate estimates at Biskra Palms differed. We find, however, that considerable uncertainty affects both the geologic and geodetic slip-rate estimates, such that if a real discrepancy between these rates exists for the southern San Andreas fault at Biskra Palms, it cannot be demonstrated with available data.

California↗

USGS1995

Stratigraphic and structural synthesis of a Miocene extensional terrane, southeast California and west-central Arizona

Detailed stratigraphy and isotopic dating of stratigraphic sections in the Colorado River extensional corridor support a regional correlation of highly faulted Tertiary stratigraphic sequences and provide a chronologic framework for interpreting the evolution of low-angle normal (detachment) faults. On the basis of this correlation, we define six tilting domains in the upper plate of the Whipple, Chemehuevi, and Rawhide detachment faults and identify three discrete episodes of detachment faulting that began in the early Miocene and ended in middle Miocene time. Episodes of rapid detachment faulting are indicated by extreme tilting of upper-plate fault blocks and overlying Miocene sequences, fanning dips of basinal deposits, and angular unconformities that represent short time gaps in the accumulation of syntectonic sequences. During the first episode of detachment faulting at about 20 Ma, the upper plate segmented to form the domains. Basin subsidence and extreme tilting of upper-plate fault blocks and syntectonic deposits characterized the eastern Topock, Crossman, Aubrey, Parker Dam, and Buckskin-Rawhide domains, whereas the western Mopah domain was the site of abundant volcanic activity but no basins or tilting. A second episode of extension at about 18 Ma produced extreme tilts in the Buckskin-Rawhide domain but upper-plate blocks in the Mopah domain tilted moderately. A third regionwide faulting episode between 14 and 12 Ma was due to localized uplift of middle and lower crust and eventual exposure of the detachment faults and their footwalls. The upper-plate fault blocks responded passively to localized slip on the detachment faults. Rapid extension began on the Whipple-Chemehuevi detachment fault at 20 Ma and had shifted southward to the Buckskin-Rawhide detachment fault by 18 Ma; volcanic activity also shifted southward to the Buckskin-Rawhide domain at this time. The southward shift of rapid extension and volcanism probably represents buildup and release of strain at localized sites in the lower plate. Otherwise, stratigraphic and structural relations indicate that the locations of upper-plate basins, faulting and tilting of upper-plate blocks, and position of the breakaway zone remained stable throughout the major phases of extension.

Arizona, California↗

USGS1971

Basin and range structure: A system of horsts and grabens produced by deep-seated extension

Basin and Range structure can be interpreted as a system of horsts and grabens produced by the fragmentation of a crustal slab above a plastically extending substratum. According to this view, the extension of the substratum causes the basal part of the slab to be pulled apart along narrow, systematically spaced zones which in turn cause the downdropping of complex horizontal prisms (grabens) in the brittle upper crust. The grabens form valleys at the surface; the intervening areas are horsts, or tilted horsts. Not all geologists have agreed, however, that Basin and Range structure consists of a system of horsts and grabens. Instead, the structure is commonly considered to consist of tilted blocks in which the upslope part of an individual block forms a mountain and the downslope part a valley. Recent detailed studies, including geophysical work, suggest that the horst and graben model may be more generally applicable. Many of the valleys in the Great Basin are bounded on both sides by faults that drop the valley block down; these faults are exposed at the surface or can be inferred from steep gravity gradients indicative of steep faulted subsurface bedrock slopes. Some areas that were thought to represent a typical series of tilted blocks may be a series of highly asymmetrical grabens in which one side of a valley is marked by a master fault and the other side by valleyward tilt. With present knowledge, most, or perhaps all, of the major valleys in the Great Basin can plausibly be considered to be grabens, and most or all of the mountains can be considered to be horsts or tilted horsts. The grabens, and the underlying inferred deep zones of extension that cause them, are systematically distributed in the Great Basin. They are generally north-trending features spaced 15 to 20 mi apart. Locally, the pattern is more complex, and individual grabens divide and trend away from each other at acute or high angles. In a few places, the pattern may even be roughly polygonal. The distribution pattern of the grabens and the related deep zones of extension resemble crack patterns in small-scale tensional systems, and both patterns may be mechanically related. By analogy with the small-scale systems, the areas of generally north-trending and parallel grabens require east-west extension, whereas the areas with a possible polygonal pattern of grabens must extend radially. The geometry of block faulting related to Basin and Range structure requires sizable east-west extension, estimated at about 1.5 mi on the average for each major valley and at about 30 to 60 mi across the entire Great Basin. Most of this extension has taken place in the last 17 m.y., or perhaps even in the last 7 to 11 m.y., indicating a rate of extension in the range of 0.3 to 1.5 cm/yr.

Arizona, California, Idaho, Nevada, Oregon, Utah↗