Mammal species composition and habitat associations in a commercial forest and mixed-plantation landscape

Wai Pak Ng; Frank T. van Manen; Stuart P. Sharp; Siew Te Wong; Shyamala Ratnayeke

doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119163

Home/Archive/USGS

USGS · 70219422

Mammal species composition and habitat associations in a commercial forest and mixed-plantation landscape

Wai Pak Ng·Frank T. van Manen·Stuart P. Sharp·Siew Te Wong·Shyamala Ratnayeke

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Commercial forest plantations of fast-growing species have been established globally to meet increasing demands for timber, pulpwood, and other wood products. Industrial plantations may contribute to tropical forest conservation by reducing exploitation of primary and secondary natural forests. Whether such plantations can support critical elements of biodiversity, including provision of habitat and movement corridors for species of conservation concern, is an important question in Southeast Asia. Our objectives were to investigate relationships between habitat gradients and community attributes of medium-sized to large mammals in a mixed plantation mosaic in Bengkoka Peninsula, Sabah, East Malaysia. Data on mammals were collected using 59 remote camera stations deployed for a minimum of 21 days (24-hour sampling occasions) in three major land-use types: natural forest, Acacia plantations, and non- Acacia plantations (oil palm, rubber, young Eucalyptus pellita ). We used sample-based rarefaction to evaluate variation in species richness with land use. We used generalized linear models and ordination analyses to evaluate whether variation in mammal detections and species composition was associated with habitat gradients. We recorded >22 mammal species over 1572 sampling occasions. Natural forest area was positively associated with mammal species richness and detections of threatened mammals. Overall detections of mammals increased with decreasing elevation, but decreased within, and close to, Acacia plantations. Detections of threatened mammals increased with greater proportions of natural forest and Acacia and increasing proximity to roads. Sample-based rarefaction indicated that species richness of mammals in Acacia and natural forest was considerably higher than observed. Both natural forest and Acacia plantations shared similar values for species richness and diversity, but non- Acacia plantations scored lower in both metrics. Mammal species composition differed among different types of land use. Smaller generalists used non- Acacia plantation forests. A variety of other mammals including some threatened species used natural forest, Acacia , or a combination of the two. Acacia plantations possess attributes supporting a diversity of mammal species, including those we defined as threatened based on IUCN criteria. However, this is likely a function of the habitat mosaic with natural forest in the study area and the mangrove forests on the fringes of the peninsula serving as refuges of mammal diversity. Retention and restoration of natural and mangrove forests may therefore enhance the conservation potential of industrial Acacia plantations. Additionally, controlled road access in conjunction with anti-poaching operations and strengthening public awareness are essential to reduce the threat of overexploitation.

Explore related subjects

Forest Ecology and Management Article

Source-reported bounding extent: 0.77313° to 6.92805° latitude; 100.08576° to 119.1819° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Wai Pak Ng, Frank T. van Manen, Stuart P. Sharp, Siew Te Wong, Shyamala Ratnayeke. 2021. Mammal species composition and habitat associations in a commercial forest and mixed-plantation landscape. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119163

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

USGS2026

Drought resistance is greater in montane conifers compared to coastal conifers in northern California

Frequent and intense droughts are rapidly altering stand dynamics in western North American forests. The ecological and geographical diversity of northern California provides a unique opportunity to measure these responses across species, habitat types, and levels of competitive pressure. This study used dendrochronological techniques and linear mixed-effects models to assess growth responses to drought in four montane and two coastal conifer species across 54 study sites (nine sites per species, 526 trees total) in northern California. Montane species included Abies magnifica var. shastensis , Picea breweriana , Pinus lambertiana , and Pinus monticola ; coastal species included Picea sitchensis and Tsuga heterophylla . Growth was evaluated from 2002 to 2018 and the drought period was from 2013 to 2015. There were significant differences among species and environments (coastal vs montane) in growth, drought resistance and resilience, and annual latewood proportion. Growth in montane species was generally positively related to moisture availability (Palmer Drought Severity Index) and negatively related to tree competition. The four montane species maintained relatively stable drought resistance, resilience, and latewood proportion across the study period. In contrast, growth in the two coastal species was influenced more by tree size and crown ratio than moisture availability or competition. As the 2013–2015 drought proceeded, coastal species showed marked reductions in drought resistance and resilience and increases in latewood proportion. Across the six conifer species, mean reductions in growth during and after the drought were generally less than 20% and never exceeded 40%. Compared to montane species, the lower resistance measured in coastal species suggests greater risk for increased stress and mortality in the event of more severe, prolonged, and/or frequent droughts.

California↗

USGS2026

Quantifying post-fire live tree presence and spatial variation using Sentinel-2 time series

Accurate mapping of post-fire surviving trees is important for tracking forest recovery and prioritizing land management decisions. Satellite-based remote sensing is an effective method to assess post-fire forest conditions. Traditionally, differenced satellite-derived burn severity indices are computed by differencing one year pre- and post-fire spectral reflectance values. Differenced burn severity indices are useful for quantifying and mapping the magnitude of ecological change, but their application to detecting and mapping post-fire live trees may not be as appropriate, particularly for delayed tree mortality. Delayed tree mortality (“delayed mortality”) is a phenomenon where trees that initially survive fire then die over an extended period (between one and five years), and it can be challenging to measure and predict. In this study, we demonstrate the potential of mapping delayed mortality using readily available remotely sensed imagery alone. We used random forest models to detect post-fire live trees using 10-m resolution Sentinel-2 data at one-, three-, and five-years post-fire for four fires in the southern Sierra Nevada, California, USA. Using imagery from the National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP; 60-cm resolution), we manually classified live tree presence in 6000 Sentinel-2 pixels (500 pixels for each fire-year combination) to calibrate and validate models. Sentinel-2 based model accuracies ranged from 65 % to 86 % with F-scores ranging from 0.52 to 0.86, and their predictions of live pixel area were on average 44 % lower than inferred from more traditional indices such as relative differenced normalized burn ratio (RdNBR). This work represents a promising first step in using freely available post-fire spectral reflectance imagery to detect live trees over an extended period to support post-fire management.

California↗

USGS2026

Evaluating evidence of changing regional occupancy of four bat species in response to forest management practices

Coordinated, regional strategies to guide effective management and conservation of forests can be used to balance conservation with management for other objectives such as timber, scenic viewsheds, and fire. A key part of these regional strategies is incorporating knowledge of how management actions may affect certain species, especially those that are sensitive or are of concern. However, knowledge of how management actions may affect species is inferred from studies conducted across small areas where the species’ behavior and forest conditions are easily assessed. Here, we examine how occupancy of four bat species responds to forest management across the eastern United States at regional scales. We used range-wide capture and stationary acoustic surveys from the North American Bat Monitoring Program from 2010 to 2020 to estimate yearly summer occupancy for four bat species of conservation concern identified in the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service (USFS) Southern and Eastern Regions Bat Conservation Strategy: little brown bat ( Myotis lucifugus ), northern long-eared bat ( Myotis septentrionalis ), Indiana bat ( Myotis sodalis ), and tricolored bat ( Perimyotis subflavus ), and assessed the degree to which occupancy of each species changed after different vegetation management actions were implemented on USFS lands. We identified 78 different management actions that were hypothesized to influence summer bat occupancy at two spatial scales (5-km and 10-km) across the eastern United States from the Forest Service Activity Tracking System and grouped these management actions into four vegetation management types: clear-cutting, fire, thinning, and ground vegetation management. To evaluate potential effects of these vegetation management types on bat occupancy, we created a yearly management metric representing the average number of years that had passed since any one of the included management actions in each management type had been implemented in each 5-km or 10-km grid cell, weighted by the proportion of the grid cell covered by the management treatment history. We chose these metrics to ask if more management or management done recently had a larger effect on bat occupancy than less management or management done long-ago. We then fit Bayesian hierarchical multi-scale occupancy models for each species to assess how occupancy changed in response to the amount and time since implementation of each vegetation management type. Using the estimated relationships between the yearly metrics of management and bat occupancy, we created predictions for how bat occupancy responded at 1- and 5- years after implementation. We found substantial differences in the response of the four species to the four vegetation management types. Ground vegetation management provided the greatest increase in expected occupancy at 1 year after implementation for little brown bat, long-eared bat, and tricolored bat, while fire provided the greatest increase in expected occupancy for Indiana bat. Thinning provided increases for all species at 1 year after implementation, but even greater increases at 5 years after implementation. Clear-cutting, on the other hand, tended to result in decreased occupancy at both 1- and 5-years after implementation for each species and had the greatest effect on tricolored bat at 1 year after implementation. Clear evidence for how management types like these may be affecting bat populations can be used at regional scales to help private and public forest managers achieve their strategic goals.

eastern United States↗