USGS Science⌕ Search

USGS · 70215264

Application of a regional climate model to assess changes in the climatology of the Eastern US and Cuba associated with historic landcover change

Abstract

We examine the annual, seasonal, monthly, and diurnal climate responses to the land use change (LUC) in eastern United States and Cuba during four epochs (1650, 1850, 1920, and 1992) with ensemble simulations conducted with the RegCM4 regional climate model that includes the Biosphere Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS1e) surface physics package (Dickinson et al., 1993). We derived the land use (LU) data sets by harmonizing a previous reconstruction (Steyaert & Knox, 2008) with updated observations and modeled potential vegetation. The eight‐member ensembles for each epoch were driven with randomly perturbed 1990–2002 atmospheric boundary conditions derived from the National Center for Environmental Prediction global reanalysis. LUC induces statistically significant climate responses across all epochs; the largest changes occur between 1850 and 1920 with the widespread conversion of forests in the United States and forests, grassland, and woody wetlands in Cuba to agriculture. The atmospheric feedback from the aggregated grid‐cell responses attributed to physical and biophysical parameters in BATS1e alters the circulation in the lower atmosphere, thereby propagating the LUC regionally. Depending on the season and location, the altered circulation reinforces, attenuates, or has little effect on surface responses. Relative to pre‐settlement (1650), the 1992 LU produces colder mean annual air temperature (−0.09 ± 0.16 °C) and increased precipitation (0.08 ± 0.09 mm day −1 ) over the United States, warmer (0.08 °C) and wetter (0.03 mm day −1 ) conditions over Florida, and warming (0.32 °C) and drying (−0.03 mm day −1 ) over Cuba, indicating that LUC has played a varying role in climate change over the region.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 19.476950206488414° to 41.96765920367816° latitude; -95.625° to -73.740234375° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Steven W. Hostetler, R Reker, Jay R. Alder, Thomas Loveland, Debra A. Willard, Christopher E. Bernhardt, Eric T. Sundquist, Renee L. Thompson. 2019-11-17. Application of a regional climate model to assess changes in the climatology of the Eastern US and Cuba associated with historic landcover change. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019jd030965

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Quantifying methane emissions from a rich fen with uncrewed aircraft systems in boreal Alaska

Thawing of permafrost in northern latitudes is accelerating, potentially releasing substantial amounts of methane (CH 4 ) as forested permafrost plateaus transition into wetlands. This ecosystem shift alters the carbon exchange between the soil and atmosphere, influencing the permafrost-carbon feedback. Monitoring these changes may require measurement platforms operating across varied spatial and temporal scales. Recent advancements in small uncrewed aircraft systems (sUAS) enable high resolution CH 4 flux quantification in remote, complex terrains; however, comparisons with established methods such as eddy covariance flux towers remain limited. We used a hexacopter sUAS to quantify CH 4 emissions from the Alaska Peatland Experiment, a wetland within the Bonanza Creek Experimental Forest. Using an ensemble of methods to define the background CH 4 concentration, along with near surface emissions from soil chambers, helped constrain our flux estimates. The sUAS method yielded an average flux of 0.0077 ± 0.0019 mol s −1 CH 4 , within a factor of two concurrent tower-derived total source flux estimates (0.0036 ± 0.00042 mol s −1 CH 4 ). To assess spatial drivers of observed fluxes, we conducted a 2D footprint analysis and overlaid the results with high-resolution hyperspectral land cover classification, quantifying vegetative contributions within each footprint. This revealed higher fen representation in sUAS measurements (73.8%) than in tower footprints (58.8%), and lower tussock meadow representation (15.6% and 30.3%, respectively). These differences were consistent with known variation in vegetation-specific CH 4 emissions. Our results highlight that combining footprint modeling with land cover characterization can enhance interpretations of CH 4 fluxes and guide cross-platform comparisons.

JGR Atmospheres↗

Light absorbing particles deposited to snow cover across the Upper Colorado River Basin, Colorado Rocky Mountains, 2013-16: Interannual variations from multiple natural and anthropogenic sources

Atmospheric particulate matter (PM) as light-absorbing particles (LAPs) deposited to snow cover can result in early onset and rapid snow melting, challenging management of downstream water resources. We identified LAPs in 38 snow samples (water years 2013–2016) from the mountainous Upper Colorado River basin by comparing among laboratory-measured spectral reflectance, chemical, physical, and magnetic properties. Dust sample reflectance, averaged over the wavelength range of 0.35–2.50 μm, varied by a factor of 1.9 (range, 0.2300–0.4444) and was suppressed mainly by three components: (a) carbonaceous matter measured as total organic carbon (1.6–22.5 wt. %) including inferred black carbon, natural organic matter, and carbon-based synthetic, black road-tire-wear particles, (b) dark rock and mineral particles, indicated by amounts of magnetite (0.11–0.37 wt. %) as their proxy, and (c) ferric oxide minerals identified by reflectance spectroscopy and magnetic properties. Fundamental compositional differences were associated with different iron oxide groups defined by dominant hematite, goethite, or magnetite. These differences in iron oxide mineralogy are attributed to temporally varying source-area contributions implying strong interannual changes in regional source behavior, dust-storm frequency, and (or) transport tracks. Observations of dust-storm activity in the western U.S. and particle-size averages for all samples (median, 25 μm) indicated that regional dust from deserts dominated mineral-dust masses. Fugitive contaminants, nevertheless, contributed important amounts of LAPs from many types of anthropogenic sources.

Colorado↗

The role of the Great Plains low‐level jet in moisture transport, streamflow, and flooding in the Missouri River Basin

The Missouri River Basin, one of the primary agricultural regions in North America, is prone to large hydroclimatic variability and extreme events. The Great Plains low‐level jet (GPLLJ) is one of the major sources of moisture transport into this region, and concerns over moisture extremes already seen in the interior U.S. have been linked to changes in GPLLJ. However, the relationship between GPLLJ and precipitation in this region remains uncertain, with studies showing conflicting results that may be related to distinct types of jet events. Here, we use daily GPLLJ data to study connections between different types of jet events and precipitation, integrated water vapor transport, and synoptic conditions to better understand GPLLJ‐streamflow linkages. We assess GPLLJ conditions during historical flood events and potential future changes using CMIP6 projections. We find: (a) in May–September, GPLLJ is associated with 29%–46% of monthly precipitation and with increased precipitation intensity; (b) GPLLJ has a consistently positive impact on Missouri River streamflow over the warm season; (c) coupled jets have a larger impact on moisture transport than uncoupled jets, but streamflow impact is reduced, likely due to seasonal timing; (d) unusual jet conditions preceded historical warm‐season flood events; and (e) future projections indicate relatively small changes in GPLLJ meridional wind velocities along with large increases in moisture transport driven by humidity increases. Although future streamflow will be partially dependent on snowmelt from the upper basin, the projected intensification of warm‐season moisture transport to the Missouri River suggests possible increases in future flood risk.

Missouri River Basin↗