USGS ScienceSearch

USGS · 70210209

Geophysical framework of the continental United States: Progress, problems, and opportunities for research

Abstract

Significant progress has been made over the past five decades in determining the geophysical framework of the continental United States. Highlights include detailed maps of gravity and aeromagnetic anomalies, heat flow, crustal thickness, seismicity, state of stress, and paleomagnetic pole positions. Important tectonic insights have come from earthquake studies, and from knowledge of lithospheric structure derived from seismic reflection, refraction/wide-angle reflection, surface-wave, and teleseismic data. Additional major advances in lithospheric geophysics will depend on four key factors: the reduction of uncertainties in the measurement and interpretation of geophysical data, the widespread application of coincident geophysical methods in concert with geological investigations, the collection of a more uniform continent-scale data base for all geophysical measurements, and the investigation of topical geophysical questions regarding the physical state and properties of the lithosphere. The impracticality of repeating most geophysical field measurements introduces poorly known, but likely large, uncertainties. Since most measurements are not repeated, high priority must be given to the reduction and quantification of uncertainties in measurements and interpretations. The most productive future investigations, in terms of resolution and minimum uncertainties in interpretation, will be those that apply different geophysical methods along identical profiles or areas, and that include geological investigations as a vital ingredient. Important gaps remain in our knowledge of the geophysical framework of the United States on a continent-wide scale, including the deep conductivity structure, the nature of the Moho discontinuity, the structure of the subcrustal lithosphere, and the depth of the lithosphere/asthenosphere boundary. Most transition zones separating geologic or physiographic provinces are poorly studied, yet these zones are likely to be the locations of the most profound changes in the physical properties of the lithosphere. Application of coincident geophysical techniques is needed to study these transition zones. Several topical geophysical questions warrant special emphasis in the future. These questions include the rheology of the crust and subcrustal lithosphere; the distribution, composition, and abundance of fluids in the crust; the genesis and evolution of the Moho; the origin of crustal conductivity zones and deep crustal reflections; the evidence for seismic anisotropy; and the short-term prediction of earthquakes.

Explore related subjects

90° N90° S · 180° W ← longitude → 180° E
Source-reported bounding extent: 24.686952411999155° to 49.15296965617042° latitude; -126.21093749999999° to -67.060546875° longitude. This indicates report coverage, not an exact sampling location. View area on OpenStreetMap.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Walter D. Mooney, L. C. Pakiser. 1989-01-01. Geophysical framework of the continental United States: Progress, problems, and opportunities for research. https://doi.org/10.1130/mem172-p799

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related USGS reports

Circa 1.50–1.45 Ga metasedimentary rocks in southwestern Laurentia provide distinctive records of Mesoproterozoic regional orogenesis and craton interactions

The discovery of multiple deformed and metamorphosed sedimentary successions in southwestern Laurentia that have depositional ages between ca. 1.50 and 1.45 Ga marked a turning point in our understanding of the Mesoproterozoic tectonic evolution of the continent and its interactions with formerly adjacent cratons. Detrital zircon U-Pb ages from metasedimentary strata and igneous U-Pb zircon ages from interbedded metavolcanic rocks in Arizona and New Mexico provide unequivocal evidence for ca. 1.50–1.45 Ga deposition and burial, followed by ca. 1.45 and younger deformation, metamorphism, and plutonism. These events reflect regional shortening and crustal thickening that are most consistent with convergent to collisional orogenesis—the Mesoproterozoic Picuris orogeny—in southwestern Laurentia. Similar metasedimentary successions documented in the midcontinent of the United States and in eastern Canada help to establish ca. 1.45 Ga orogenesis as a continent-scale phenomenon associated with a complex and evolving convergent margin along southern Laurentia. Metasedimentary successions of similar age are also exposed across ~5000 km of the western Laurentian margin and contain distinctive 1.6–1.5 Ga detrital zircon populations that are globally rare except in select cratonic provinces in Australia and Antarctica. The recognition of these distinctive detrital zircon ages provides a transient record of plate interactions prior to breakup of Nuna or Columbia ca. 1.45 Ga and provides key constraints on global plate reconstructions.

GSA Memoirs

Late Cenozoic tephrochronology of the Mount Diablo area within the evolving plate-tectonic boundary zone of northern California

We present a tephrochronologic/chronostratigraphic database for the Mount Diablo area and greater San Francisco Bay region that provides a spatial and temporal framework for geologic studies in the region, including stratigraphy, paleogeography, tectonics, quantification of earth surface processes, recurrence of natural hazards, and climate change. We identified and correlated 34 tephra layers within this region using the chemical composition of their volcanic glasses, stratigraphic sequence, and isotopic and other dating techniques. Tephra layers range in age from ca. 65 ka to ca. 29 Ma, as determined by direct radiometric techniques or by correlation to sites where they have been dated. The tephra layers are of Quaternary or Neogene age except for two that are of Oligocene age. We correlated the tephra layers among numerous sites throughout northern California. Source areas of the tephra layers are the Snake River–Yellowstone hotspot trend of northern Nevada, southern Idaho, and western Wyoming; the Nevadaplano caldera complex of central Nevada; the Jemez Mountains–Valles Caldera in northwestern New Mexico; the Southern Nevada volcanic field and related source areas in eastern California and west-central Nevada; the Quien Sabe–Sonoma volcanic centers of the California Coast Ranges; and the young Cascade Range volcanic centers of northeastern California and Oregon.

GSA Memoirs

Late Cenozoic paleogeographic reconstruction of the San Francisco Bay Area from analysis of stratigraphy, tectonics, and tephrochronology

The Neogene stratigraphic and tectonic history of the Mount Diablo area is a consequence of the passage of the Mendocino Triple Junction (MTJ) by the San Francisco Bay area between 12 and 6 Ma, volcanism above a slab-window trailing the MTJ, and crustal transpression beginning ~8-6 Ma, when the Pacific Plate and Sierra Nevada microplate began to converge obliquely. Between ~12-6 Ma, parts of the Sierra Nevada microplate were displaced by faults splaying from the main trace of the San Andreas Fault and incorporated into the Pacific Plate. The Mount Diablo anticlinorium was formed by crustal compression within a left-stepping, restraining bend of the eastern San Andreas Fault system (SAF), with southwest-verging thrusting beneath, and with possible clockwise rotation between faults on its southeast and northwest. At ~10,5 Ma, a drainage divide formed between the northern Great Central Valley (GCV) and the ocean. Regional uplift accelerated at ~6 Ma with onset of transpression between the Pacific and North American plates. Marine deposition ceased in the eastern Coast Range basins as a consequence of the regional uplift accompanying passage of the MTJ, and trailing slab-window volcanism. From ~11 to ~5 Ma, andesitic volcanic intrusive rocks and lavas were erupted along the northwest crest of the central to northern Sierra Nevada and were deposited on its western slope, providing abundant sediment to northern Great Central Valley (GCV) and the northeastern Coast Ranges. Sediment filled the GCV, overtopped the Stockton fault and arch forming one large, south-draining system that flowed into a marine embayment at its southwestern end, the ancestral San Joaquin Sea. This marine embayment shrunk with time and by ~2.3 Ma was eventually cut off from the ocean. Fluvial drainage continued southwest in GCV until it was cut off in turn, probably by some combination of sea level fluctuations and transpression along the SAF that uplifted, lengthened and narrowed the outlet channel. As a consequence, a great lake, Lake Clyde, formed in the GCV at ~1.4 Ma, occupying all of the ancestral San Joaquin Valley and part of ancestral Sacramento Valley. The lake rose and fell with global glacial and interglacial cycles. After a long, extreme glacial period, Marine Oxygen Isotope Stage (MOIS) 16, it overtopped Carquinez sill at 0.63 Ma and drained via San Francisco valley (now Bay) and the Colma gap, into the Merced marine embayment of the Pacific Ocean. Later, a new outlet for GCV drainage formed between ~75 and ~130 ka ago., when the Colma gap closed due to transpression and right-slip on the SAF, and Duxbury Point at the south end of Pt. Reyes Peninsula moved sufficiently northwest along the SAF to unblock a bedrock notch, the feature we now call the Golden Gate.

California